Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by johnswan1 »

The never ending story, this is taking far too long to get organised. Fury sure does seem to spend a long time between fights.

http://ringtv.craveonline.com/news/4168 ... moter-says
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by stevedoc »

the good news is it's set to happen over here at a football ground ,old trafford or wembley i'd guess . it seems that fury is losing some momentum here it's not impossible that if AJ beats martin for the ibf belt that fury could find himself playing second fiddle to AJ in the popularity
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Syntax Error »

Nothing is ever simple with Tyson Fury.

Thanks mostly to David Haye, he didn't get his title shot for 2 years & now he's finally the champ, he can't he organise a timely rematch with the guy he won the title from.

I'm beginning to feel a bit sorry for him.
leejonesjnr
Middleweight
Posts: 2667
Joined: 31 Dec 2013, 18:32

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by leejonesjnr »

stevedoc wrote:the good news is it's set to happen over here at a football ground ,old trafford or wembley i'd guess . it seems that fury is losing some momentum here it's not impossible that if AJ beats martin for the ibf belt that fury could find himself playing second fiddle to AJ in the popularity
He's already massively behind Joshua in the popularity stakes I'd say
big lennox
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2550
Joined: 06 Feb 2004, 13:44

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by big lennox »

I get the impression that this is the Klitschko's messing Fury about, not allowing him to get any momentum and frustrate him. Surely, there must come a point where he just moves on. He has got all the belts and the win. Klitschko needs him more than the other way round.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7277
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Oiky »

big lennox wrote:I get the impression that this is the Klitschko's messing Fury about, not allowing him to get any momentum and frustrate him. Surely, there must come a point where he just moves on. He has got all the belts and the win. Klitschko needs him more than the other way round.
i agree :TU:
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by afcmarshall »

Have a feeling this fight will never happen
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Rexob »

Fury is already 24stone so hope its not much longer else he might be pipping 30! Maybe thats the big klits plan?
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by johnswan1 »

Definitely something very odd going on here. There have been references to Fury's chronic back pain. Seems like neither guy fancies it that much. I wonder if there is something in the contract to say that the rematch must happen within a certain timeframe, and whether Fury can get out of that with a sicknote. If that sort of thing happens and gets drawn out too long it's probably likely Wlad would retire rather than face somebody else.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Sklar »

Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he fornicate. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by tigermoth87 »

Is it in the contract that Fury can't defend his belt against anyone else before he does the rematch?

That's a ridiculously huge lay-off, really he should try to squeeze in a stay busy defence vs some bum like Glazkov if possible. Just to give him the motivation to keep in shape and such.
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16935
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).
Yeah think that was a wind up he looked ok to me in the vid.
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by johnswan1 »

BTW - does anybody think this fight would sell out a 50,000+ seater stadium in the UK?

I doubt it. In fact, even though Fury is now champ, I think the fight was probably bigger first time round than it is now. Previously it carried hype and everybody wanted to see what Fury could do. Now we've seen it - the fight was dull, and most would expect a similar type of fight and similar outcome. If he wins again it's no big deal, just a repeat of what happened before. Doesn't really sound like the sort of fight that would create a huge level of demand. Maybe if Matchroom were involved, but not sure Hennessy can pull off selling out an event to that size of crowd.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Rexob »

Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).

How do you know? have you been talking to him in Tescos or something?
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Offal »

leejonesjnr wrote:He's already massively behind Joshua in the popularity stakes I'd say
Yes.
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Offal »

Sklar wrote:
Rexob wrote:Fury is already 24stone...
:lol: Is he eff. He was joking. Tyson has been ticking over doing running and weights. He's not balooned to anything like 24 stone (this time/yet).
There's some reason he was wearing that baggy grey monstrosity on Saturday, he may not be 24st but I bet he's over the 20st mark.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Remember when Channel 5 put Fury in front of a table stacked with crisps and sweets and he talked us through his diet? :lol:
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by freddydoesdallas »

johnswan1 wrote:BTW - does anybody think this fight would sell out a 50,000+ seater stadium in the UK?

I doubt it. In fact, even though Fury is now champ, I think the fight was probably bigger first time round than it is now. Previously it carried hype and everybody wanted to see what Fury could do. Now we've seen it - the fight was dull, and most would expect a similar type of fight and similar outcome. If he wins again it's no big deal, just a repeat of what happened before. Doesn't really sound like the sort of fight that would create a huge level of demand. Maybe if Matchroom were involved, but not sure Hennessy can pull off selling out an event to that size of crowd.
No, i don't think it would now.

First time round, i would have paid to go and watch Wlad if it was in this country. Immediately afterwards (well if the fight was about to happen now) i think it would have as the build up would never have stopped. Now, however, i think the general public have forgotten about him and are about to have a more high profile heavyweight champ
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6851
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Noxy »

This is really getting boring.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Stuarty »

Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.
According to the new item, the fight was partially delayed by an Injury Fury sustained.

They are probably also struggling to find venues in the summer.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Stuarty »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Noxy wrote:This is really getting boring.
It really is. Typical Klitschko bollux! The sooner he fucks off the better.
According to the new item, the fight was partially delayed by an Injury Fury sustained.

They are probably also struggling to find venues in the summer.
I thought because there was a rematch clause in place things would've went smooth(ish). If it's an injury to either it obviously can't be helped but Wlad is notoriously difficult to deal with. Wouldn't surprise me if the hold up was down to petty demands/squabbling.
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by Offal »

Fury should have given back all the (four I think?) belts after the Wlad fight, and just done his own thing, until someone beats him in the ring (for better or worse) he is Heavyweight Champion of the World.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by handsofstone »

Seems Fury could've maybe fitted in the Glazkov defence kept the IBF and made more money in the long run
johnswan1
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3348
Joined: 27 Feb 2005, 18:03

Re: Fury-Klitschko rematch may get pushed back to the fall, promoter says

Post by johnswan1 »

Offal wrote:Fury should have given back all the (four I think?) belts after the Wlad fight, and just done his own thing, until someone beats him in the ring (for better or worse) he is Heavyweight Champion of the World.
He could have thrown the IBF/WBO/WBA belts in the bin publicly and kept the Ring belt, which does not require sanctioning fees or mandatory defenses. Would have been a good protest against the alphabet bodies who have become so greedy that even one champion per division is not enough. Having beaten Klitschko he still would have been considered the real champ regardless of whether he kept the belts or not.
Post Reply