WBA interim world titles

Post Reply
Kevinabatchelor
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6
Joined: 13 Feb 2012, 08:05

WBA interim world titles

Post by Kevinabatchelor »

Suggest you indicate when a vacant interim title is being contested, as is protocol for any other vacant title.
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: WBA interim world titles

Post by claudevsq »

Nope, because an interim title cannot be "vacant", as it does not exist per se. It can only be free, or occupied, but not vacant. The WBA will anyways not fill free interim titles anymore... I know they said this twice before, but GJM's son, who is the president of WBA, seems to go serious about it. Same also for Super titles, which are not vacant either... If nobody holds a Super title in a given weight class, then, at that moment, it simply does not exist. Only "regular" titles can be vacant. :TU:
Pigeons
Middleweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 21:29

Re: WBA interim world titles

Post by Pigeons »

claudevsq wrote:Nope, because an interim title cannot be "vacant", as it does not exist per se. It can only be free, or occupied, but not vacant. The WBA will anyways not fill free interim titles anymore... I know they said this twice before, but GJM's son, who is the president of WBA, seems to go serious about it. Same also for Super titles, which are not vacant either... If nobody holds a Super title in a given weight class, then, at that moment, it simply does not exist. Only "regular" titles can be vacant. :TU:
http://boxrec.com/show/573420
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: WBA interim world titles

Post by Offal »

claudevsq wrote:Nope, because an interim title cannot be "vacant", as it does not exist per se. It can only be free, or occupied, but not vacant. TU:
Free, occupied .... worthless :TU:
Pigeons
Middleweight
Posts: 52
Joined: 18 Sep 2013, 21:29

Re: WBA interim world titles

Post by Pigeons »

claudevsq wrote:Nope, because an interim title cannot be "vacant", as it does not exist per se. It can only be free, or occupied, but not vacant. The WBA will anyways not fill free interim titles anymore... I know they said this twice before, but GJM's son, who is the president of WBA, seems to go serious about it. Same also for Super titles, which are not vacant either... If nobody holds a Super title in a given weight class, then, at that moment, it simply does not exist. Only "regular" titles can be vacant. :TU:
Claude, I found some more:
http://boxrec.com/show/6613
http://boxrec.com/show/8521
http://boxrec.com/show/10233
http://boxrec.com/show/84083
http://boxrec.com/show/305515
http://boxrec.com/show/464399
http://boxrec.com/show/490731
http://boxrec.com/show/546846
http://boxrec.com/show/569411
http://boxrec.com/show/599168
http://boxrec.com/show/614764
http://boxrec.com/show/639296
claudevsq
Editor
Editor
Posts: 3332
Joined: 19 Jun 2007, 14:35

Re: WBA interim world titles

Post by claudevsq »

:TU:
Post Reply