Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Horse wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:That you're a bit dull.
How rude.
Apologies. No offence intended. Was just a knee jerk reaction to you enjoying the Fury fight more than last night. BDSM is in fashion nowadays. I respect your opinion and enjoy your p4p list every month.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Horse »

Stuarty30 wrote:Apologies. No offence intended. Was just a knee jerk reaction to you enjoying the Fury fight more than last night. BDSM is in fashion nowadays. I respect your opinion and enjoy your p4p list every month.
:TU:
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Tarkus »

It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by reggaereggae »

Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!! :lol: :lol: :lol: are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Naandrew wrote:He was also talking about how Galahad would beat them both which is ridiculous.

Have to say he made up for those stupid comments with this about AJ

https://mobile.twitter.com/WillHillBet/ ... 4116225024

:bow: :bow:
ha fuking hilarious, and true :bag:
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

reggaereggae wrote:
Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!! :lol: :lol: :lol: are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
punchers chance
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 694
Joined: 12 Jul 2005, 18:37

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by punchers chance »

Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Teddy's Toupee
Cruiserweight
Posts: 2903
Joined: 25 Sep 2010, 17:37

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Teddy's Toupee »

punchers chance wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Depends if it's made of glass
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by rd350lc »

punchers chance wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Don't come a knocking if the van is a rocking .
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

punchers chance wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
tigermoth87 wrote:I agree with him BUT, it was better than his fight with Wlad.
Agree. Shouldn't throw stones if you live in a glass house.....
What if you live in a caravan?
Glass caravans?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by handsofstone »

Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad

And i usually see the good in all things boxing :verysad:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Horse »

handsofstone wrote:Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad

And i usually see the good in all things boxing :verysad:
You didn't think the 2nd half was at least alright?
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by handsofstone »

Horse wrote:
handsofstone wrote:Neither Fury/Klitschko or Frampton/Quigg were classics but i did enjoy watching Fury's win,even being at the fight last night and being rat arsed pissed i could still tell the fight was shockingly bad

And i usually see the good in all things boxing :verysad:
You didn't think the 2nd half was at least alright?
It was better than the 1st half granted but so was Nelson/De Leon

I only liked 1 round the whole fight,cant remember what round it was exactly but it was the 1 where a fight broke out
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by BitPlayer »

Remember he called it made his comment just after Round 8, at which point it was far worse than his and Wlad's fight which had more punches and far more movement (not to mention Fury's antics in the ring) from people shifting around about double the weight one of which was almost 40. It did get better is the last rounds but in the end Frampton and Quigg landed just under the number of punches Fury landed on Wlad from the totals I've seen,
Last edited by BitPlayer on 29 Feb 2016, 07:57, edited 1 time in total.
Ricky_
Middleweight
Posts: 8896
Joined: 16 Oct 2013, 08:03

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Ricky_ »

:lol: as bad as FrampQuigg was, it was infinitely more exciting than watching those 2 overgrown mongos fumble about the ring doing literally nothing for 12 rounds.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Tarkus »

reggaereggae wrote:
Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!! :lol: :lol: :lol: are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Probably other way around. Probably I was not pissed out of my head like lot of you and so I could appreciate the finer art of boxing. :OhYes:
taffytoon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 17 Nov 2009, 18:15

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by taffytoon »

Horse wrote:
taffytoon wrote:The only sex he has is with himself; putting the toe clippers into the equation spices things up :clap:
What started your obsession with me?

Was it when I insulted Nathan Cleverly's reign as WBO champion?
God no; I have known you to be a pudendum way before that :TU:
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by J »

Teddy's Toupee wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
Tarkus wrote:It was a great fight. I enjoyed it thoroughly. Then again I did not pay a penny. Half of the twitter was moaning how bad it was. lol Thats what boxing is. People just want a barroom brawl. And to think for idiot Fury to complain about the lack of action after 12 rounds of running with Klit. Once again he shows what a hypocrite pudendum he is.
It was a great fight??!! :lol: :lol: :lol: are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.

squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Tarkus »

J wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote:
reggaereggae wrote:
It was a great fight??!! :lol: :lol: :lol: are you serious? Were you smoking crack whilst you were watching it? That s the only explanation I can think of considering this damp squid of a fight.....
Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.

squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
To continue this fascinating topic. Actually squid is rarely damp, as it is impossible to be damp while in the water. And a damp squid out of the water is indeed a terrible sight.
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by J »

SO THATS THAT SORTED,

soaking squid then, as in show us your soaking squid love...

and damp squib, as in her soaking squid was a bit of a damp squib. :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :zzz: :clap:
J
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 8015
Joined: 17 Feb 2004, 12:39

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by J »

yes I know I need help.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Fury Rant RE: Frampton/Quigg

Post by Stuarty »

Tarkus wrote:
J wrote:
Teddy's Toupee wrote: Surely squid are always damp, they live in the sea.
common mistake lol...I think he meant damp squib.

squib being a type of dynamite stick, being damp doesn't go off.
To continue this fascinating topic. Actually squid is rarely damp, as it is impossible to be damp while in the water. And a damp squid out of the water is indeed a terrible sight.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Post Reply