How journalism works, pt. 94
How journalism works, pt. 94
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/boxing/ty ... ug-7149892
Dig up a load of stuff about Peter Fury that's been on the public record for many years. Add in some quotes from Peter Fury from an interview with Terry Dooley from Boxing Scene nearly three years ago, unattributed to make it look as if he's been interviewed by the Mirror. Stick it under the label of "a Sunday People investigation" as if you didn't just nick a load of stuff off Google. Job done!
British press, best in the world, holding a light to power etc etc etc
Dig up a load of stuff about Peter Fury that's been on the public record for many years. Add in some quotes from Peter Fury from an interview with Terry Dooley from Boxing Scene nearly three years ago, unattributed to make it look as if he's been interviewed by the Mirror. Stick it under the label of "a Sunday People investigation" as if you didn't just nick a load of stuff off Google. Job done!
British press, best in the world, holding a light to power etc etc etc
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23229
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Finger on the pulse as per,if their gonna recycle old stories then surely they shouldve done it after Tyson beat Wlad,strike when the irons hot 'n all that
Peter might have done a lot wrong in the past but he seems like a gent and more importantly he seems like he's trying to change
Peter might have done a lot wrong in the past but he seems like a gent and more importantly he seems like he's trying to change
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Fame is a double edged sword - if you go down that road then you have to take the rough with the smooth.
Fury courts the media, is very vocal and controversial in many of his view points - he therefore has created media interest and as such the media are interested.
Some may also see a contradiction in what he says going on about religion etc. and his actual actions - whether that be his own situation knobbing birds and making them sandwiches or the actions of his dad and uncle.
Either way this pinky adds to the "interest" that he himself has been instrumental in creating.
Fury courts the media, is very vocal and controversial in many of his view points - he therefore has created media interest and as such the media are interested.
Some may also see a contradiction in what he says going on about religion etc. and his actual actions - whether that be his own situation knobbing birds and making them sandwiches or the actions of his dad and uncle.
Either way this pinky adds to the "interest" that he himself has been instrumental in creating.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23144
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Had he been asked and refused?mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
If not, why do you think that is ?
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
...thought this might be a Bunce piece, I was going to ask whether I needed a notepad and a bic.
Anyway - question - Is Mr Fury any more controversialin this century with his views on gays and Jess Ennis and kitchens and cups of tea (plus associations with certain people), than the now lauded, revered and beloved Mr Ali was in the last century, with his probable rumoured affairs, objection to the Vietnam War, alleged racism and his association to certain people, Malcolm X(?) Nation of Islam etc etc?
Anyway - question - Is Mr Fury any more controversialin this century with his views on gays and Jess Ennis and kitchens and cups of tea (plus associations with certain people), than the now lauded, revered and beloved Mr Ali was in the last century, with his probable rumoured affairs, objection to the Vietnam War, alleged racism and his association to certain people, Malcolm X(?) Nation of Islam etc etc?
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Who's going to have him on after the things he said in the press? Don't be naive.mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32968
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
No, nowhere near.magwitch wrote:...thought this might be a Bunce piece, I was going to ask whether I needed a notepad and a bic.
Anyway - question - Is Mr Fury any more controversialin this century with his views on gays and Jess Ennis and kitchens and cups of tea (plus associations with certain people), than the now lauded, revered and beloved Mr Ali was in the last century, with his probable rumoured affairs, objection to the Vietnam War, alleged racism and his association to certain people, Malcolm X(?) Nation of Islam etc etc?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23144
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
People with far more controversial views appear on TV every day.SNG wrote:Who's going to have him on after the things he said in the press? Don't be naive.mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
On the celebratory-wank-a-thon chat show circuit? I don't think so, nice try.mickey1975 wrote:People with far more controversial views appear on TV every day.SNG wrote:Who's going to have him on after the things he said in the press? Don't be naive.mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23144
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
What have I tried to do?!
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Okay, who appears regularly on the chat show circuit with more controversial views than Tyson Fury?
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Specifically with regard to Peter; he comes across as a nice fella in interviews but the man was a drug dealing scumbag. He can talk all he wants about changing his life around blah blah blah - doesn't change the fact that as a grown man he decided to go down the wrong path. He didn't have an epiphany and choose to be a better man, he got caught. A leopard doesn't change it's spots.
With regard to John he's just an odious dirtball as the other thread attests to in some detail.
Full credit to Tyson for becoming such a likeable, decent young man having been brought up by these two goons (long prison sentences aside)
With regard to John he's just an odious dirtball as the other thread attests to in some detail.
Full credit to Tyson for becoming such a likeable, decent young man having been brought up by these two goons (long prison sentences aside)
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17111
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
While there's no proof that they are not showing any kind of biased, Jonathan Ross is a big boxing fan, so I wonder why he hasn't been on there?mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Seriously? You wonder why Jonathen Ross and ITV haven't had Tyson Fury on their chat show?keithmoonhangover wrote:While there's no proof that they are not showing any kind of biased, Jonathan Ross is a big boxing fan, so I wonder why he hasn't been on there?mickey1975 wrote:Why hasn't Tyson been on the chat show circuit? I think it's disgusting the way he's been treated since he pulled off one of the greatest ever wins by a Brit. I hope they come down just as hard on AJ and Sims just as hard if he ever reaches that level.
