CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9025
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by Syntax Error »

stujones wrote:Forget Whyte - I want to see Martin vs De Mori (and I am actually being a tad serious).

The travesty of the situation is that Martin's reign is already longer than Tony Tucker's and Bonecrusher Smith - two fighters who would have absolutely destroyed him.
De Mori? :oo :oo

Why would anyone outside of the De Mori family & Team Hayemaker want to see this guy fight anybody?

Charles Martin's heavy bag would provide sterner opposition than Mark De Mori would.
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

sweetscience wrote:
Rexob wrote:
sweetscience wrote:ive lumped £100 on 1&2 KO for Joshua

which means it wont happen as I haven't won a boxing bet since Khan/Salita :OhYes:
I'm tempted by that bet.
my actual bet is:-

£50 @ 8/1 1st rounds
£50 @ 4/1 1st or 2nd

so win either £700 ish or £250

or ZERO
I might do the same, but just bet 20 on round one, 20 on round 2, not sure what the advantage is of the above?
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by Tuan_Jim »

stujones wrote:Forget Whyte - I want to see Martin vs De Mori (and I am actually being a tad serious).

The travesty of the situation is that Martin's reign is already longer than Tony Tucker's and Bonecrusher Smith - two fighters who would have absolutely destroyed him.
Martin looks like the type of gangly incompetent Tommy Morrison used to behead on the USA Network in the 1990s. I wouldn't pick Martin over any heavyweight champion in history.
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by sweetscience »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
sweetscience wrote:
Rexob wrote:
I'm tempted by that bet.
my actual bet is:-

£50 @ 8/1 1st rounds
£50 @ 4/1 1st or 2nd

so win either £700 ish or £250

or ZERO
I might do the same, but just bet 20 on round one, 20 on round 2, not sure what the advantage is of the above?
The 2nd one is more of a back up.... If josh wins in 2nd I get my money back and a bit of a tickle... Wins in first I win twice
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by stujones »

Syntax Error wrote:
stujones wrote:Forget Whyte - I want to see Martin vs De Mori (and I am actually being a tad serious).

The travesty of the situation is that Martin's reign is already longer than Tony Tucker's and Bonecrusher Smith - two fighters who would have absolutely destroyed him.
De Mori? :oo :oo

Why would anyone outside of the De Mori family & Team Hayemaker want to see this guy fight anybody?

Charles Martin's heavy bag would provide sterner opposition than Mark De Mori would.
I've seen a similar highlight reel of De Mori - yes, he is poor no doubt, but I actually think he does the basics better than Martin. Sure he is not as powerful or as big and would probably get smashed - but I did not realise just how poor Martin is technically. De Mori seems to have better footwork and shot selection and at least tucks the chin in and in general throws more punches.

I honestly reckon Chisora and Whyte beat him quite easily based on that highlight reel and yes, it might even be interesting vs De Mori.

I haven't seen enough of Martin yet to pass judgement properly yet - perhaps his corner are correct when they say "well he looks crap but he is actually excellent".... Frans Botha and Corrie Sanders looked awful beating up low level opposition when they were up and coming and those two didn't turn out half bad (not great, but definitely showed their worth as decent gate keepers).... but my gosh that is awful, he does so many novicy errors.
stujones
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 27513
Joined: 29 Aug 2003, 15:08

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by stujones »

I really wonder what will the NEXT step for Joshua be. Hearn said to Shannon Briggs that the world title has come to early for Joshua but this is a golden opportunity - seeing more of Martin, you can see why.

Is he going to press on, or will he fight underserving fighters when making defences. Will we see Joshua vs Whyte 2 for the IBF title?
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by Rexob »

stujones wrote:I really wonder what will the NEXT step for Joshua be. Hearn said to Shannon Briggs that the world title has come to early for Joshua but this is a golden opportunity - seeing more of Martin, you can see why.

Is he going to press on, or will he fight underserving fighters when making defences. Will we see Joshua vs Whyte 2 for the IBF title?


I hope not it was a pretty conclusive ending no need for any rematch.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by Counter-puncher »

stujones wrote: Will we see Joshua vs Whyte 2 for the IBF title?

Oh, Eddie, you are a cute one.
rhino222
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6618
Joined: 09 Sep 2005, 09:38

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by rhino222 »

everytime he throws his backhand his right hand drops very low. AJ could bingo him early with the left hook!!
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

sweetscience wrote:
jamesmcdonnell wrote:
sweetscience wrote:
my actual bet is:-

£50 @ 8/1 1st rounds
£50 @ 4/1 1st or 2nd

so win either £700 ish or £250

or ZERO
I might do the same, but just bet 20 on round one, 20 on round 2, not sure what the advantage is of the above?
The 2nd one is more of a back up.... If josh wins in 2nd I get my money back and a bit of a tickle... Wins in first I win twice
Yeah but you'd get the same if you put 50 quid on 2nd round ko surely at 8-1?
sweetscience
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2816
Joined: 22 Sep 2004, 09:09

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by sweetscience »

I'd only get £450 if he wins in first if I did it that way... Get £700 this way
stevedoc
Super Middleweight
Posts: 3550
Joined: 24 May 2013, 07:40

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by stevedoc »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:Oh deary me; he carries his head like it's on a pikestaff, Joshua will be like a kid at a coconut shy just lining up to knock his block off.

The only asset I see there is he has quick hands ; but almost all his power shots seem to be hooks, Joshua's long straight shots will get there first.

I think I need to lump 20 quid on a 1st round KO.

I see a very quick end to this.

i thought the same head sticking up and hands low not a good combo
JC
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4579
Joined: 07 Jan 2004, 13:04

Re: CHARLES MARTIN: LEAST IMPRESSIVE HIGHLIGHTS EVER?

Post by JC »

Might have a quid on Martin by DQ at 100/1, just in case AJ hits him so obviously on the floor the ref has no choice.
Post Reply