Langford VS Saunders

Post Reply
griggy
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 16:09

Langford VS Saunders

Post by griggy »

with Langford ranked high by the WBO this fights a possibility down the line. What is peoples opinion on it. Although Langford not boxed at this Level he has a great amateur career behind him beat everything with ease in front of him so far.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by ste1983 »

Personally too early for Langford but don't think it would be the walkover many will no doubt expect for Saunders.

Neither carry massive one punch power (although I do think Langfords getting more powerful, starting to plant his feet more too) so it'd likely go the 12 rounds. Only worry for Langford would be that his chin has never really been tested whereas Saunders has.

Both are really good boxers and pick they're punches really well. Langfords never gone the 12 but he has done 10 rounds (albeit only once) and seems to have a really good engine. We all know Billy Joe tends to fade in the later stage of a fight could this be an issue?

I've got a feeling this fight could happen soon, as a fan of Langford I'd probably like to see it a bit further down the line (year or two) but if a world title fights put on the table you couldn't knock him for jumping at it.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by pyenest77 »

I think Langford is all wrong for Saunders.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by milpool »

I think it's inevitable that this fight will happen. I would imagine a win for BJS with a performance similar to Saturday night.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by crusader »

Langford has to prove himself at a significantly higher level for me to be interested in this fight. Even if he's just a standard British level fighter he should be beating all the guys he's faced so far, the last of whom was put down 7 times by Eubank Jr.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by rd350lc »

pyenest77 wrote:I think Langford is all wrong for Saunders.
in a good way or bad ?
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by ste1983 »

pyenest77 wrote:I think Langford is all wrong for Saunders.
Think you've got a point
SAPFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2732
Joined: 06 May 2010, 16:48

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by SAPFO »

Too early. Crack on his path and ignore Saunders for now. Let's not get him fed to Saunders for the sake of it. If he's good enough he'll get a shot eventually.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by PredatorHayds »

Got a feeling this fight happens next for BJS.

Really rate Tommy but this fight comes too soon for him.
I'd expect BJS to win the first load of rounds comfortably with tommy to nick a couple at the end. Scorecards around the 117-111 mark.

Domestically it's a very good division. There's some big fights to be made. Blackwell, Eubank, Doran,Etches, O'Kane.
So even if Tommy loses there's still big fights he can fall back on domestically.
magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by magnus »

My initial reaction, as it stands now, this should be nobodies idea of a "world title" fight, even in 2015.

Langford looks a reasonable prospect, at the lower end of the domestic top ten, and should be thinking of a British title shot in the next year.

I can understand why it would be made, as the promoter can't lose the title, and it seems like Tommy sells a few tickets (just like Smith-Kelly). I just don't think it should be.
milpool
Cruiserweight
Posts: 5402
Joined: 18 May 2011, 13:38

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by milpool »

magnus wrote:My initial reaction, as it stands now, this should be nobodies idea of a "world title" fight, even in 2015.

Langford looks a reasonable prospect, at the lower end of the domestic top ten, and should be thinking of a British title shot in the next year.

I can understand why it would be made, as the promoter can't lose the title, and it seems like Tommy sells a few tickets (just like Smith-Kelly). I just don't think it should be.
Totally agree with this.
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by pyenest77 »

rd350lc wrote:
pyenest77 wrote:I think Langford is all wrong for Saunders.
in a good way or bad ?

Stylewise I just think Billy struggles big time.
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by Andrew »

Langford has beaten absolutely nobodies and no disrespect to him this fight would be equivalent of Jimmy Kelly v Liam Smith.

Only seen Langford once which was last Saturday. He looks decent big at the weight carries good power but poor opposition. I'd like to see him in with one of Blackwell,OKane or Arnfield.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by PredatorHayds »

Naandrew wrote:Langford has beaten absolutely nobodies and no disrespect to him this fight would be equivalent of Jimmy Kelly v Liam Smith.

Only seen Langford once which was last Saturday. He looks decent big at the weight carries good power but poor opposition. I'd like to see him in with one of Blackwell,OKane or Arnfield.
O'Kane would be a good fight. Especially if they made it a British title eliminator.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by wesshaw1985 »

Langford vs. Blackwell next on the same card as Saunders vs. Eubank jr 2 would be ideal...
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by manno »

Tommy was a good amateur rather than elite like Bjs. I think they are at least a couple of levels apart. Plenty of other domestic middles to cut his teeth on. Think he beats etch and maybe O'kane in this country, Taylor would be a pick em, Ryder and Blackwell beat him.Good fighter tho.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by expe »

Langford's fighting Lewis Taylor for the Commonwealth title in Liverpool.
griggy
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 31 Mar 2012, 16:09

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by griggy »

Langford too much for Lewis Taylor and I believe he will outbox Blackwell although would be a good test
manno
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 459
Joined: 29 Jun 2010, 11:54

Re: Langford VS Saunders

Post by manno »

griggy wrote:Langford too much for Lewis Taylor and I believe he will outbox Blackwell although would be a good test
Tommy and Lewis had similar amateur pedigrees,neither possess devastating power and I would say both are good technicians. Taylor's win over jez Wilson last time out and the disputed loss to o Kane in Ireland suggest this will be a tough fight for both lads. All about opinions tho, good fight :TU:
Post Reply