Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
-
Aaronide_ger
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 595
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014, 10:01
Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
http://www.BS.com/golovkin-sau ... ut--100391
BJS Just ducked Golovkin, another champion that heads to another direction..
Golovkin vs Johnson will happen instead in April 23rd.. In my opinion a mismatch but its the mandatory of Golovkin, IBF better choose a better opponent next time.
BJS Just ducked Golovkin, another champion that heads to another direction..
Golovkin vs Johnson will happen instead in April 23rd.. In my opinion a mismatch but its the mandatory of Golovkin, IBF better choose a better opponent next time.
Last edited by Aaronide_ger on 16 Jan 2016, 13:04, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
saunders is no opponent for ggg glad nego are death.
canelo...lara...jacobs....one of those 3 should be nextfr ggg!!!!
his career needs a boost.
canelo...lara...jacobs....one of those 3 should be nextfr ggg!!!!
his career needs a boost.
-
Aaronide_ger
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 595
- Joined: 13 Sep 2014, 10:01
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Lara has done nothing at 160, and if he chose to fight him next IBF would strip Golovkin for not fighting his Mandatory, on the other hand BJS is a world champion and IBF allows unifications over Mandatories, its a win win situation if the fight was made but its not.Chepppaaa wrote:saunders is no opponent for ggg glad nego are death.
canelo...lara...jacobs....one of those 3 should be nextfr ggg!!!!
his career needs a boost.
Jacobs is also a paper champion, his WBA regular title means nothing, BJS is a real champion (Although I believe Jacobs beats Saunders). So Fightiing BJS would be a step close to becoming an undisputed champion of the world while fighting Jacobs or Lara would result in a strip..
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Could Lara or Jacobs fight on HBO....
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Jacobs has shown every intention to continue Quillins great tradition of ducking GGG and everybody else.Boxing Prospect wrote:Could Lara or Jacobs fight on HBO....
Lara though might fight in HBO. I think its a good opponent for Golovkin.
-
sucracristo
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: 24 Dec 2011, 23:47
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
saunders will lose that title first legit top 10 guy he faces, for a fraction of
what he could make losing it to GGG
what he could make losing it to GGG
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
BJS deserves his victory lap. He just won the darn thing so let him have one or two easy defenses like every other new champion is allowed before throwing him in there with the best fighter the MW division ever saw. Jacobs vs GGG interests me though. I think that Jacobs could give GGG the toughest fight of anyone right now. He's big, fast and strong and has enormous heart. That's a fight that would GGG's toughest imo.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Saunders can make decent money fighting much more beatable opponents and will only risk facing a beast like GGG if the money is too good to refuse.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
I really really like Billy Joe, comes across as a proper good bloke but this is a another duck against Golovkin (not blaming BJS, was probably more to do with F Warren). Every boxing fan should of wanted to see this fight to see someone who is old school trying to unify a division. Feel for GGG that he is too good that no one is willing to fight him.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Lee was top 10.sucracristo wrote:saunders will lose that title first legit top 10 guy he faces, for a fraction of
what he could make losing it to GGG
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
No one wants to fight Golovkin because he doesn't bring enough money to the table, something that some of his fans are unable to understand. Other middleweights do actually exist and are capable of making just as much or more in other fights. When that's the case, as it almost always has been, they're not going to take a fight with him and it isn't because they're scared or they're ducking him, it's because boxing is a business and they're looking for the fights that leave them with the highest amount of money in the bank when they retire.Reece_D wrote:I really really like Billy Joe, comes across as a proper good bloke but this is a another duck against Golovkin (not blaming BJS, was probably more to do with F Warren). Every boxing fan should of wanted to see this fight to see someone who is old school trying to unify a division. Feel for GGG that he is too good that no one is willing to fight him.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
sucracristo wrote:saunders will lose that title first legit top 10 guy he faces, for a fraction of
what he could make losing it to GGG
The guy he beat for the title was a legit top 10 middleweight
Will take an exceptional fighter to beat BJS.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Which middleweights do you consider exceptional?Naandrew wrote:sucracristo wrote:saunders will lose that title first legit top 10 guy he faces, for a fraction of
what he could make losing it to GGG
The guy he beat for the title was a legit top 10 middleweight
Will take an exceptional fighter to beat BJS.
BJS is good but nothing special IMO...he was getting tossed around late by a green Eubank and only just squeaked by Lee due to the KDs. Then again, the depth at MW isn't great so he's still probably top 3-5.
