I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.Tanzio wrote:Yes we can. Wilder is an HW. The (worthless) belt he holds is for HW. HW is unlimited. 3G's belts are for MW. 160 is the weight limit for MW. Ward, Kovalev and Beterbiev are LHWs, two weight classes up.Undefeated49-0 wrote:Same thing can be said about GGG, he can get paid stupid money to take big fights with Ward, Beterbiev and Kovalev but he decides to stay at MW where he is being allowed to feast on Bums because none of the other guys with straps will fight him; have your Promoter move you up so you get the best fights then.Larrylefthook wrote:But he can pay fighters stupid money to take easy fights so they don't need to fight the best, just look at Wilder and Garcia.
I'm not throwing shade, just making a comparison. We cannot say it is ok for Triple G but not ok for Wilder when Deontay is fighting men who outweigh him as much as 25-30lbs or more.
Team Wilder has made a career (so far) of avoiding the best in the HW div. 3G has avoided no one at MW. They are avoiding him.
Your comparison is utter sh!t.
If you and Wilder feel that the HW div is unfair for him, get off your secretarial spread ass and start a movement to change it.
Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
-
Larrylefthook
- Welterweight
- Posts: 216
- Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 11:03
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
I refuse to put anyone on ignore. I also will never report anyone.Larrylefthook wrote:I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.Tanzio wrote:Yes we can. Wilder is an HW. The (worthless) belt he holds is for HW. HW is unlimited. 3G's belts are for MW. 160 is the weight limit for MW. Ward, Kovalev and Beterbiev are LHWs, two weight classes up.Undefeated49-0 wrote:
Same thing can be said about GGG, he can get paid stupid money to take big fights with Ward, Beterbiev and Kovalev but he decides to stay at MW where he is being allowed to feast on Bums because none of the other guys with straps will fight him; have your Promoter move you up so you get the best fights then.
I'm not throwing shade, just making a comparison. We cannot say it is ok for Triple G but not ok for Wilder when Deontay is fighting men who outweigh him as much as 25-30lbs or more.
Team Wilder has made a career (so far) of avoiding the best in the HW div. 3G has avoided no one at MW. They are avoiding him.
Your comparison is utter sh!t.
If you and Wilder feel that the HW div is unfair for him, get off your secretarial spread ass and start a movement to change it.
-
Larrylefthook
- Welterweight
- Posts: 216
- Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 11:03
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
I would have no problem in reporting someone for racism, if everyone let everything go like you the world would be a horrible place.Tanzio wrote:I refuse to put anyone on ignore. I also will never report anyone.Larrylefthook wrote:I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.Tanzio wrote: Yes we can. Wilder is an HW. The (worthless) belt he holds is for HW. HW is unlimited. 3G's belts are for MW. 160 is the weight limit for MW. Ward, Kovalev and Beterbiev are LHWs, two weight classes up.
Team Wilder has made a career (so far) of avoiding the best in the HW div. 3G has avoided no one at MW. They are avoiding him.
Your comparison is utter sh!t.
If you and Wilder feel that the HW div is unfair for him, get off your secretarial spread ass and start a movement to change it.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Larrylefthook wrote:I would have no problem in reporting someone for racism, if everyone let everything go like you the world would be a horrible place.Tanzio wrote:I refuse to put anyone on ignore. I also will never report anyone.Larrylefthook wrote: I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.
-
Larrylefthook
- Welterweight
- Posts: 216
- Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 11:03
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Haha okTanzio wrote:Larrylefthook wrote:I would have no problem in reporting someone for racism, if everyone let everything go like you the world would be a horrible place.Tanzio wrote: I refuse to put anyone on ignore. I also will never report anyone.I don't let things go. I make them go . . . away.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Concerning racism, IMO, it is better to fully illuminate distasteful views and counter them publicly rather than shun and hide the cancerous thinking. People need to be exposed to the reality that repugnant people and their sh!t thinking exists in the light of day rather than in a dark corner where they are more likely to be seduced.Larrylefthook wrote:Haha okTanzio wrote:Larrylefthook wrote: I would have no problem in reporting someone for racism, if everyone let everything go like you the world would be a horrible place.I don't let things go. I make them go . . . away.
The worst of the cancer must be removed.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
If that's what you want to do then that's your right. I'm here talking boxing, it is a very fair comparison in that both men aren't fighting the top dogs of their weight classes and it isn't like both aren't able to take on better challenges (GGG just have to move up to get his), whereas Wilder is fighting bigger fighters than himself as far as the weight goes but he's just not fighting the best.Larrylefthook wrote:I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.
I'm not so sure why that is being racist to you when I've been equally critical of Wilder as I have of GGG, you are welcome to ignore me however much you want but I feel I said nothing racist towards GGG at all.
