I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

bnovelist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 23 Nov 2009, 02:37

I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by bnovelist »

All the bad luck started once he quickly dropped that 25-30lbs to face the #1 contender at LHW Tarver. His 1st fight was Tarver never giving his

body time to get re-adjusted back at the weight. We never saw him lose not even a single round in 10yrs everything went downhill once he lost all

that weight so in a sense he is still undefeated for me in my opinion :OhYes:
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Wales »

bnovelist wrote:We never saw him lose not even a single round in 10yrs :
Montell Griffin 1?
Kurgen22
Welterweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 20:18

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Kurgen22 »

Roy Jones Lost one fight in about 15 years as a pro. A DQ while he was ahead on all scorecards. He smoked the guy in one round next time.
He never really lost a fight until his 51st tiff. I think he was 35 or 36 at he time.
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by SFW »

Roy was down on 2 of the 3 cards I believe but had just gotten the knockdown and had Griffin figured out. RJJ was tentative, took awhile to adjust but he did. That late blow cost him... Roy was definitely an ATG.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Wales »

Kurgen22 wrote:Roy Jones Lost one fight in about 15 years as a pro. A DQ while he was ahead on all scorecards. He smoked the guy in one round next time.
He never really lost a fight until his 51st tiff. I think he was 35 or 36 at he time.
I was just picking the low fruit on a ridiculous statement that we never saw him lose not even a single round in 10 years.

He lost rounds against numerous fighters, Hopkins springs to mind.

Regardless, he is an ATG, but i do think he'd be rated higher by many had he retired after Ruiz.

Annoys me, even as a welshman, when people credit Calzaghe with beating him - Jones was shot to pieces by then. And equally discredit Calzaghe for not fighting him at SMW. Jones left SMW division around 95 and Calzaghe didnt win a title until '97!
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1791
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by tigermoth87 »

I personally think as soon as a boxer is caught cheating using PEDs their past fights should all be changed to no contests as there is a strong likelihood that they doped to win them too.

Roid Jones failed a drug test after fighting Richard Hall so that fight and the ones prior should become No-Contests.

So Roid's new record is 21 - 8 - 41
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7853
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Wales »

Same for Klitchko, Vargas, Toney, Holyfield, Maccarinelli, Mosley, Mayorga to name but a few.
Kurgen22
Welterweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 20:18

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Kurgen22 »

Wales wrote:[

I was just picking the low fruit on a ridiculous statement that we never saw him lose not even a single round in 10 years.

He lost rounds against numerous fighters, Hopkins springs to mind.

Yes, understood. Roy was probabably the most athletic fighterI ever witnessed. In a way I think that became his undoing. His technique wasn't really that solid as far as fundamentals relied on that athletic abilty to keep his hands low and avoid punches. Once he slowed down he got caught with shots that wouldnt have come near him in his prime.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Chepppaaa »

the dq was crap griffin was losing the fight, jones won. the second fight just shows how much better jones was than griffin.

jones beat hopkins & toney easily, this shows you how great prime jones was, that he had not many problems against future atg.

jones was 50-0 when he truly lost his first fight via ko against tarver.
Chepppaaa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 2626
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 19:32

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Chepppaaa »

Kurgen22 wrote:
Wales wrote:[

I was just picking the low fruit on a ridiculous statement that we never saw him lose not even a single round in 10 years.

He lost rounds against numerous fighters, Hopkins springs to mind.

Yes, understood. Roy was probabably the most athletic fighterI ever witnessed. In a way I think that became his undoing. His technique wasn't really that solid as far as fundamentals relied on that athletic abilty to keep his hands low and avoid punches. Once he slowed down he got caught with shots that wouldnt have come near him in his prime.

what exactly are fundamentals or technic? holding, clinching, truning the head 180, wresting like great technician do..floyd, ward :lol:

the name of the game is hit and not get hit, prime roy was getting punched less than floyd or pernell, his technic is underrated. his reflexes were on another level.
Kurgen22
Welterweight
Posts: 72
Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 20:18

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Kurgen22 »

Chepppaaa wrote:
what exactly are fundamentals or technic? holding, clinching, truning the head 180, wresting like great technician do..floyd, ward :lol:

the name of the game is hit and not get hit, prime roy was getting punched less than floyd or pernell, his technic is underrated. his reflexes were on another level.
Roy was unorthodox in that he fought with his hands low and constantly leaned in and exposed himself. He was NOT a true technician who held his hands up and elbows in, chin down, etc. Like you said, his reflexes were on another level. Once they were gone he was left with bad fundamentals. Thats why he will get hammered by any rated fighter he faces now.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1791
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by tigermoth87 »

Wales wrote:Same for Klitchko, Vargas, Toney, Holyfield, Maccarinelli, Mosley, Mayorga to name but a few.
Yep, imo any should have all past fights reversed.

They need to crack down on drug cheats. Just look at Terper, been caught twice I believe yet somehow both fights the result still stands? Ridiculous.

Wipe their past record clean, destroy their legacy and then maybe some will think twice before using PEDs.
koolkc107
Middleweight
Posts: 2032
Joined: 31 Oct 2013, 10:54

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by koolkc107 »

I think he is the best most of us have ever seen and the argument can be made that a prime Roy is the GOAT.

But, no way he isn't tarnishing his legacy by continuing to fight.

