GGG's opinion of Groves

Old Jack J
Middleweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Old Jack J »

As much as I wanted Murray to win it, he clearly didn't.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

Old Jack J wrote:As much as I wanted Murray to win it, he clearly didn't.
Clear to you, not to me.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

Horse wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:There really wasn't.
There really, really was.

Wasn't. Thats the final word on it.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

Horse wrote:
Old Jack J wrote:As much as I wanted Murray to win it, he clearly didn't.
Clear to you, not to me.

Clear he didn't. To everyone
Old Jack J
Middleweight
Posts: 1626
Joined: 24 Jan 2014, 16:34

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Old Jack J »

The fact that you even have to argue whether there was an argument actually dilutes the fictional argument that there was an argument to be had in the first place which makes it even less of an argument every time you argue about the argument so if there was (there wasn't) an argument then you really need to stop arguing about the argument that nobody is arguing about apart from you.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

CharlesListon wrote:Clear he didn't. To everyone
Not clear. End of story.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

Old Jack J wrote:The fact that you even have to argue whether there was an argument actually dilutes the fictional argument that there was an argument to be had in the first place which makes it even less of an argument every time you argue about the argument so if there was (there wasn't) an argument then you really need to stop arguing about the argument that nobody is arguing about apart from you.
I don't get the logic.

I think you just wanted to say argument a lot.
Finn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5509
Joined: 07 May 2009, 15:56

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Finn »

Horse wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:Clear he didn't. To everyone
Not clear. End of story.
It's not the end of the story in fact I fear that any minute now falkor is going to fly past!
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32976
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Boxerbeetle »

There must have been an RBR on this board? Would be interesting to see what we all said at the time, I genuinely can't remember...
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

Horse wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:Clear he didn't. To everyone
Not clear. End of story.

Yes, its exactly that. A story in your head.

The fact is he clearly lost.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

CharlesListon wrote:Yes, its exactly that. A story in your head.

The fact is he clearly lost.
Nope, read the threads I posted.

I clearly win the argument, as usual.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

Your posts were nonsensical.

It's why you often lose debates and arguments.

There is no sense of logic or fact in many of your thoughts.

You are humoured.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

CharlesListon wrote:Your posts were nonsensical.

It's why you often lose debates and arguments.

There is no sense of logic or fact in many of your thoughts.

You are humoured.
You are wrong.

Stop digging.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

You are.

You're the forum equivalent of an eastern european journeyman. One that has grubby shorts.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Horse »

CharlesListon wrote:You are.

You're the forum equivalent of an eastern european journeyman. One that has grubby shorts.
No, I'm like Mayweather.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by CharlesListon »

Horse wrote:
CharlesListon wrote:You are.

You're the forum equivalent of an eastern european journeyman. One that has grubby shorts.
No, I'm like Mayweather.

Yes. Floyd snr.
As he is now, complete with beard dandruff.
skanksta
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16809
Joined: 17 Oct 2008, 10:25

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by skanksta »

mickey1975 wrote:
Horse wrote:
Finn wrote:There was no argument for him beating AA.
Yes, there was.
There wasn't.
There was.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by Deadendgeneration »

I had the fight even with AA winning thanks to the deduction if I remember correctly. It was a close fight.
ALI
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 27 Nov 2003, 14:10

Re: GGG's opinion of Groves

Post by ALI »

I'm fed up of GGG's career and all the hyperbowl around him.

10 years a pro, HBO hype machine waxing lyrical about him for years, 34 & 0 now, won his first world title 5 years ago, turns 34 in a couple of months and he's still fought nobody at elite level.

Yawn at wasted talent.
Post Reply