http://www.fightnews.com/Boxing/wba-qui ... aux-320301
Guess this means IBF #1 Shingo Wake will have to wait longer for his title shot...
Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
Not if its a draw.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
Titles will be split almost instantly
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
If it's a draw, Wake gets to fight Frampton?Ketchel wrote:Not if its a draw.
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
Actually, if it's a draw, Quigg and Frampton will probably have an immediate rematch, no?
Much more money in that...
Much more money in that...
-
Cutman Scabbers
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 2313
- Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 18:15
Re: Quigg vs. Frampton winner must face Rigondeaux
Ok both WBA and IBF have mandatories:Cutman Scabbers wrote:Actually, if it's a draw, Quigg and Frampton will probably have an immediate rematch, no?
Much more money in that...
http://www.newsletter.co.uk/sport/boxin ... -1-7153202