Macklin V Rose

craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Macklin V Rose

Post by craigjenkins05 »

Does anyone know what weight they're fighting at? With Macklin moving down to light middle and Rose moving up seems a strange time to make the fight
Last edited by craigjenkins05 on 02 Apr 2016, 05:54, edited 1 time in total.
Offal
Welterweight
Posts: 274
Joined: 17 Mar 2016, 18:28

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Offal »

Macklin looked dreadful against Welborne, if he must carry on with his career he'd be (marginally) better off returning to Middle.
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Starboxer »

I pick Rose

Good fights on sat night
afc
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 57
Joined: 14 Mar 2009, 10:34

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by afc »

craigjenkins05 wrote:Does anyone know what weight they're fighting at? With Macklin moving down to light middle and Rose moving up seems a strange time to make the fight
I heard it's being boxed at middle
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Wales »

Fight is at middle. I pick Rose, thats down to how bad Macklin has gone as appose to how good Rose is.

Dont rate Rose tbh. Done really well for himself, genuine example of hard work beats talent when talent doesnt work hard
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1791
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by tigermoth87 »

Rose

He isn't great, but Macklin is finished.
craigjenkins05
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 477
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 11:03

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by craigjenkins05 »

I don't rate rose if Macklin is half his former best he should win this I hope
baron_otto
Middleweight
Posts: 233
Joined: 01 Sep 2013, 13:26

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by baron_otto »

craigjenkins05 wrote:I don't rate rose if Macklin is half his former best he should win this I hope
Sadly I don't think Macklin is half his former best. I'd like him to win but I can't see past Rose.
Oiky
Super Welterweight
Posts: 7227
Joined: 16 Feb 2015, 09:22

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Oiky »

macklins best days are behind him, rose wins this for me :box:
pyenest77
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1491
Joined: 29 Sep 2009, 15:14

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by pyenest77 »

Agree rose wins in a stinker.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Wales »

Is it harsh to say Macklin cuts a sad figure who looks to be fighting on through necessity.
mickey1975
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22940
Joined: 02 Mar 2009, 12:54

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by mickey1975 »

Wales wrote:Is it harsh to say Macklin cuts a sad figure who looks to be fighting on through necessity.
Really shouldn't be with his gym and its backers.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Stuarty »

Rose will outlast Macklin if he manages to make it past the third. Fancy Macklin to come out firing then fade badly.
PredatorHayds
Welterweight
Posts: 4886
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by PredatorHayds »

I fancy Rose on points.

Good crossroads fight.

Can't see either fighting for a world title again though.
Marlo Stanfield
Middleweight
Posts: 447
Joined: 17 Dec 2013, 14:38

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Marlo Stanfield »

pyenest77 wrote:Agree rose wins in a stinker.
I think Rose in a good scrap. His rematch with Carson Jones was great fun
gmanji
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 248
Joined: 21 Sep 2008, 03:05

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by gmanji »

Wales wrote:Fight is at middle. I pick Rose, thats down to how bad Macklin has gone as appose to how good Rose is.

Dont rate Rose tbh. Done really well for himself, genuine example of hard work beats talent when talent doesnt work hard
Are you for real? Brian has been boxing since 11, record of 95 fights 10 losses, countless England vests. Lonsdale Belt outright winner.

One of the most naturally talented boxers Ive ever seen.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Rexob »

gmanji wrote:
Wales wrote:Fight is at middle. I pick Rose, thats down to how bad Macklin has gone as appose to how good Rose is.

Dont rate Rose tbh. Done really well for himself, genuine example of hard work beats talent when talent doesnt work hard
Are you for real? Brian has been boxing since 11, record of 95 fights 10 losses, countless England vests. Lonsdale Belt outright winner.

One of the most naturally talented boxers Ive ever seen.

:-?
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Stuarty »

gmanji wrote:
Wales wrote:Fight is at middle. I pick Rose, thats down to how bad Macklin has gone as appose to how good Rose is.

Dont rate Rose tbh. Done really well for himself, genuine example of hard work beats talent when talent doesnt work hard
Are you for real? Brian has been boxing since 11, record of 95 fights 10 losses, countless England vests. Lonsdale Belt outright winner.

One of the most naturally talented boxers Ive ever seen.
Rose is a solid domestic fighter. Probably slots somewhere inbetween domestic/European and world level. Never been his biggest fan but I think he'll have too much for Macklin.
CMDY
Super Welterweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 03 Apr 2015, 12:26

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by CMDY »

Fancy Rose, he's at the level, where as Macklin is regressing and also I can't think the MGM stuff is a mental help.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by expe »

gmanji wrote:
Wales wrote:Fight is at middle. I pick Rose, thats down to how bad Macklin has gone as appose to how good Rose is.

Dont rate Rose tbh. Done really well for himself, genuine example of hard work beats talent when talent doesnt work hard
Are you for real? Brian has been boxing since 11, record of 95 fights 10 losses, countless England vests. Lonsdale Belt outright winner.

One of the most naturally talented boxers Ive ever seen.
You can't have seen many fighters then.
Furey
Middleweight
Posts: 105
Joined: 14 Jan 2014, 15:56

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Furey »

Would like to see Macklin roll back the years, hasn't looked on the ball for a good while now... make or break.
Floyd the snake
Super Welterweight
Posts: 359
Joined: 04 Oct 2014, 13:52

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Floyd the snake »

Wonder if his manager/backers have turned up this week ? bet Eddies' been caking it all week, looked a few more security guards than normal at the press conference.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Counter-puncher »

Floyd the snake wrote:Wonder if his manager/backers have turned up this week ? bet Eddies' been caking it all week, looked a few more security guards than normal at the press conference.
what, Hard Man Eddie? no chance.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Stuarty »

Furey wrote:Would like to see Macklin roll back the years, hasn't looked on the ball for a good while now... make or break.
I think he'll go for it early then run out of steam. He'd have obviously watched the first Jones fight and fancies he can do a similar job. I'm sure Rose will be expecting an early onslaught though.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Macklin V Rose

Post by Stuarty »

Counter-puncher wrote:
Floyd the snake wrote:Wonder if his manager/backers have turned up this week ? bet Eddies' been caking it all week, looked a few more security guards than normal at the press conference.
what, Hard Man Eddie? no chance.
:lol: :lol: Salt of the earth Eddie. FAAACKING bring it on you CAAAANTS!
Post Reply