Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
-
simonwalsh
- Middleweight
- Posts: 146
- Joined: 05 May 2014, 08:40
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Just finished watching it on catch up. Amazed at Sky in the 11th saying "Skeete is boxing like he's got this in the bag, he might be in for a shock" (or words to that effect).
I had Skeete winning comfortably by a wide margin. I only gave Eggington three rounds.
I had Skeete winning comfortably by a wide margin. I only gave Eggington three rounds.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
-
mickey1975
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 23139
- Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Stylewise Skeete was always going to be a nightmare for Eggington.
Eggington is a young man and can still come back, although I doubt he will ever do much above domestic level.
Skeete looked good, good jab, good footwork, took some good shots too. Onwards and upwards for Bradley
Eggington is a young man and can still come back, although I doubt he will ever do much above domestic level.
Skeete looked good, good jab, good footwork, took some good shots too. Onwards and upwards for Bradley
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Had £5k on it with Andy Ayling, who was straight over to him at the end of the fight.mickey1975 wrote:Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Barry probably had Eddie take it out of Sams purseexpe wrote:Had £5k on it with Andy Ayling, who was straight over to him at the end of the fight.mickey1975 wrote:Yes, Barry Hearn thought he was unbeatable.Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
No, it was terrible.Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Disgusted by Barry Hearns comments,publicly questioning the commitment of Eggington.He's probably trying to give Eggington a kick up the arse but those. Comments were uncalled for IMO
-
Larrylefthook
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 216
- Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 11:03
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Seriously shocked how some people did not enjoy and appreciate Skeete's performance last night, he boxed beautifully to his strengths what do people expect? He doesn't have any strength or power to be going forward so there's no point in it, why play into your opponents strengths just to please some fans, it would be stupid. If you want to see more action go and watch Lucas Browne.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Boxing & moving is not the same as running away.Horse wrote:No, it was terrible.Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Skeete put on a good performance of the former. He stood there, drew the punch, dodged & countered, before moving on to keep his opponent from setting his feet. Excellent boxing.
Obviously not everyone's cup of tea but definitely NOT running away.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highlyHorse wrote:No, it was terrible.Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly
Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
I was on the fence to be honest. I thought they would both pick up rounds and it would end up coming down to the last four but Skeete was always in control. As I was watching it I was thinking 'why didn't I see this was going to happen'! Hindsight is a wonderful thing I suppose. I like Eggington so I was probably a bit bias beforehand. He's young and fearless and has done things the hard way. Was exposed last night but I hope he can come again. He's certainly young enough.Boxerbeetle wrote:It was a very predictable result, Eggington is absolutely made for Skeete. Did anyone really predict anything other than a Skeete points win?
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.Horse wrote:Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly
Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Who Horse? Never!! He's the most level headed, impartial poster on this forum and we should have more like him!! Carlsberg don't do bulls***.......keithmoonhangover wrote:You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.Horse wrote:Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly
Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
-
Boxerbeetle
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 32967
- Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Fury only landed 86 total punches in the entire fight. Relatively speaking, Skeete was more entertaining against Eggington than Fury was against Wlad.Horse wrote:Fury beat ATG W. Klitschko. Skeete beat Eggington.Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highly
Fury landed more power punches than jabs, I doubt that Skeete did the same.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
If Skeete had just beaten Manny Pacquiao in the same manner then I'd be lauding him.keithmoonhangover wrote:You're not in the slightest bit biased are you.
He didn't though did he? He beat Sam Eggington.
He got a good domestic win by jabbing a lot on the back foot. Not really a performance worth going on about.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
To you maybe.Boxerbeetle wrote:Fury only landed 86 total punches in the entire fight. Relatively speaking, Skeete was more entertaining against Eggington than Fury was against Wlad.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17105
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Well, why don't you shut up then.Horse wrote:Not really a performance worth going on about.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
I'm responding to other people's posts.keithmoonhangover wrote:Well, why don't you shut up then.
Stop talking to me.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Spot-on assesment HorseHorse wrote:No, it was terrible.Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
and I have to agree with this too ,if anything Skeete engaged ever so slightly more and didn't showboat as much , very similar in the negativity stakes .Boxerbeetle wrote:Sounds remarkably similar to Fury's performance against Wlad which you rate so highlyHorse wrote:No, it was terrible.Shambles wrote:No, Skeete dominated, it was good to watch.
Skeete ran away and was reluctant to throw anything apart from his jab. Not my idea of domination.
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
rd350lc wrote:Spot-on assesment Horse, had it maybe 2-3 round to Skeete
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Malignaggi is generally entertaining when he has a decent opponent.Pulmo Bailly wrote:How about this for a thriller?
Bradley Skeete vs Paulie Malignaggi
One for the 'purists' as they say
Re: Sam Eggington vs. Bradley Skeete and undercard
Nice one Pulmo , i'm hand weeding my block paving that night .Pulmo Bailly wrote:How about this for a thriller?
Bradley Skeete vs Paulie Malignaggi
One for the 'purists' as they say