wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
they had a clause in there, right? what are
they waiting for? wlad getting younger?
they waiting for? wlad getting younger?
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
Only reason the rematch wouldn't go forward is if Wlad for whatever reason changed his mind and didn't want it. By contractual obligation Fury would have to fight Wlad if Wlad wanted the rematch.man wrote:they had a clause in there, right? what are
they waiting for? wlad getting younger?
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
that's what i thought too. if wlad doesn'tThe Revival wrote:Only reason the rematch wouldn't go forward is if Wlad for whatever reason changed his mind and didn't want it. By contractual obligation Fury would have to fight Wlad if Wlad wanted the rematch.man wrote:they had a clause in there, right? what are
they waiting for? wlad getting younger?
make the contract happen within february
then i guess this was it for him.
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
this makes sense , all adding up now .klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
I don't know why his stock would go lower than it was before the 1st fight if he lost to Wlad. Hell he'd still have a wide UD win over him on his resume.klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
It makes sense to pay 10 million to avoid fighting a guy you have already beaten earning more money in the process???rd350lc wrote:this makes sense , all adding up now .klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
And fight Haye, who pulled out of two fights leaving him high and dry and out of pocket?
That makes sense???
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
Fury has 10 million?klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
-
handsofstone
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 23084
- Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
Lenny wrote:It makes sense to pay 10 million to avoid fighting a guy you have already beaten earning more money in the process???rd350lc wrote:this makes sense , all adding up now .klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.
And fight Haye, who pulled out of two fights leaving him high and dry and out of pocket?
That makes sense???
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
I meant it makes sense that there is no news on the rematch , not that the Haye fight was a better option. 
Re: wlad - tyson, where is the rematch?
Fury will never fight Haye, and has said so. Not for 100 million I believe he said, and also said he would vacate all his belts to not fight him.klitoris wrote:Fury is going to pay 10 million to get out of the rematch. It's basically confirmed. He knows that if he loses in the rematch to Wlad, his stock will go lower than it was before the first fight. Fury vs Haye in Spring probably.