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Katie Holmes. You look into her quotes, clearly as bad as anything Tyson has said.SNG wrote:Okay, who appears regularly on the chat show circuit with more controversial views than Tyson Fury?
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Would you say she regularly appears on the British chat show circuit? What has she said anyway, I'm completely unaware.moogie101 wrote:Katie Holmes. You look into her quotes, clearly as bad as anything Tyson has said.SNG wrote:Okay, who appears regularly on the chat show circuit with more controversial views than Tyson Fury?
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
magwitch wrote:...thought this might be a Bunce piece, I was going to ask whether I needed a notepad and a bic.
Anyway - question - Is Mr Fury any more controversialin this century with his views on gays and Jess Ennis and kitchens and cups of tea (plus associations with certain people), than the now lauded, revered and beloved Mr Ali was in the last century, with his probable rumoured affairs, objection to the Vietnam War, alleged racism and his association to certain people, Malcolm X(?) Nation of Islam etc etc?
Really? Different worlds, I get people like Tyson but please stop trying to defend the utter shite that comes out of his mouth.
Not sure if he loves the media attention & doing it on purpose to get attention or just an idiot who seriously needs a PR agent whose first moves should be shutting down his social media accounts & banning him from all interviews.
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Sorry, I meant Katie Hopkins. An idiot who is clearly being paid to say shite, & yeah she's all over TV.SNG wrote:Would you say she regularly appears on the British chat show circuit? What has she said anyway, I'm completely unaware.moogie101 wrote:Katie Holmes. You look into her quotes, clearly as bad as anything Tyson has said.SNG wrote:Okay, who appears regularly on the chat show circuit with more controversial views than Tyson Fury?
For an idea of what she says ....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvan ... uotes.html
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Katie Holmes haha.
Right I'm with you, yeah Hopkins is a pudendum. To be fair though she's paid to say things like that, and to get the reaction she gets. Whether she believes the shite she comes out with I don't know, perhaps there's a show Tyson could go on.
Right I'm with you, yeah Hopkins is a pudendum. To be fair though she's paid to say things like that, and to get the reaction she gets. Whether she believes the shite she comes out with I don't know, perhaps there's a show Tyson could go on.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23144
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Would you ban Tibbs, Sims, AJ and Pat Barrett, too?CaptainSpacerod wrote:Specifically with regard to Peter; he comes across as a nice fella in interviews but the man was a drug dealing scumbag. He can talk all he wants about changing his life around blah blah blah - doesn't change the fact that as a grown man he decided to go down the wrong path. He didn't have an epiphany and choose to be a better man, he got caught. A leopard doesn't change it's spots.
With regard to John he's just an odious dirtball as the other thread attests to in some detail.
Full credit to Tyson for becoming such a likeable, decent young man having been brought up by these two goons (long prison sentences aside)
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
I'd say a sizeable percentage of the population disagree to some extent with the concept of homosexuality. Being amongst them shouldn't preclude Tyson from appearing on chat shows - they don't have to discuss homosexuality with him.
The political correctness of a tiny minority of over vocal liberals dictate to the masses what should and should not be approved of.
The political correctness of a tiny minority of over vocal liberals dictate to the masses what should and should not be approved of.
-
CaptainSpacerod
- Welterweight
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Didn't say I'd ban him, I just don't buy his reformed character act.mickey1975 wrote:Would you ban Tibbs, Sims, AJ and Pat Barrett, too?CaptainSpacerod wrote:Specifically with regard to Peter; he comes across as a nice fella in interviews but the man was a drug dealing scumbag. He can talk all he wants about changing his life around blah blah blah - doesn't change the fact that as a grown man he decided to go down the wrong path. He didn't have an epiphany and choose to be a better man, he got caught. A leopard doesn't change it's spots.
With regard to John he's just an odious dirtball as the other thread attests to in some detail.
Full credit to Tyson for becoming such a likeable, decent young man having been brought up by these two goons (long prison sentences aside)
Tibbs was a family feud - that's different. AJ was relatively minor. Pat Barrett - more serious. Sims I'm not aware of what he did - Tony ?
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Who has been "banned" ?mickey1975 wrote:Would you ban Tibbs, Sims, AJ and Pat Barrett, too?CaptainSpacerod wrote:Specifically with regard to Peter; he comes across as a nice fella in interviews but the man was a drug dealing scumbag. He can talk all he wants about changing his life around blah blah blah - doesn't change the fact that as a grown man he decided to go down the wrong path. He didn't have an epiphany and choose to be a better man, he got caught. A leopard doesn't change it's spots.
With regard to John he's just an odious dirtball as the other thread attests to in some detail.
Full credit to Tyson for becoming such a likeable, decent young man having been brought up by these two goons (long prison sentences aside)
You will have to try harder Mickey - ask Homicide Henry for some tips if you want to go down that road !
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23144
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: How journalism works, pt. 94
Because Tibbs says so? The prosecution didn't. Not sure about Sims myself but know he's been away and couldn't get into America (can now).