Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
-
Fist of Legend
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: 31 Jul 2004, 15:42
Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
what do you guys think?
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
If you have the time, it would help represent what the other talent can produce....and help us find the live fights for those of us who get avoided by the live managers.
By the way...anyone up for 3 in a row with our stable? Seems everyone is anxiety ridden by the bountiful nature of our challenge.
Like the idea....but it's more work, and I consider every week you oversee this as a gift....so don't take on more unless you're lovin' it.
By the way...anyone up for 3 in a row with our stable? Seems everyone is anxiety ridden by the bountiful nature of our challenge.
Like the idea....but it's more work, and I consider every week you oversee this as a gift....so don't take on more unless you're lovin' it.
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
Don't try to steal our ideas.
-
Fist of Legend
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: 31 Jul 2004, 15:42
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
The Revival wrote:Don't try to steal our ideas.
im confused about this statement. are you implying that im stealing your idea? I've been running this for close to 3 years and have used cpu fights in the past to flesh out the rankings most notably in my first season as commissioner, but i never asked the managers if they wanted it. This season with the rankings being so sparse due to the double weight classes I thought it might be good to do again.....if anything you stole my idea, lol.
-
Fist of Legend
- Heavyweight
- Posts: 7712
- Joined: 31 Jul 2004, 15:42
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
I should mention that I'm only going to run cpu fights until the merger of the classes in Week 20.
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
I'm just messing with ya man. I got no beef with running CPU vs CPU matchups. It would make some of the CPU matchups for managers more interesting as some of the CPU opponents would be able to get wins.Fist of Legend wrote:The Revival wrote:Don't try to steal our ideas.
im confused about this statement. are you implying that im stealing your idea? I've been running this for close to 3 years and have used cpu fights in the past to flesh out the rankings most notably in my first season as commissioner, but i never asked the managers if they wanted it. This season with the rankings being so sparse due to the double weight classes I thought it might be good to do again.....if anything you stole my idea, lol.
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
Ok, ok, a packet of money the size of Ethiopia will be found on your doorstep tomorrow in the wee hours.
All in the spirit of Christmas, Ramadan, Hanukkah Kwanzaa and festivus (for the restivus).
It should defray your additional expenses to secure training crew and facilities for the CPU's.
Just don't tell them who's funding this, or people will suspect that such a gift was given in order to seek influence with judges and refs.
Something we would never do.
All in the spirit of Christmas, Ramadan, Hanukkah Kwanzaa and festivus (for the restivus).
It should defray your additional expenses to secure training crew and facilities for the CPU's.
Just don't tell them who's funding this, or people will suspect that such a gift was given in order to seek influence with judges and refs.
Something we would never do.
Re: Should I run cpu fights to make the rankings more interesting?
yes, the more data the better. it will make things more interesting. If you have the time, yes