Quoting you from a previous topic: "An objective and differing opinion is not appreciated here, they want everyone to be the same. If you do then you are an outcast."Undefeated49-0 wrote:Why would anyone want to see this garbage fight again, two boring and non-skilled HWs hurling blows with no intent to really win or hurt the other then only to come together in a slow dance waltz that puts everyone to sleep.
Klitschko is the modern day John HuggaBoxer Ruiz.
Yes, if you claim to be objective as you call Klitschko "non-skilled" then you should be outcast. 64 wins, including 22 in a row, does not come from a person lacking skill. Generally boring in a heavyweight era lacking a depth of talent, yes. Non-skilled while shutting out Haye, Povetkin, Chambers and Chagaev collectively in the midst of 22 straight wins, fail.
I haven't watched a Klitschko fight live since he fought Haye because I need the ability to fast-forward. However, if you can't watch him and see 3-4 skills that he does better than anyone in the division then you are either a dishonest troll or a casual boxing fan.
And judging from your name, you likely have a life-sized Mayweather poster in your bedroom. I would use the exact same argument against the trolls who call Mayweather boring and overrated, no matter how much I dislike the clown.
I am also sure Wladamir had "no intent to win". Who would want to be heavyweight champion for at least another 6-12 months? Might as well take a break. More objectivity in your opinion. Very impressive sentence.