keithmoonhangover wrote:If it's made up, tell me which bits are wrong. If you're not prepared to do that, then STFU.
It's none of your business.
I am a complete hard core fan for over 30 years but only casual poster and not part of your inner cliche here and so maybe am not entitled to comment on this, but who is this Horse person and why did he not answer the question? Does strike me as being as described and the unwillingness to defend himself with answers makes it seem like he was described bang on.
Thing with these forums, pretend big time charlies who are weird little men that are the type that come up to you at Tesco or the pub to talk and you just think think, "oh fck off please you stinky twat before someone sees me talking to you" and other posters are hugely accomplished boxing insiders or intelligent nice genuine people and you can never work which is which.
Oiky wrote:
quigg galagher and hearn talked too much. talking is one thing. you can talk as much as you want but quigg found out that however much you think you can best someone when they are actually in front of you looking as if they are actually about to merely have a sparring session its a different matter. all that talk and where was quigg? he was in the ring but may aswell not have been. his "dedication" he banged on about done f all for him in the biggest fight of his career. proving night tonight and he messed it right up, was frightened to get involved, wasn't commiting with feet and hips to punches, purely outclassed and he knew it from the opening bell . yeah frampton didnt get the stoppage i predicted but he is levels above quigg
I don't know how you can say Frampton is levels above Quigg.
Frampton did absolutely nothing in that fight. He never outboxed Quigg, he never hurt Quigg, all the major punches came from Quigg.
The only reason he won was because he did slightly more than Quigg for the first 6 rounds by throwing a handful of jabs whereas Quigg did eff all. Once Quigg started actually fighting, Frampton was all over the place.]
Frampton didn't win the fight. Quigg lost it.
He broke his jaw, that hurt him pretty badly.
yes, i too class breaking someones jaw and making them more tentative as hurting them
samwbr wrote:
He broke his jaw, that hurt him pretty badly.
Really?
Which round? Maybe I missed it but I didn't see Frampton land heavily on Quigg at all until the 11th/12th where he caught Quigg a couple of times.
Around the 4th I believe. Nothing was made of it during the fight though.
Completely missed that one. Although I was slipping into a bit of a stupor at that point after watching two blokes prance around doing nothing for 3 rounds.
I don't think his jaw was broken, he was talking in the corner and showed no distress and wax speaking post fight. No blood coming from his mouth etc - his jaw might have hurt but that's part of the job.
Counter-puncher wrote:I will believe his jaw was broken when an independent medical authority looks at the x rays and confirms it
yeah thats a fair comment but quigg, gallagher, and kugan cassius all mentioned it so if his jaw wasn't broken and he has mentioned that as another reason why his workrate and relentless punching we are using to seeing vs. far lesser opposition wasn't there, then that is even worse don't ya think? at least if his jaw was broken there is a reason...
Counter-puncher wrote:I will believe his jaw was broken when an independent medical authority looks at the x rays and confirms it
yeah thats a fair comment but quigg, gallagher, and kugan cassius all mentioned it so if his jaw wasn't broken and he has mentioned that as another reason why his workrate and relentless punching we are using to seeing vs. far lesser opposition wasn't there, then that is even worse don't ya think? at least if his jaw was broken there is a reason...
Oh I agree
And anyway it was apparently broken in the 4th
What's his excuse for doing fornicate-all in the first 3?
Counter-puncher wrote:I will believe his jaw was broken when an independent medical authority looks at the x rays and confirms it
yeah thats a fair comment but quigg, gallagher, and kugan cassius all mentioned it so if his jaw wasn't broken and he has mentioned that as another reason why his workrate and relentless punching we are using to seeing vs. far lesser opposition wasn't there, then that is even worse don't ya think? at least if his jaw was broken there is a reason...
Oh I agree
And anyway it was apparently broken in the 4th
What's his excuse for doing fornicate-all in the first 3?
my friend i'm as confused as you about the whole thing
tobyh5 wrote:I am a complete hard core fan for over 30 years but only casual poster and not part of your inner cliche here and so maybe am not entitled to comment on this, but who is this Horse person and why did he not answer the question? Does strike me as being as described and the unwillingness to defend himself with answers makes it seem like he was described bang on.
Thing with these forums, pretend big time charlies who are weird little men that are the type that come up to you at Tesco or the pub to talk and you just think think, "oh fck off please you stinky twat before someone sees me talking to you" and other posters are hugely accomplished boxing insiders or intelligent nice genuine people and you can never work which is which.
palooka wrote:I don't think his jaw was broken, he was talking in the corner and showed no distress and wax speaking post fight. No blood coming from his mouth etc - his jaw might have hurt but that's part of the job.
4th rd from a uppercut ,he did mention his jaw going after the fight but i just thought quigg was making excuses .
tobyh5 wrote:I am a complete hard core fan for over 30 years but only casual poster and not part of your inner cliche here and so maybe am not entitled to comment on this, but who is this Horse person and why did he not answer the question? Does strike me as being as described and the unwillingness to defend himself with answers makes it seem like he was described bang on.
Thing with these forums, pretend big time charlies who are weird little men that are the type that come up to you at Tesco or the pub to talk and you just think think, "oh fck off please you stinky twat before someone sees me talking to you" and other posters are hugely accomplished boxing insiders or intelligent nice genuine people and you can never work which is which.
tobyh5 wrote:I am a complete hard core fan for over 30 years but only casual poster and not part of your inner cliche here and so maybe am not entitled to comment on this, but who is this Horse person and why did he not answer the question? Does strike me as being as described and the unwillingness to defend himself with answers makes it seem like he was described bang on.
Thing with these forums, pretend big time charlies who are weird little men that are the type that come up to you at Tesco or the pub to talk and you just think think, "oh fck off please you stinky twat before someone sees me talking to you" and other posters are hugely accomplished boxing insiders or intelligent nice genuine people and you can never work which is which.
palooka wrote:I don't think his jaw was broken, he was talking in the corner and showed no distress and wax speaking post fight. No blood coming from his mouth etc - his jaw might have hurt but that's part of the job.
4th rd from a uppercut ,he did mention his jaw going after the fight but i just thought quigg was making excuses .
So his jaw was broken in the 4th?
Why did he spend so much time protecting it in rounds 1-3?
And if he did get it broken in the 4th, he needs to rethink his defense, because that's ALL he was doing and still got his jaw snapped
