Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a fornicating clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?thechump wrote:Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard onexpe wrote:He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.thechump wrote: You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clowns
Tyson Fury
Re: Tyson Fury
Re: Tyson Fury
Povetkin will wreck Wilder, Wilder would not have faced Wlad. Fury can be a dick but is by far the better boxer (than Wilder). Wilder has serious power and gets strange angles.
Re: Tyson Fury
Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?expe wrote:Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?thechump wrote:Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard onexpe wrote: He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.
Re: Tyson Fury
Hahaha who the fvck are the headteacher ina school or something haha behave will ya with the "your answer will determine what i think of you" hahaha but for the record fury is a better boxer than wilder but in your opinikn who hits harder wilder or fury? Your answer will determine what i think of you and for the record it isnt very good atmFrozenMixedVegtables wrote:So who is the better boxer in your opinion Fury or Wilder?thechump wrote:You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clownsFrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
Wilder is shockingly bad at boxing for a world champion . Fury would embarrass Wilder. Give him an absolute schooling. You get mongs saying Wilder is athletic and Fury is ungainly when Fury is a far better mover than Wilder. Wilder has garbage footwork and he's clumsy as hell. He's nothing more than a windmill with a hard punch. People probably think he's a good boxer because he has the black and slick look. Fvckin idiots.
The answer will determine my opinion of you which right now is not good.
Re: Tyson Fury
Presumably these two know each other very well having boxed under the same promoter. I expect it (if "it" actually existed) was just silliness. Carl can look after himself ably there. Probably at the cost of a broken hand.palooka wrote:lefty wrote:Now there's rumours all over twitter that not only did security have to seperate them but that Froch basically legged it aswell! Now I don't know whether to believe that or not lol. To be fair though, whatever the circumstances, Fury is a lot bigger than Froch.glad to see you back pal.
I can't see Froch legging it, he's game enough. I can remember reading about Jason Rowland squaring up to Clifton Mitchell over something or other - some people are just game to the core.
No way either man is dumb enough to throw the first punch. A rumour not worth propagating.
Re: Tyson Fury
Find me a class boxer that doesn't have good movement and feints. There's more to being a good boxer than just throwing punches.thechump wrote:Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?expe wrote:Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?thechump wrote: Cool,i did watch and predict this ya know so no need for the hard on
Re: Tyson Fury
So the answer is "yes chump i agree"expe wrote:Find me a class boxer that doesn't have good movement and feints. There's more to being a good boxer than just throwing punches.thechump wrote:Beating wlad hardly throwing a punch isnt a class boxer,his movement and feints were what beat wlad not beinga class boxer do u agree?expe wrote: Yet you say that anyone who thinks he's a class boxer is a mong and a effing clown? If Fury isn't a class boxer, then which Heavyweight is?
-
Black Sam Bellamy
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1476
- Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51
Re: Tyson Fury
Sooner or later they will have to put Wilder in with someone decent. And when they do he loses.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: Tyson Fury
I've heard it all now. He isn't a good boxer. He just uses movement and feints well. The two being mutually fookin exclusive of course. Fucken stroll on.
Re: Tyson Fury
These two are also used in dance and ballet,u fuckin stroll on,its a boxing fvckin forum not a fury d1ck suckin site u mugCounter-puncher wrote:I've heard it all now. He isn't a good boxer. He just uses movement and feints well. The two being mutually fookin exclusive of course. Fucken stroll on.
Re: Tyson Fury
Aww cheers. You also get a pass so we will give u a rusk for being a very clever boy (clap clap clap) well doneFrozenMixedVegtables wrote:You get a pass. The equivalent of a Silver star at a special needs school type of pass.thechump wrote:Hahaha who the fvck are the headteacher ina school or something haha behave will ya with the "your answer will determine what i think of you" hahaha but for the record fury is a better boxer than wilder but in your opinikn who hits harder wilder or fury? Your answer will determine what i think of you and for the record it isnt very good atmFrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
So who is the better boxer in your opinion Fury or Wilder?
The answer will determine my opinion of you which right now is not good.
Wilder hits harder.
Re: Tyson Fury
Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
They are a waste of time.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Tyson Fury
Yeah, like palooka said welcome back mate.palooka wrote:lefty wrote:Now there's rumours all over twitter that not only did security have to seperate them but that Froch basically legged it aswell! Now I don't know whether to believe that or not lol. To be fair though, whatever the circumstances, Fury is a lot bigger than Froch.glad to see you back pal.
I can't see Froch legging it, he's game enough. I can remember reading about Jason Rowland squaring up to Clifton Mitchell over something or other - some people are just game to the core.
Re: Tyson Fury
it's a forum is it not ? are people not allowed to have opinions that differ from yours ?Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Re: Tyson Fury
HEY....horse im.not anti fury but cmon that was terrible last night he made an absolute tit of himself and the world was lookin on probably thinkin the same as everyone but u tyson fury nuthuggers,what an absolute d1ckhead.Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Re: Tyson Fury
I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Re: Tyson Fury
thechump wrote:HEY....horse im.not anti fury but cmon that was terrible last night he made an absolute tit of himself and the world was lookin on probably thinkin the same as everyone but u tyson fury nuthuggers,what an absolute d1ckhead.Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Take it for what it is nothing more
Re: Tyson Fury
Yo frozenmixedveg think u need to thaw out abit ur brains still frozen, wlad was champ for 9 years not 11 he won the ibf in 2006 lost it in 2015 unless the nabf is now a version of the world title and imo fury will lose the rematch but like i always say its just an opinion so ppl dont get all angry and frustrated its a forum is it not???FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:A ruskthechump wrote:Aww cheers. You also get a pass so we will give u a rusk for being a very clever boy (clap clap clap) well doneFrozenMixedVegtables wrote:
You get a pass. The equivalent of a Silver star at a special needs school type of pass.
Wilder hits harder.![]()
That was quite funny for a guy who clearly knows fvck all about boxing. I suspect you might be trolling a bit because some of your opinions are just to ridiculous to comprehend. Using intelligent movement and faints against an 11 year undefeated ATG heavyweight does not equate to class boxingGood luck with that one chump
Re: Tyson Fury
Whatever expo your not the god of boxing forum everyone has an opinion so deal with it,its not life or death so chill yeexpe wrote:I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Re: Tyson Fury
It's bad either way.expe wrote:I don't even think he's a troll, just incredibly stupid.
Re: Tyson Fury
His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .FrozenMixedVegtables wrote:Well let him have his opinion then.rd350lc wrote:it's a forum is it not ? are people not allowed to have opinions that differ from yours ?Horse wrote:Why bother interacting with these anti-Fury trolls?
They are a waste of time.
Re: Tyson Fury
You all shud just make a post with fury fans only then we will all know not to comment on it cause our oponion wont count in all u fury sausage jockeys eyes ![[icon_wink.gif] ;-)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32970
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Tyson Fury
True, although he also landed less than 100 punches in 12 rounds, so let's not get too carried away with either of them just yet.expe wrote:He outboxed the man that's dominated the Heavyweight division for the last decade.thechump wrote: You also get mongs who think fury is this class boxer hahaah fuckin clowns
Re: Tyson Fury
Some opinions do not deserve respect.rd350lc wrote:His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17116
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Tyson Fury
Errr.... like yours.Horse wrote:Some opinions do not deserve respect.rd350lc wrote:His opinions are plentyful , but the trouble is he does not respect anybody else's .