What's your views about Froch warnings?

Davidreed
Welterweight
Posts: 125
Joined: 01 Dec 2015, 02:41

What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Davidreed »

In Froch recent statements he clearly warns Joshua that as he's thinking things will not be as simple against Martin. Here is the story
http://combatsportsnews.tumblr.com/post ... st-charles
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by stevedoc »

It's a decent assessment by froch martin will fancy it he's a big unbeaten puncher who could make a big name for himself as well as a lot of money,plus froch is a sky sports member now so he's not going to say easy fight he's going to make it sound like a 50/50 fight to sell it.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23139
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by mickey1975 »

Funnily enough, I reckon Smith, Moore, Watt, McCrory, Oliver and Nelson will have similar opinions, all week long on various shows leading up to April 9th. Just a hunch.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Counter-puncher »

mickey1975 wrote:Funnily enough, I reckon Smith, Moore, Watt, McCrory, Oliver and Nelson will have similar opinions, all week long on various shows leading up to April 9th. Just a hunch.
:lol:
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by keirw »

Froch knows better than most how dangerous an undefeated, hungry, young fighter with a big punch can be.
But I feel Joshua is the bigger dangermen in this fight and Martin is gonna be in big trouble, unless he shows us something he hasn't before.
BigSexy
Welterweight
Posts: 78
Joined: 08 Mar 2016, 03:42

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by BigSexy »

mickey1975 wrote:Funnily enough, I reckon Smith, Moore, Watt, McCrory, Oliver and Nelson will have similar opinions, all week long on various shows leading up to April 9th. Just a hunch.
:OhYes: :OhYes:
m1kee50
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4518
Joined: 04 Sep 2006, 11:07

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by m1kee50 »

keirw wrote:Froch knows better than most how dangerous an undefeated, hungry, young fighter with a big punch can be.
But I feel Joshua is the bigger dangermen in this fight and Martin is gonna be in big trouble, unless he shows us something he hasn't before.
Spot on

there's little point anyone, least of all AJ, deluding themselves that this is a walkover. Yes he can dig. Is there a man out there who can take that dig? Yes. there always is.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Counter-puncher »

One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by PredatorHayds »

It's the toughest fight of his career as I feel Martin is slightly better than Whyte.
It's definetly not a gimme but I weigh it 80/20 in Joshua's favour purely based on his potential and the fact Martin is unproven aswell.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Martin isn't very good and this will be blindingly obvious, very quickly, in their fight.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by ste1983 »

mickey1975 wrote:Funnily enough, I reckon Smith, Moore, Watt, McCrory, Oliver and Nelson will have similar opinions, all week long on various shows leading up to April 9th. Just a hunch.
:TU:
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 23139
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by mickey1975 »

Eddie will have paid a fortune to get Martin here. He'll recoup it with several soft defences on PPV at The O2. It's blindingly obvious.
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by olij999 »

Davidreed wrote:In Froch recent statements he clearly warns Joshua that as he's thinking things will not be as simple against Martin. Here is the story
http://combatsportsnews.tumblr.com/post ... st-charles
David - out of interest, is this another blog by the same author as the one mentioned in the following CS thread - http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=198731 ?
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Rexob »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Martin isn't very good and this will be blindingly obvious, very quickly, in their fight.

Yeah this, has anyone actually watched this guy fight? He stumbles all over the place, his technique is terrible and is just a plodder! if joshua doesn't blow Martin out inside 5 round I would be very surprised! I'm not saying joshua is the finished article but he is way above this level of opponent.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by lefty »

Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
Feck off! That's all natural .....
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by lefty »

Rexob wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Martin isn't very good and this will be blindingly obvious, very quickly, in their fight.

Yeah this, has anyone actually watched this guy fight? He stumbles all over the place, his technique is terrible and is just a plodder! if joshua doesn't blow Martin out inside 5 round I would be very surprised! I'm not saying joshua is the finished article but he is way above this level of opponent.
I disagree. I think Joshua should deal with him but I also think he's better than some think he is. Time will tell though. A big factor in this fight will also be what kind of chin has Martin got. He's gonna have to absorb some bombs even if he was to win so whether he can stand up to that should be interesting.
Taansend
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 12051
Joined: 10 Jul 2004, 17:38

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Taansend »

I have this a 50/50 fight.

I hope I'm wrong and you lot are right :-?
whiskey
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11956
Joined: 27 Mar 2007, 14:52

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by whiskey »

Davidreed wrote:In Froch recent statements he clearly warns Joshua that as he's thinking things will not be as simple against Martin. Here is the story
http://combatsportsnews.tumblr.com/post ... st-charles
This is just click bait.

The actual story is on Adam Smith's column.
Matt W
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1605
Joined: 28 Aug 2007, 10:14

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Matt W »

I've only seen a few minutes of Martin on Youtube and it was enough to convince me that Joshua will hammer him. From what I've seen his technique is awful and he holds his chin in the air. Reckon Joshua KOs him early.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Tomasino »

Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility

:lol:
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by reggaereggae »

Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
:lol:
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Stuarty »

Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
Big Danny Williams was off his tits on bakewell slices
olij999
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1242
Joined: 14 Jun 2004, 08:22

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by olij999 »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
Big Danny Williams was off his tits on bakewell slices
Stuarty30, is the bakewell slice reference a fact? I know Danny said that he loved "Mr. Kipling cakes" and that that phrase seems to have passed from one interview to the next through the joy of cut-and-paste, judging by google. But (and this is vaguely important to me at least) did Danny ever specify which cakes he particularly favoured? The Mr. Kipling range is so wide (see http://www.mrkipling.co.uk/our-range#easter-treats and scroll down), he can't have liked it all - no man can like the Euro-weirdness of Battenberg, the chemical sweetness of a fondant fancy and the faux ruggedness of a country slice. If Danny has shown his hand and admitted the bakewell slice is a favourite, he is clearly a man of taste. But this is clearly an area where we need more hard facts.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Counter-puncher »

olij999 wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:One thing we know about AJ, he will #stayhumble

6'5" 18 stone men who are really good at fighting and off their tits on testosterone are well known for their humility
Big Danny Williams was off his tits on bakewell slices
Stuarty30, is the bakewell slice reference a fact? I know Danny said that he loved "Mr. Kipling cakes" and that that phrase seems to have passed from one interview to the next through the joy of cut-and-paste, judging by google. But (and this is vaguely important to me at least) did Danny ever specify which cakes he particularly favoured? The Mr. Kipling range is so wide (see http://www.mrkipling.co.uk/our-range#easter-treats and scroll down), he can't have liked it all - no man can like the Euro-weirdness of Battenberg, the chemical sweetness of a fondant fancy and the faux ruggedness of a country slice. If Danny has shown his hand and admitted the bakewell slice is a favourite, he is clearly a man of taste. But this is clearly an area where we need more hard facts.

:lol: :lol:
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: What's your views about Froch warnings?

Post by Dixonian »

mickey1975 wrote:Funnily enough, I reckon Smith, Moore, Watt, McCrory, Oliver and Nelson will have similar opinions, all week long on various shows leading up to April 9th. Just a hunch.
:oo
Post Reply