Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Great?

Yes, he is a top 100 great
15
68%
No, he is not in that class
7
32%
 
Total votes: 22

elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by elmersalsa »

Is Oscar De La Hoya an all-time pound per pound great boxer?

Does he makes your list of the top 100 greatest boxers ever?

Explain and why?
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Yes for ATG, not sure about the top 100. Right on the cusp.
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Tomasino »

elmersalsa wrote:Is Oscar De La Hoya an all-time pound per pound great boxer?

Does he makes your list of the top 100 greatest boxers ever?

Explain and why?

Definite ATG, in fact, I'd pick him over Roberto Duran at lightweight. Duran couldn't handle the speed.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Rexob »

:o :lol:
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by man »

elmersalsa wrote:Is Oscar De La Hoya an all-time pound per pound great boxer?

Does he makes your list of the top 100 greatest boxers ever?

Explain and why?
any day of the week. he didn't shy away of
leaving his comfort zone and some of his
losses are due to this rare attitude.

he could box, had a punch and a great heart.
easily a top 100 p4p.

having said that his stupidity against tito was
unforgivable.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

I don't know what to do with ODLH. What are his amazing victories? Whitaker was unravelling. Chavez old and scar-riddled. Ike Quartey? Vargas?

Not sure how well his stamina fares in a 15-rounder either. And there's a lot of cosmetics on his record. Belting various B-class guys to manufacture a 'multi-weight world champion' status. Great heart in the ring though, and I did enjoy his career. I don't know.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Rexob »

So De lay hoya was shite but Cooney was the best thing since sliced bread? :lol:
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

I didn't say either of those things, you remedial.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Rexob »

Tuan_Jim wrote:I didn't say either of those things, you remedial.


Ok miscreant.
elmersalsa
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 15706
Joined: 02 Feb 2003, 03:50

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by elmersalsa »

Tomasino wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:Is Oscar De La Hoya an all-time pound per pound great boxer?

Does he makes your list of the top 100 greatest boxers ever?

Explain and why?

Definite ATG, in fact, I'd pick him over Roberto Duran at lightweight. Duran couldn't handle the speed.
At least he had much more speed than the Hands of Stone.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

I wouldn't say that. Maybe a slight edge in handspeed, Duran's prime foot speed was off the charts.
Ezzard
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11173
Joined: 12 May 2005, 09:20

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Ezzard »

I voted no. He was a great fighter. Deserved close decisions over Tito and Mosely.

I just remember his early career. Boiled down to the bone so he could decimate smaller opponents. Meant he could have all these belts. And this strategy became the blueprint for all the top prospects that came after him.
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by man »

Ezzard wrote:Boiled down to the bone so he could decimate smaller opponents. Meant he could have all these belts.
oscar de la hoya invented making weight?
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Sklar »

Yes. Didn't swerve anyone and for a while in the late nineties was arguably the best clean fighter on the planet.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46550
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by gilgamesh »

He was a great fighter, usually came up just short against his best opponents, but still has some really great wins, and a great career. You get the sense at Welterweight he could've competed with most anybody, but I also figure quite a few of the greats would've gotten the best of him more often than he'd get the best of them.
DaveyMac
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 806
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 01:49

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by DaveyMac »

Top 100? I think you could make the argument he's top 25.
Hell yes he's top 100.
IKSRTFO
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4759
Joined: 09 Dec 2007, 17:14

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by IKSRTFO »

Ezzard wrote:I voted no. He was a great fighter. Deserved close decisions over Tito and Mosely.

I just remember his early career. Boiled down to the bone so he could decimate smaller opponents. Meant he could have all these belts. And this strategy became the blueprint for all the top prospects that came after him.

He was in the Olympics at 132 so I fail to se how spending the early portion of his career between 130 and 135 is boiling down. Was he supposed to gain 10lbs overnight?
man
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3197
Joined: 09 Jul 2007, 10:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by man »

DaveyMac wrote:Top 100? I think you could make the argument he's top 25.
Hell yes he's top 100.
for me he is around 40.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

DaveyMac wrote:Top 100? I think you could make the argument he's top 25.
Hell yes he's top 100.
He isn't top 25 since 1970.
Jaywheel
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2697
Joined: 19 Mar 2008, 12:14

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Jaywheel »

DaveyMac wrote:Top 100? I think you could make the argument he's top 25.
Hell yes he's top 100.
:lol:
Tomasino
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7876
Joined: 24 Apr 2010, 16:39

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Tomasino »

elmersalsa wrote:
Tomasino wrote:
elmersalsa wrote:Is Oscar De La Hoya an all-time pound per pound great boxer?

Does he makes your list of the top 100 greatest boxers ever?

Explain and why?

Definite ATG, in fact, I'd pick him over Roberto Duran at lightweight. Duran couldn't handle the speed.
At least he had much more speed than the Hands of Stone.

A very measured response Elmer. I'd pick Duran over ODLH any day :TU:
davie
Cruiserweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by davie »

Probably somewhere between 75-100

But when you start talking about guys around the 100 mark are we still really discussing an ATG?
At which point does it stop being ATG?

I mean I rank Larry war machine Olubamiwo at 12,342 all time. Technically puts him on my ATG list, just really really low down it.
tiny_acres
Middleweight
Posts: 9463
Joined: 17 Feb 2014, 14:43

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by tiny_acres »

davie wrote:Probably somewhere between 75-100

But when you start talking about guys around the 100 mark are we still really discussing an ATG?
At which point does it stop being ATG?

I mean I rank Larry war machine Olubamiwo at 12,342 all time. Technically puts him on my ATG list, just really really low down it.
I mean when we are talking of the thousands and thousands of pro boxers in the last century alone.
I think atg should be classified as top 100

That's still an unbelievable accomplishment.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9011
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Syntax Error »

davie wrote:Probably somewhere between 75-100

But when you start talking about guys around the 100 mark are we still really discussing an ATG?
At which point does it stop being ATG?

I mean I rank Larry war machine Olubamiwo at 12,342 all time. Technically puts him on my ATG list, just really really low down it.
:lol: :lol:

I love this post. :bow:
Ambling Alp II
Super Middleweight
Posts: 15181
Joined: 04 Nov 2012, 18:31

Re: Oscar De La Hoya: An All-Time Pound Per Pound Great?

Post by Ambling Alp II »

I post a top 100 list a couple of years ago. He is certainly in the top 100. Rating him around#75 is fair. This is more about people not liking him than anything else.
Post Reply