Introduction: the UWBCAFO-I

Post Reply
ImranSarwar
Super Welterweight
Posts: 917
Joined: 26 Sep 2014, 22:53

Introduction: the UWBCAFO-I

Post by ImranSarwar »

First: this IS NOT a additional boxing governance. This is a unity theme and a Goverancence of the "second echelon" only. I began my work in March/2007.
We divide boxing up into a FIRST ECHELON for the WBC WBA IBF & the WBO. We classify all groups outside the FIRST &MAJOR FOUR as "second echelon potentials".
I have been a fan myself for almost 50 years.
We effect ONLY the men's side of the SPORT. I...do not have the background required to myself look at WOMEN'S BOXING..I'm a FAN/ YES!
Also: this is ABOUT world championships only. IF a WBU and a WBC "intercontinental" a.s.f./a.s.o.\ETC. wish to "mix" titles...."GO!"
We count the '2e' as a FIVE [5] USA States value (approximately). We governing only the '2e'. The '1e' aught only continue as they have been going. [We don't "agree" with the three tier that the WBA has forming, "ha, ha"..but...we view such only as "idiocentricity"! IT'S UP TO THEM TO REFORM ON THAT ITEM! It IS NOT ACTUALLY THREE CHAMPS! Myself, I simply "ignore" the 2 and the 3 placed!] We are a ADVOCATION to the '1e', only! We do ASK that THEY/ UNITED begin to get "harsh" with title- holders (such AS GENNADY GOLOVIKIN.....) who ARE "mixing".
The UWBCAFO-I stands for: United WBC WBA IBF WBO (dash) "the second echelon factor".
First rule-of-thumb is that the Echelons are not to be "mixed". This is a enforcement of the ESTABLISHMENT. Though...we only look to "govern/register" the '2e'.
We need "Truth in Advertising". The "second echelon" must\present itself/in TRUTH.
The world media has been TURNED OFF to Our Sport on account of the NONSENSE of the "expanding waistline"/("governance").
I am AT WAR against the IBO which is the FIRST &FOREMOST MAJOR DECEIVER! & they are no.5 to ("establish". GIVE ME A BREAK!).
We advocate also a RE-SET for the 'C' weight division. All 'C' weight boxers please temp only consider yourself, 'H' [hope you have as much "good fortune" as Marco Huck! : )]. Match SZ., that's -fine- -!!!!-
What we will like to do with the 'C' div. is to sink the weight back down to 190/195 "champions choice"/VACS at 190.
WHY? '200lb' impeds upon the "rich history" of the SUPREME WEIGHT DIVISION. Boxing is "good" with the LB4LB LISTS WE SEE/BUT!..... it's the HVY-wt div that is the "grand prize" of SPORT!
'200lb'/'C' is chopping up/ "down" our HISTORY! I'm SICK OF IT!
But, the '1e' has to come to their OWN realizations! IF THEY DO NOT FUNCTION ACCORDINGLY/ I "can not help that"! But...you are NOT a '2e' w/o either NO 'C' on your card -OR- you come with the "new sets"! 195/190 as I've stated.
Remember: this effects world championship Boxing/ men's side only!
My name is John Wilkinson and I am in Connecticut, USA about two hours either way to BOSTON; to NYC. Am making a boxing comeback myself. I talk about this on a FEW OF my contents. Am: 147. Will go higher if things are correct and it "looks like an advantage". ARMY ("Old Army") I was in the 8Th mech Infantry Div. in Germany '75 to '79 [height of Rene Weller & Ernst Muller!]. Willie Robinson (Miami, FL) was my good Coach. I started at 139lbs. was in GERMANY when Edward Green built his "fabulous record". Lost for a first time in the 1/4f of the '77 USAREUR. Michael Taylor won my weight class [he is "all class!" I respect him so very much, & we become friendship on Fb over the past 1 1/2 year]. My team mates with "Robbie" were: Don Schumpert [1](156), Robert Naper[2](147), Doug
Singleton [3] (Hvy), Jerry "Red" Wiles [4] (125), Clarence Powell [5] (132), Roy Armour [6] (106)
[1] St Louis,MO. [2] Beckley, W.Vir. [3] Detroit,MI.[4] Tacoma,WA.[5] South Carolina?? [6]Youngstown, Ohio
Post Reply