2015's fights between a division's top two
2015's fights between a division's top two
I'd suggest that this reflects a little of what boxing delivers today. Obviously a 'top two' is debatable and subjective and also in some cases their meeting is not really warranted (if they'd recently fought each other recently, prior to 2015.) Still, there are 17 weight divisions.
Mayweather-Pacman for starters. Any others?
Mayweather-Pacman for starters. Any others?
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Wlad & Fury
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Maybe not ot top 2 but Moreno Vs Yamanaka can't have been far off
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Yeah wouldn't dispute this.Boxing Prospect wrote:Maybe not ot top 2 but Moreno Vs Yamanaka can't have been far off
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Kovalev v Stevenson
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
I wishdr_devious wrote:Kovalev v Stevenson
-
dr_devious
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 5349
- Joined: 29 Dec 2005, 09:19
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
It's strange how many Top 10 Vs Top 10 bouts the division seems to give us, even if unification seems to be on no ones mind. Very odd. and brilliant, division.davie wrote:There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
I don't think many would have had Tyson rated above Povetkin last year prior to Wlad-Fury. Their rematch is the heavyweight's top two for 2016 though.cocobongo wrote:Wlad & Fury
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Middleweight division did also - alas obviously not Cotto-Golovkin though.Boxing Prospect wrote:It's strange how many Top 10 Vs Top 10 bouts the division seems to give us, even if unification seems to be on no ones mind. Very odd. and brilliant, division.davie wrote:There won't be any chance of a cruiser weight bout being metioned. I don't think there's been a unification since Haye vs Maccarinelli
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
I'm a sad so and so who keeps rankings. The highest ranked I had facing in 2015 were
1. Wlad 3. Fury
1. Kovalev 3. Pascal
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
1. Golovkin 6. Lemieux
2. Cotto 1Lm. Canelo
1. Floyd 2. Pacman
1. Garcia 4. Peterson
2. Matthysse 4. Postol
3. Shafikov 5lww. Barthélemy
3. Miura 5. Vargas
2. Frampton 5. Avalos
4. Quigg 2bw. Martinez
4. Mcdonnell 5. Kameda
1. Gonzalez 6. Sosa
1. Gonzalez 6. Viloria
3. Ioka 5. Reveco
I only keep rankings down to flyweight.
1. Wlad 3. Fury
1. Kovalev 3. Pascal
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
1. Golovkin 6. Lemieux
2. Cotto 1Lm. Canelo
1. Floyd 2. Pacman
1. Garcia 4. Peterson
2. Matthysse 4. Postol
3. Shafikov 5lww. Barthélemy
3. Miura 5. Vargas
2. Frampton 5. Avalos
4. Quigg 2bw. Martinez
4. Mcdonnell 5. Kameda
1. Gonzalez 6. Sosa
1. Gonzalez 6. Viloria
3. Ioka 5. Reveco
I only keep rankings down to flyweight.
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Surprised Kameda was 5, is that for their first or second bout.
Certainly though one of the two bouts would have seen a collective higher rating than 4 & 5
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
That's a terrible indictment against the modern super-middleweight division
Certainly though one of the two bouts would have seen a collective higher rating than 4 & 5
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
That's a terrible indictment against the modern super-middleweight division
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: 2015's fights between a division's top two
Both in the top 10 was the Kameda rematch.davie wrote:Surprised Kameda was 5, is that for their first or second bout.
Certainly though one of the two bouts would have seen a collective higher rating than 4 & 5
2. Abraham 4. Stieglitz
That's a terrible indictment against the modern super-middleweight division
Stieglitz at 4 is shocking.
Based on the rankings at the time of the fights Mcdonnell and Ioka are the only fighters with 2 top 5 wins and they both won against the odds and triumphed again in the rematch.
I know Stieglitz at 4 seems high but it was a 60/40 fight beforehand. Obviously in hindsight Stieglitz didn't have much to offer.
Abraham actually had a ridiculously good year and bravo to him for taking Ramirez next. Another top 10 fighter.