And no way he can be considered still unbeaten.
squiggy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2093
Joined: 04 Feb 2008, 03:35

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by squiggy »

Calzaghe well and truly proved that RJJ was done at top level, and that was a decade of pointless fights ago.
palooka
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 15698
Joined: 20 Jan 2012, 15:31

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by palooka »

The issue with Roy Jones is that he would have been better retiring long ago. He was a marvellous fighter and the beat of his era, it's a real shame he still has the urge or need to fight. If he had retired after the Ruiz bout he'd have left an amazy legacy. Moving up and down in weight has done him no favours but he's pretty much shot now and nowhere near the boxer he once was.
magwitch
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by magwitch »

Kurgen22 wrote:Roy Jones Lost one fight in about 15 years as a pro. A DQ while he was ahead on all scorecards. He smoked the guy in one round next time.
He never really lost a fight until his 51st tiff. I think he was 35 or 36 at he time.
Someone...can’t remember who but think it may have been on here, said Roy was the perfect fighting machine (prime). I wouldn’t disagree with that and I think prime Roy Jones would beat any equivalent UFC champion.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by gilgamesh »

squiggy wrote:Calzaghe well and truly proved that RJJ was done at top level, and that was a decade of pointless fights ago.
Glen Johnson and Tarver 3 proved that. Roy Jones didn't even try to win at any point in either of those fights...2004 and 2005 respectively.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

Kurgen22 wrote:Roy was unorthodox in that he fought with his hands low and constantly leaned in and exposed himself. He was NOT a true technician who held his hands up and elbows in, chin down, etc. Like you said, his reflexes were on another level. Once they were gone he was left with bad fundamentals. Thats why he will get hammered by any rated fighter he faces now.
Gone after 15 years ... isn't that enough of a prime to erase the end of his career?
Cygnus475
Welterweight
Posts: 271
Joined: 27 Feb 2016, 16:33

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Cygnus475 »

I agree in terms of h2h I can't think of any boxer that would completely whoop his ass in his prime. Maybe robinson or Hagler but they'd have their hands full. No one would be able to "easily" beat him.
bnovelist
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 987
Joined: 23 Nov 2009, 02:37

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by bnovelist »

You get my point though? Nobody ever came CLOSE to ever beating him UNTIL he dropped 25-30lbs in a 2month period. That's where everything went

downhill my FAV RJJ clips :bag: :box: :bag: :box: :bag: :box: :brick: :lol: :TU: :clap: :bag: :box: :brick: :OhYes: :yay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_L4PeAjwk5E
jezzamundo
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3127
Joined: 16 Jun 2004, 13:11

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by jezzamundo »

Here's a question - how much weight did RJJ really lose before the Tarver fight? He weighed in at 193lb for the Ruiz fight, 18lb over the light heavyweight limit. What weight was Roy in the ring for his LHW defenses? 175lb? 180lb? 190lb?

Are people suggesting Roy was much heavier than 193lb in the ring against Ruiz - that he cut weight, potentially harming his performance just to be lighter on the scales for a fight with no weight limit?

I don't think it's like Roy lost more than 15lb for the Tarver fight, maybe nearer 10lb. That's still not a good idea at the age he did it, but people claiming a 25-30lb drop are either gullible or clueless.
Dixonian
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by Dixonian »

tigermoth87 wrote:
Wales wrote:Same for Klitchko, Vargas, Toney, Holyfield, Maccarinelli, Mosley, Mayorga to name but a few.
Yep, imo any should have all past fights reversed.

They need to crack down on drug cheats. Just look at Terper, been caught twice I believe yet somehow both fights the result still stands? Ridiculous.

Wipe their past record clean, destroy their legacy and then maybe some will think twice before using PEDs.
Well said. People conveniently ignore RJJ's drug cheating, but for me it's his overriding legacy. He's a drug cheat, pure and simple. Forget about him as an all time great. He's disqualified.
chinarich
Middleweight
Posts: 6858
Joined: 29 Dec 2013, 13:20

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by chinarich »

bnovelist wrote:All the bad luck started once he quickly dropped that 25-30lbs to face the #1 contender at LHW Tarver. His 1st fight was Tarver never giving his

body time to get re-adjusted back at the weight. We never saw him lose not even a single round in 10yrs everything went downhill once he lost all

that weight so in a sense he is still undefeated for me in my opinion :OhYes:
You're kidding, right? I know the purpose of fora is to provoke debate but sheesh...
uptconnect
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 268
Joined: 18 Mar 2002, 20:00

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by uptconnect »

All of my favorite fighters ever are undefeated, too.
Whenever they lost, I just didn't count those fights, or else labeled them a win for my guy through some dumb ambiguous logic, even if he got knocked the f*ck out.
That's what's great about boxing. We can all make our own rules and record books.
:TU:
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: I Still View As Roy As Being Unbeaten

Post by watsupdoc87 »

tigermoth87 wrote:
Wales wrote:Same for Klitchko, Vargas, Toney, Holyfield, Maccarinelli, Mosley, Mayorga to name but a few.
Yep, imo any should have all past fights reversed.

They need to crack down on drug cheats. Just look at Terper, been caught twice I believe yet somehow both fights the result still stands? Ridiculous.

Wipe their past record clean, destroy their legacy and then maybe some will think twice before using PEDs.
was klitchco ever found to be taken peds? :bag:
Post Reply