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16628
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Exactly I've never known a fighter win his first world title and then defend against the P4P #1 in his first defence, the fight can wait a while.caldo2025 wrote:BJS deserves his victory lap. He just won the darn thing so let him have one or two easy defenses like every other new champion is allowed before throwing him in there with the best fighter the MW division ever saw. Jacobs vs GGG interests me though. I think that Jacobs could give GGG the toughest fight of anyone right now. He's big, fast and strong and has enormous heart. That's a fight that would GGG's toughest imo.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Never seemed like it was really on in the first place. Saunders has made it quite clear he wants no part of Golovkin
-
Nightmare Roy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 16628
- Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
He'd fight him tomorrow if he got the sort of money Hatton did against Floyd, it's just not there right now.The Revival wrote:Never seemed like it was really on in the first place. Saunders has made it quite clear he wants no part of Golovkin
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Really ? can't have been following the sport for long then because I've seen it several timesNightmare Roy wrote:Exactly I've never known a fighter win his first world title and then defend against the P4P #1 in his first defence, the fight can wait a while.caldo2025 wrote:BJS deserves his victory lap. He just won the darn thing so let him have one or two easy defenses like every other new champion is allowed before throwing him in there with the best fighter the MW division ever saw. Jacobs vs GGG interests me though. I think that Jacobs could give GGG the toughest fight of anyone right now. He's big, fast and strong and has enormous heart. That's a fight that would GGG's toughest imo.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
I think bringing £3m to the table, is enough.expe wrote:No one wants to fight Golovkin because he doesn't bring enough money to the table, something that some of his fans are unable to understand. Other middleweights do actually exist and are capable of making just as much or more in other fights. When that's the case, as it almost always has been, they're not going to take a fight with him and it isn't because they're scared or they're ducking him, it's because boxing is a business and they're looking for the fights that leave them with the highest amount of money in the bank when they retire.Reece_D wrote:I really really like Billy Joe, comes across as a proper good bloke but this is a another duck against Golovkin (not blaming BJS, was probably more to do with F Warren). Every boxing fan should of wanted to see this fight to see someone who is old school trying to unify a division. Feel for GGG that he is too good that no one is willing to fight him.
I dont see who BJS can fight and get anywhere near that money.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
We don't know what the offer was, various figures have been quoted and certain people have decided to run with the highest of them, which was around $3m. He makes that fighting Eubank again, so why take a harder fight on the road for the same money he can get at home. The Golovkin fight will still be there waiting for him down the line when the time's right anyway.Kingfield wrote:I think bringing £3m to the table, is enough.expe wrote:No one wants to fight Golovkin because he doesn't bring enough money to the table, something that some of his fans are unable to understand. Other middleweights do actually exist and are capable of making just as much or more in other fights. When that's the case, as it almost always has been, they're not going to take a fight with him and it isn't because they're scared or they're ducking him, it's because boxing is a business and they're looking for the fights that leave them with the highest amount of money in the bank when they retire.Reece_D wrote:I really really like Billy Joe, comes across as a proper good bloke but this is a another duck against Golovkin (not blaming BJS, was probably more to do with F Warren). Every boxing fan should of wanted to see this fight to see someone who is old school trying to unify a division. Feel for GGG that he is too good that no one is willing to fight him.
I dont see who BJS can fight and get anywhere near that money.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
How much did he make for the first Eubank fight? What about the Lee fight?
What is your basis for claiming that he'd make $3m if he fought Eubank again?
What is your basis for claiming that he'd make $3m if he fought Eubank again?
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
We've definitely seen it happen, I agree. But the new age of boxing, winning a belt unfortunately means that the boxer gets to enjoy the new belt for a little bit and parade around before defending it against the #1 contender like they did back in the day. I hate it too but it's just the way the sports gone. I'm happy that we are hearing a little more about "mandatories" though now and champions living up to their obligations. But now the problem with that is that most of the mandatory fights demanded by these organizations make ZERO SENSE. There's a million agendas in the sport and you VERY rarely see an organization designating a worthy mandatory. In the rare cases they do, champions now have the ability to pay that mandatory challenger a sum of money instead of fighting him. It's a joke. The whole thing's a joke.littlepug wrote:Really ? can't have been following the sport for long then because I've seen it several timesNightmare Roy wrote:Exactly I've never known a fighter win his first world title and then defend against the P4P #1 in his first defence, the fight can wait a while.caldo2025 wrote:BJS deserves his victory lap. He just won the darn thing so let him have one or two easy defenses like every other new champion is allowed before throwing him in there with the best fighter the MW division ever saw. Jacobs vs GGG interests me though. I think that Jacobs could give GGG the toughest fight of anyone right now. He's big, fast and strong and has enormous heart. That's a fight that would GGG's toughest imo.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
GGGcrusader wrote:Which middleweights do you consider exceptional?Naandrew wrote:sucracristo wrote:saunders will lose that title first legit top 10 guy he faces, for a fraction of
what he could make losing it to GGG
The guy he beat for the title was a legit top 10 middleweight
Will take an exceptional fighter to beat BJS.
BJS is good but nothing special IMO...he was getting tossed around late by a green Eubank and only just squeaked by Lee due to the KDs. Then again, the depth at MW isn't great so he's still probably top 3-5.
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Fair post caldo
Re: Golovkin-Saunders is off - negotiations are dead
Would you be surprised if Alvarez or Jacobs beat BJS, assuming they fought?Naandrew wrote:GGGcrusader wrote:Which middleweights do you consider exceptional?Naandrew wrote:
The guy he beat for the title was a legit top 10 middleweight
Will take an exceptional fighter to beat BJS.
BJS is good but nothing special IMO...he was getting tossed around late by a green Eubank and only just squeaked by Lee due to the KDs. Then again, the depth at MW isn't great so he's still probably top 3-5.