Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Frampton vs. Quigg Winner and How?

Poll ended at 17 Nov 2015, 17:17

Carl Frampton Stoppage
75
22%
Carl Frampton Decision
114
34%
Draw
10
3%
Scott Quigg Decision
27
8%
Scott Quigg Stoppage
110
33%
 
Total votes: 336

wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Hopefully Quigg stands his ground, good luck explaining the fight being off cause you can't have the dressing room you want.
Hasn't Carl said they should lock that dressing room and both use different ones?
So? He could just not be such a massive egotist and let Quigg use his regular dressing room, it's just mind games but Framoton comes across extremely insecure trying stuff like this.
Why should Frampton let Quigg use his regular dressing room, just because?
Quigg already got the fight in Manchester, how much more comfort does he need?
its mind games, nothing too much to be read into it.
Toss a coin, winner gets the room...
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

Nah fornicate that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by ste1983 »

SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13364
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by jameswilson »

I didn't think Frampton could look more gaunt than Tuesday but frig me he looks like skeletor now. And there's still another day before the weigh in.
Marlo Stanfield
Middleweight
Posts: 447
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by Marlo Stanfield »

jameswilson wrote:I didn't think Frampton could look more gaunt than Tuesday but frig me he looks like skeletor now. And there's still another day before the weigh in.
thought he looked fine tbh
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by expe »

ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
And he's only used the dressing room three times in 33 fights, hardly a regular thing. It's the main dressing room in the arena, so in normal circumstances it goes to the headline act, in this case that's Frampton.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?

Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?

Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
If its in Belfast, Manchester or anywhere else in the World, Frampton is the A-Side, he should have the choice of dressing room...
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1793
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by tigermoth87 »

Frampton seeming a bit rattled.

Honestly think Quigg is going to KO him. My prediction, 4th round KO.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by ste1983 »

SNG wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Nah eff that, Quigg is the home fighter he should get his usual dressing room. Carl should have sorted all this stuff out during negotiations if it bothered him, it's a Matchroom show and Frampton is the opponent coming to another country he should get the same treatment as the rest of the fighters Eddie brings over.
He's not the 'home' fighter is he though its a co promotion, its not just a Matchroom show and its the same country (United Kingdom).
So if this fight was in Belfast you wouldn't consider Frampton the home fighter?

Listen, if it was an issue he should have brought it up during negotiations.
No not really co-promotion = no home fighter.

As for bringing it up before maybe so but you could also say Quigg should have brought up having to have the usual dressing room before its Scott making that demand, as far as I'm aware Framptons said neither of them has it no?
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by ste1983 »

SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
very one-sided view here I'm afraid my friend...
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
No, arrogance is flying round the country telling everyone I'm the A-side I'm the A-side. It's almost like they have to say it so they believe it. Fact is, neither in this country are household names and this fight will go a fair way to making that so, but Frampton isn't Ricky Hatton, and likely never will be.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:
SNG wrote:No, he should have negotiated that. This A-side nonsense tickles me, I was quite a fan till the build up of this show but their arrogance is frankly painful to watch, especially how smug they are about it.
Arrogance is Quigg stating "its my Arena"...
No, arrogance is flying round the country telling everyone I'm the A-side I'm the A-side. It's almost like they have to say it so they believe it. Fact is, neither in this country are household names and this fight will go a fair way to making that so, but Frampton isn't Ricky Hatton, and likely never will be.
But Frampton is the A-side though, It is Frampton vs. Quigg and he is getting a larger purse...
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
Something that Quigg isn't entitled to...
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

So it's not arrogance to fly round saying it? That makes it even worse that he's got it and keeps saying it.
SNG
Super Middleweight
Posts: 4703
Joined: 22 May 2013, 21:02

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by SNG »

Entitled?

Jesus.
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:So it's not arrogance to fly round saying it? That makes it even worse that he's got it and keeps saying it.
its not arrogance, its simply stating facts...
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1759
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by ste1983 »

SNG wrote:
ste1983 wrote:
SNG wrote:Why should neither of them have it? Cause Carl Frampton says so? Grow up. It's a dressing room, if you get so upset cause the other fighters dressing room is 'better' then you should have a word with yourself. I really hope Quigg doesn't cave, let Frampton call it off over a dressing room. It would be hilarious.
But shouldn't Quigg therefore 'have a word' with himself for insisting on having it in the first place?
No, Frampton is the one with the issue saying he wants something Quigg has got.
Again that can just as easily be spinned around to Quigg's got the issue saying he must have that room
wesshaw1985
Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Carl Frampton (IBF) vs. Scott Quigg (WBA) - February 27th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

SNG wrote:Entitled?

Jesus.
entitled -
believing oneself to be inherently deserving of privileges or special treatment.
Post Reply