Trolling now?mickey1975 wrote:Murray got stopped late on. I blame his stamina. He has zero impressive wins, either.
British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32968
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
What is Murray's best win?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
U mad bro?Horse wrote:Trolling now?mickey1975 wrote:Murray got stopped late on. I blame his stamina. He has zero impressive wins, either.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Boxerbeetle wrote:What is Murray's best win?
His back catalogue is entirely composed of moral victories and near misses. Plus a green Blackwell, and, umm, khomitsky?
Mmm yeah.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Sergio Martinez.Boxerbeetle wrote:What is Murray's best win?
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Yes, the disrespect that Martin Murray receives disgusts me.Counter-puncher wrote:U mad bro?
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Stop worshipping the judges, buddy.Counter-puncher wrote:His back catalogue is entirely composed of moral victories and near misses. Plus a green Blackwell, and, umm, khomitsky?
Mmm yeah.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
I thought the remains of Martinez beat him. It's bad that Murray couldn't even beat him. He was about as fit as Dazzling Daz Barker was in his only defense.Horse wrote:Sergio Martinez.Boxerbeetle wrote:What is Murray's best win?
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
.Horse wrote:Stop worshipping the judges, buddy.Counter-puncher wrote:His back catalogue is entirely composed of moral victories and near misses. Plus a green Blackwell, and, umm, khomitsky?
Mmm yeah.
Stop worshipping your own biased scorecards concerning a fighter you have a mancrush on.
The nature of the game is that I have to accept the judgement of three men sat at ringside over that of any random crank posting on an internet forum, in terms of who won the fight.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
No, he was like that against Cotto.mickey1975 wrote:I thought the remains of Martinez beat him. It's bad that Murray couldn't even beat him. He was about as fit as Dazzling Daz Barker was in his only defense.
Against Murray he was nowhere near that over the hill.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
No, you choose to accept their scorecards.Counter-puncher wrote:Stop worshipping your own biased scorecards concerning a fighter you have a mancrush on.
The nature of the game is that I have to accept the judgement of three men sat at ringside over that of any random crank posting on an internet forum, in terms of who won the fight.
I do not.
-
simonwalsh
- Middleweight
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 05 May 2014, 08:40
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Perhaps I should have clarified, I meant as boxers. I'm sure he's a lovely person.davie wrote:Who doesn't like Ricky Burns?simonwalsh wrote:Continually miffed by high rankings for Bellew, Burns and Groves, but that's probably just because I don't like them.
Don't rate him? Fine
Think he's made some poor defences or not fought who you thought he should? Fine
But you can't not like Ricky Burns. He has to be one of the least offensive people in the sport
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
i do not accept your scorecards.Horse wrote:No, you choose to accept their scorecards.Counter-puncher wrote:Stop worshipping your own biased scorecards concerning a fighter you have a mancrush on.
The nature of the game is that I have to accept the judgement of three men sat at ringside over that of any random crank posting on an internet forum, in terms of who won the fight.
I do not.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Do you accept your own?Counter-puncher wrote:i do not accept your scorecards.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
I don't wholly trust them. one person watching from a television screen isn't always going to score perfectly, especially in a close fight with close rounds.Horse wrote:Do you accept your own?Counter-puncher wrote:i do not accept your scorecards.
when a mate and I score a fight together we often use a shorthand, its either a '3-0 round' (we reckon all judges will score one way), or a '2-1 round' (self-explanatory i hope). but quite often we will differ as to which fighter gets the 2 and which one gets the 1. many fights, we will have 3 or 4 '2-1 rounds'. the variable element this shows in scoring of close rounds/close fights is telling, IMO, because it means both of us are saying we could end up with a score 115-113 one way, but totally understand a score of 115-113 the other way.
many fights like this get called 'robberies', or used by cranks on the internet as definite wins for one fighter or another.
i think that is bogus.
Last edited by Counter-puncher on 02 Feb 2016, 06:05, edited 1 time in total.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
So you respect the judges' decision more than your own?Counter-puncher wrote:I don't wholly trust them. one person watching from a television screen isn't always going to score perfectly, especially in a close fight with close rounds.
-
Counter-puncher
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 39141
- Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
usually, very marginally, yes. they are ringside and I am not. in egregious cases, no, but in my opinion egregious cases are rarer than internet complainers make out, see my edits to previous post for the reason why i think thatHorse wrote:So you respect the judges' decision more than your own?Counter-puncher wrote:I don't wholly trust them. one person watching from a television screen isn't always going to score perfectly, especially in a close fight with close rounds.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Quite month with not much at all going on. Looks like this month may well be the same, particularly with the Flannagan card being pushed back.
Ryder got a good win over a solid Euro level opponent, that should probably be enough to see him sneak in ahead of Eggington imo, but I'm not that bothered either way.
It is a bit boring when hardly anyone on the list fights. you guys have even had to bring up Martin Murray again just so you have something to argue about.

Ryder got a good win over a solid Euro level opponent, that should probably be enough to see him sneak in ahead of Eggington imo, but I'm not that bothered either way.
It is a bit boring when hardly anyone on the list fights. you guys have even had to bring up Martin Murray again just so you have something to argue about.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
If Ryder hadn't lost to Blackwell recently then he might have sneaked in.keirw wrote:Ryder got a good win over a solid Euro level opponent, that should probably be enough to see him sneak in ahead of Eggington imo, but I'm not that bothered either way.
keirw wrote:Quite month with not much at all going on. Looks like this month may well be the same, particularly with the Flannagan card being pushed back.
I was going to start a thread about how bad the British boxing line up was at the moment, but then I decided that I couldn't be bothered.keirw wrote:It is a bit boring when hardly anyone on the list fights. you guys have even had to bring up Martin Murray again just so you have something to argue about.
Things aren't looking very interesting at the moment, but things have got to pick up pretty soon.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
We are not arguing about Murray. Horse is wrong. He just can't accept it.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
I'm not wrong.mickey1975 wrote:We are not arguing about Murray. Horse is wrong. He just can't accept it.
Murray is a British ATG. He deserves far more respect than he gets.
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23146
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Plucky loser. The stupid ranking in your list about his biggest achievement in the sport. Says it all, really.Horse wrote:I'm not wrong.mickey1975 wrote:We are not arguing about Murray. Horse is wrong. He just can't accept it.
Murray is a British ATG. He deserves far more respect than he gets.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
How small-minded.mickey1975 wrote:Plucky loser. The stupid ranking in your list about his biggest achievement in the sport. Says it all, really.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17115
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
Have you ever changed your top thirty after comments have been made?Horse wrote:Any comments/criticisms of the British Top 30 P4P list are very welcome.
Re: British Top 30 P4P February 2016
My top 30 changes almost every month.keithmoonhangover wrote:Have you ever changed your top thirty after comments have been made?