You don't agree then that is fine.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
I doubt that his suggestion that we ignore you had anything to do with racism. Racism only came up after I said that I would never put anyone on ignore or report them.Undefeated49-0 wrote:If that's what you want to do then that's your right. I'm here talking boxing, it is a very fair comparison in that both men aren't fighting the top dogs of their weight classes and it isn't like both aren't able to take on better challenges (GGG just have to move up to get his), whereas Wilder is fighting bigger fighters than himself as far as the weight goes but he's just not fighting the best.Larrylefthook wrote:I think its best everyone set him to ignore, that comparison with GGG and Wilder is just unbelievable.
I'm not so sure why that is being racist to you when I've been equally critical of Wilder as I have of GGG, you are welcome to ignore me however much you want but I feel I said nothing racist towards GGG at all.
You don't agree then that is fine.
I believe that his suggestion that we all ignore you was based on his opinion that you are a pathetic, shameless troll.
I disagree with him. You just aren't very bright, to be kind, and your comparison of Wilder with 3G demonstrates your luminescence.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Honestly this is the best you can do, hurl insults when you are by far the lamest on this forum. Conspiracy Theories of Manny and Floyd supposedly choreographing a Waltz (as you put it) in order to get a rematch is the DUMBEST thing I've ever read here.Tanzio wrote:I doubt that his suggestion that we ignore you had anything to do with racism. Racism only came up after I said that I would never put anyone on ignore or report them.
I believe that his suggestion that we all ignore you was based on his opinion that you are a pathetic, shameless troll.
I disagree with him. You just aren't very bright, to be kind, and your comparison of Wilder with 3G demonstrates your luminescence.
Congrats you take the cake/prize and have surpassed Bnovelist as BoxRec's all time greatest dumb ass.
Oh and on top of that you're a piece of sh*t too.
Back to talking boxing; Crawford is trying to step up but he has Arum as his Promoter and how can one expect Bob not to milk his cashcows when he is already complaining that Haymon is paying his fighters too much money as he put it.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Undefeated49-0 wrote:Conspiracy Theories of Manny and Floyd supposedly choreographing a Waltz (as you put it) in order to get a rematch is the DUMBEST thing I've ever read here.Tanzio wrote:I doubt that his suggestion that we ignore you had anything to do with racism. Racism only came up after I said that I would never put anyone on ignore or report them.
I believe that his suggestion that we all ignore you was based on his opinion that you are a pathetic, shameless troll.
I disagree with him. You just aren't very bright, to be kind, and your comparison of Wilder with 3G demonstrates your luminescence.
The "DUMBEST" thing I've ever read on here is you trying to explain to me how much your school students love you;
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=198455Undefeated49-0 wrote: The State trusts me because I've earned it, my kids love me and they write nice letters and tell me how much they do and how much they appreciate me.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
#1. I have based my opinion of the Pac v FMJ farce on the sum of the events to date.Undefeated49-0 wrote:Honestly this is the best you can do, hurl insults when you are by far the lamest on this forum. Conspiracy Theories of Manny and Floyd supposedly choreographing a Waltz (as you put it) in order to get a rematch is the DUMBEST thing I've ever read here.Tanzio wrote:I doubt that his suggestion that we ignore you had anything to do with racism. Racism only came up after I said that I would never put anyone on ignore or report them.
I believe that his suggestion that we all ignore you was based on his opinion that you are a pathetic, shameless troll.
I disagree with him. You just aren't very bright, to be kind, and your comparison of Wilder with 3G demonstrates your luminescence.
Congrats you take the cake/prize and have surpassed Bnovelist as BoxRec's all time greatest dumb ass.
Oh and on top of that you're a piece of sh*t too.
#2. I consider your opinion of me and my opinions a compliment.
I don't think that what "Haymon is paying his fighters" is a reason that Arum milks "his cashcows." Bob was doing that way before Haymon came on the scene.Back to talking boxing; Crawford is trying to step up but he has Arum as his Promoter and how can one expect Bob not to milk his cashcows when he is already complaining that Haymon is paying his fighters too much money as he put it.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
1. Whatever IdiotTanzio wrote:#1. I have based my opinion of the Pac v FMJ farce on the sum of the events to date.
#2. I consider your opinion of me and my opinions a compliment.
I don't think that what "Haymon is paying his fighters" is a reason that Arum milks "his cashcows." Bob was doing that way before Haymon came on the scene.
2. Sure you do Idiot
3. FYI Sh*tbag, I wasn't suggesting that as the reason why Arum milks his cashcows. If that's what you walked away with then your reading comprehension is lower than whale sh*t. Dumbo.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Actually, turB, that is exactly what the combination of words that you spewed said. If it is not what you meant, it is purely your fault.Undefeated49-0 wrote:1. Whatever IdiotTanzio wrote:#1. I have based my opinion of the Pac v FMJ farce on the sum of the events to date.
#2. I consider your opinion of me and my opinions a compliment.
