Yes We Can wrote:Whilst Wlad may be a far more impressive specimen visually (no homo) , i'd be willing to put my neck out and say Fury is the fitter man of the 2, especially in regards to boxing related stamina.
Appearences can often be deceptive, and whilst i admit there have been several time Tyson has more than let himself down, when he is in a big fight he really does perform like he is in terrific shape. Do you think he got to the top on technical skills alone?
i started the thread to get opinions like
yours. i for one think wlad is a tremendous
athlete and i do not think at his age his
physique comes naturally without hard work.
i figure he is a gym rat and spends sbstantial
time to be in shape in and out of camp. but
you have a very good point in looks might
be deceiving.
stamina wise i am not sure. wlad-fury did not
require too much. they neither bounced, nor
hit, nor had to absorb punishment. they basically
stood in front of each other for 36 minutes.
i think fights can be very different in terms of
required stamina. in recent years i developed
the prejudice that heavies don't work much.
seeing people clearly overweight like arreola
or samuel peter in title fights felt
very different
from holy or mike tyson.
i was wrong with fury from the get go, very
easily i'm being totally wrong again with
questioning his fitness.