Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) Winner and How?

Poll ended at 26 Dec 2015, 15:01

Anthony Joshua Stoppage
145
68%
Anthony Joshua Decision
3
1%
Draw
4
2%
Charles Martin Decision
5
2%
Charles Martin Stoppage
55
26%
 
Total votes: 212

Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

Martin is ready to go
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

Anone think Joshua looked spooked
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45213
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Starboxer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Image

Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina

Better how? What are you basing the stamina on, given Joshua's not even been 12 rounds yet.

I'd say that Joshua's output of punches is quite impressive for a man of his size.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Rexob »

Starboxer wrote:Martin is ready to go Home with his tail between his legs
:TU:
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Rexob »

Starboxer wrote:Anone think Joshua looked spooked

No.
Tuan_Jim
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Tuan_Jim »

Starboxer wrote:Anone think Joshua looked spooked
Your shilling is of a poor standard. You obviously don't believe what you're writing.
Stuarty
Super Welterweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

Starboxer wrote:Anone think Joshua looked spooked
No. Did you?
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Sklar »

Starboxer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Image

Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina
And what..? Think Bruno was clean?
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Counter-puncher »

Wait- you mean it isn't just a genetic disposition towards high muscle density? :o
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by reggaereggae »

Sklar wrote:Please God check out the weigh in video. When Joshua walks on stage and greets the people Tupac's ghost momentarily overcomes the body of Adam Smith. Very funny to my simple mind. Very funny.
Don't stress blud.... Adam Smith just be keeping it real.... Man dem is more dangerous than you tink... Man crush haters and fakers with a left hook innit
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by expe »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Starboxer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Image

Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina

Better how? What are you basing the stamina on, given Joshua's not even been 12 rounds yet.

I'd say that Joshua's output of punches is quite impressive for a man of his size.
He was knackered after 3/4 rounds against Whyte, doesn't really bode well for him as he's taken deeper into fights.
the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by the_doctor »

Sklar wrote:
Starboxer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:
Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina
And what..? Think Bruno was clean?
Of course not. No professional athlete surrounded by the best physical trainers and dieticians who trains full time can have big biceps and a six-pack without pumping himself full off drugs :TU:
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Starboxer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Image

Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina

Better how? What are you basing the stamina on, given Joshua's not even been 12 rounds yet.

I'd say that Joshua's output of punches is quite impressive for a man of his size.


He can't keep that Pace up. I agree though he was throwing close to 100 punches a round in the whyte fight , power shots as well
HellraiserBoxing
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 138
Joined: 18 Aug 2011, 17:18

Joshua v Martin Predictions please!

Post by HellraiserBoxing »

So Joshua v Martin tomorrow :clap:

What are your predictions and why? Here's mine :box:

http://youtu.be/NLK5x6DNYsI [url]
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

the_doctor wrote:
Sklar wrote:
Starboxer wrote:



Bruno had a better physique than Joshua and better stamina
And what..? Think Bruno was clean?
Of course not. No professional athlete surrounded by the best physical trainers and dieticians who trains full time can have big biceps and a six-pack without pumping himself full off drugs :TU:
Bruno did
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Counter-puncher »

Oh god
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

I will be so happy if Martin wins especially if it's the eighth or ninth round

Show me the money
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Sklar »

Counter-puncher wrote:Oh god
It's unfortunate that people don't get a better handle on this issue. The common misconception is thst if people pass drug tests they must be clean. That's complete nonsense. The allowable ratios for testosterone are ridiculously high, which practically gives a green light for steroid usage up to that level. Tests for HGH are crap, so are rarely done and are ineffectual.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Counter-puncher »

Indeed
Starboxer
Welterweight
Posts: 221
Joined: 28 Mar 2016, 06:53

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Starboxer »

If I had money on Joshua i would be worried after that weigh in

I read on YouTube that one guy put 10k on Joshua for a 2k return ,madness
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by lefty »

Sklar wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Oh god
It's unfortunate that people don't get a better handle on this issue. The common misconception is thst if people pass drug tests they must be clean. That's complete nonsense. The allowable ratios for testosterone are ridiculously high, which practically gives a green light for steroid usage up to that level. Tests for HGH are crap, so are rarely done and are ineffectual.
The CIR test is probably the best test available currently (although still not perfect) but it's expensive so doesnt get used as often as it should be.
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by Sklar »

Starboxer wrote:I read on YouTube that one guy put 10k on Joshua for a 2k return ,madness
Must be true if you read it there.
the_doctor
Welterweight
Posts: 398
Joined: 01 Feb 2015, 09:08

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by the_doctor »

Sklar wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Oh god
It's unfortunate that people don't get a better handle on this issue. The common misconception is thst if people pass drug tests they must be clean. That's complete nonsense. The allowable ratios for testosterone are ridiculously high, which practically gives a green light for steroid usage up to that level. Tests for HGH are crap, so are rarely done and are ineffectual.
I think it's unfortunate that every athlete is viewed with such staggering suspicion.

Maybe they are using. Maybe they're not. But the suggestion by some (with clearly very limited medical or physiological knowledge) that it is simply impossible to achieve these sorts of results without resorting to dodgy methods is utter garbage.

An example closer to home - my brother plays rugby (amateur level only). He goes to the gym for an hour or two, probably three times a week. He plays once and trains once. He has a terrific physique. And I guarantee you 100% he takes nothing. He even ditched the protein shakes.

As I say, a passed test doesn't guarantee a clean athlete. But the way some of you guys go on in here, it's like anyone with some definition is clearly on something :lol:
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by watsupdoc87 »

BitPlayer wrote:
Tuan_Jim wrote:Image

Look at Martin sucking his gut in.

As for Joshua's physique. . . . Libel laws leave me wordless.
That's actually how some people's stomachs look.

his stomach is like that(turtle belly) because hes quite obviously taking either growth, insulin or more likely both :bag:
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Anthony Joshua vs. Charles Martin (c) - April 9th 2016

Post by watsupdoc87 »

Sklar wrote:
Counter-puncher wrote:Oh god
It's unfortunate that people don't get a better handle on this issue. The common misconception is thst if people pass drug tests they must be clean. That's complete nonsense. The allowable ratios for testosterone are ridiculously high, which practically gives a green light for steroid usage up to that level. Tests for HGH are crap, so are rarely done and are ineffectual.
hgh is near imposible to test for as its a natural hormone the body produces and cant be detected the same way say testosterone is detected by checking your test levels :bag:
Post Reply