I don't think that what "Haymon is paying his fighters" is a reason that Arum milks "his cashcows." Bob was doing that way before Haymon came on the scene.
2. Sure you do Idiot
3. FYI Sh*tbag, I wasn't suggesting that as the reason why Arum milks his cashcows. If that's what you walked away with then your reading comprehension is lower than whale sh*t. Dumbo.
Maybe one of those children that you babysit would be willing to tutor you on English usage.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Tutor deezTanzio wrote:Actually, turB, that is exactly what the combination of words that you spewed said. If it is not what you meant, it is purely your fault.
Maybe one of those children that you babysit would be willing to tutor you on English usage.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Maybe your tutor could also serve as your interpreter.Undefeated49-0 wrote:Tutor deezTanzio wrote:Actually, turB, that is exactly what the combination of words that you spewed said. If it is not what you meant, it is purely your fault.
Maybe one of those children that you babysit would be willing to tutor you on English usage.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
The only one who needs an interpreter is your illiterate ass.Tanzio wrote:Maybe your tutor could also serve as your interpreter.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Nice to see you still haven't gotten yourself a REAL job yet, huh Mr. I get paid to Photoshop things.Ricky_ wrote:http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=198455
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Since you claim that you do not need an interpreter, turB, could you explain how your statement above does not suggest that Bob's "cashcow" milking habits are directly related to what Haymon pays his fighters?Undefeated49-0 wrote: Back to talking boxing; Crawford is trying to step up but he has Arum as his Promoter and how can one expect Bob not to milk his cashcows when he is already complaining that Haymon is paying his fighters too much money as he put it.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
It's pretty clear that the two aren't related but somehow in your own idiocy you can't see that a relationship between the two statements were not the intent in the first place. You keep wanting to tie the two together somehow and for one to give meaning to the other but that's just it, they're opposites.Tanzio wrote:Since you claim that you do not need an interpreter, turB, could you explain how your statement above does not suggest that Bob's "cashcow" milking habits are directly related to what Haymon pays his fighters?
Bob wants to keep all his cash in house, Haymon is paying his fighters far more than they're worth, it's clear as day I was showing the differences between the two but just somehow not to you.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Just back from a client lunch. Signed a gig today for a series of product backdrops for some television features. What did you do today? Did you manage to keep calm sergeant kieth?Undefeated49-0 wrote:Nice to see you still haven't gotten yourself a REAL job yet, huh Mr. I get paid to Photoshop things.Ricky_ wrote:http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=198455
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Sure you did Turd, prove it.Ricky_ wrote:Just back from a client lunch. Signed a gig today for a series of product backdrops for some television features. What did you do today? Did you manage to keep calm sergeant kieth?
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Why? Because you care so much about my career? Keep calm, Keith.Undefeated49-0 wrote:Sure you did Turd, prove it.Ricky_ wrote:Just back from a client lunch. Signed a gig today for a series of product backdrops for some television features. What did you do today? Did you manage to keep calm sergeant kieth?
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Because you didn't believe me, so nor will I believe you until you prove it.Ricky_ wrote:Why? Because you care so much about my career? Keep calm, Keith.
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
You have a problem with admitting when you are clearly mistaken, and simply making a correction. Of course, you would have to understand what your words actually said in order to do that, which you clearly do not.Undefeated49-0 wrote:It's pretty clear that the two aren't related but somehow in your own idiocy you can't see that a relationship between the two statements were not the intent in the first place. You keep wanting to tie the two together somehow and for one to give meaning to the other but that's just it, they're opposites.Tanzio wrote:Since you claim that you do not need an interpreter, turB, could you explain how your statement above does not suggest that Bob's "cashcow" milking habits are directly related to what Haymon pays his fighters?
Bob wants to keep all his cash in house, Haymon is paying his fighters far more than they're worth, it's clear as day I was showing the differences between the two but just somehow not to you.
Claiming you meant something that you failed to communicate and that if the reader does not guess what you meant we are at fault once again demonstrates your ignorance.
It was not clear as day what you were thinking because you failed to accurately communicate it. If you did not accuse pretty much everyone who disagrees with you of being "stupid" or "idiots" it would be less of an issue.
-
Undefeated49-0
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: 13 Nov 2015, 14:36
Re: Terence “Bud” Crawford - Time to step up
Tanzio wrote:You have a problem with admitting when you are clearly mistaken, and simply making a correction. Of course, you would have to understand what your words actually said in order to do that, which you clearly do not.
Claiming you meant something that you failed to communicate and that if the reader does not guess what you meant we are at fault once again demonstrates your ignorance.
It was not clear as day what you were thinking because you failed to accurately communicate it. If you did not accuse pretty much everyone who disagrees with you of being "stupid" or "idiots" it would be less of an issue.
I articulated what I meant clearly, don't blame your lack of comprehension on me. Your inability to articulate it clearly is based on some preconceived ASSumption you had.