Autism

Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Autism

Post by Counter-puncher »

Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.
Who isn't?
So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, :TU:'. ?
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Autism

Post by davie »

Counter-puncher wrote:
davie wrote:
Horse wrote:Charming.
Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.
'a bit of a fanny sometimes' isn't too rude or unfair, IMO.

But then most of us can be a bit of a fanny sometimes, over something.

Or, say, 'a bit of a berk'. Thats fair enough where most of us are concerned, at some point or other :TU:
I'm a fanny sometimes too, occasionally a propper whalloper.
Not sure I've ever been a berk though.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Autism

Post by Horse »

Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, :TU:'. ?
Probably not.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Autism

Post by davie »

Horse wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, :TU:'. ?
Probably not.
You're nothing if not predictable.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Autism

Post by Counter-puncher »

I'm not sure I'm a fanny on here, but I'm definitely sometimes a bit of a berk, or a bit of a twat.

In my defence its probably mostly related to PIGG, who is a known gaping chasm of a pudendum, so, you know.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Autism

Post by Counter-puncher »

Horse wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:So if some time I say, 'horse this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion', is it likely to make you consider rethinking your approach or position?

Or at least get a 'ok, :TU:'. ?
Probably not.
Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

:lol: :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Autism

Post by Horse »

davie wrote:You're nothing if not predictable.
Yet you didn't predict my first post in this thread.

Aha!
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Autism

Post by Counter-puncher »

:lol: Horse made a funny
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Autism

Post by Horse »

Counter-puncher wrote:Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

:lol: :TU:
Then maybe I should consider rethinking my approach and position. :TU:
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Autism

Post by watsupdoc87 »

yez are all a pack of jelly bean retards :bag:
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Autism

Post by Counter-puncher »

Horse wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Horse, this is one of those issues where you're being a bit of a fanny, in my opinion

:lol: :TU:
Then maybe I should consider rethinking my approach and position. :TU:

This has the appearance of social interaction, almost.

In your face, kingfield. :lol:
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Autism

Post by thepocketrocket »

In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Autism

Post by watsupdoc87 »

thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson :bag:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Autism

Post by Rexob »

watsupdoc87 wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson :bag:

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Autism

Post by thepocketrocket »

watsupdoc87 wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson :bag:
He doesn't like flying, but like Calzaghe, that would pass when Tyson was old, shot, and there for the taking! :clap:
thepocketrocket
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3283
Joined: 16 Jan 2003, 06:26

Re: Autism

Post by thepocketrocket »

Rexob wrote:
watsupdoc87 wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson :bag:

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?
Nooooooooooooooo LOL
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Autism

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Rexob wrote:
watsupdoc87 wrote:
thepocketrocket wrote:In the end, i think people get frustrated. this is the only place we can come to chat (bar those of us who know our local pro gym and fighters) and not have to discuss boxing with people who want to debate if Mr T beats Mike Tyson. When people are contrary just for the sake of it, some will get pissed off.
mr t cant drink milk without falling asleep, no way he beats tyson :bag:

Who wins a 1985, Mr T or 1985, Tyson?
1985, easy, rocky beats them both after defeating drago, actually hed already beaten cluber lange at that point i think :bag:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Autism

Post by Rexob »

Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Autism

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)
what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon :bag:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17107
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Autism

Post by keithmoonhangover »

watsupdoc87 wrote:
Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)
what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon :bag:
I blame Chuck Wepner. :TU:
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Autism

Post by Boxerbeetle »

watsupdoc87 wrote:
Rexob wrote:Yeah, I don't think Mr T (Clubber) ever got over the second Rocky fight, so Tyson coming up in 85, would have done a job on
Mr T (Clubber)
what i dont get is how did rocky ever get his title shot in the first place, i thought you had to be top 15 ranked, but appolo creed just picked the italian stalion out of a big bunch of names, and his record wasnt good enough to be top 15. i blame al haymon :bag:
Duh. It's obviously because without a ranked contender what the fight needed was a novelty. And it was being held in the land of opportunity, right? :yay:
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Autism

Post by Stuarty »

davie wrote:
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:As I've said above. There's plenty you can call Horse.
Charming.
Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.
:lol: :lol:
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Autism

Post by davie »

Ahhhh, I'm glad this thread ended well.

It had the potential to go badly wrong
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: Autism

Post by palooka »

Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.
Who isn't?
Yo mamma :maybe:
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: Autism

Post by whiskey »

palooka wrote:
Horse wrote:
davie wrote:Well they're right enough, you can be a fanny sometimes.
Who isn't?
Yo mamma :maybe:
Yo mamma's plug has arrived.

Image
Post Reply