Fury v Klitschko allegedly PPV?

[thatllbeme]

with allegedly getting this will this be their 1st PPV event on Sky Boxoffice Red Button?

[Sklar]

Probably. That's been the word on the street for several weeks.

[Andrew]

Yes gotta be.

[jameswilson]

Just had the email through that it is on allegedly. No mention of PPV tho.

[Sklar]

Just had the email through that it is on allegedly. No mention of PPV tho.

Even better. If the fight happens and is on regular bn there can be no complaints. I'm going to the fight though, if it happens.

[jameswilson]

Just had the email through that it is on allegedly. No mention of PPV tho.

Even better. If the fight happens and is on regular bn there can be no complaints. I'm going to the fight though, if it happens.

Well the Warren's during their famous interview said that it wouldn't cost us allegedly subscribers anything. Essentially just a better advertised and easier means of non allegedly subsribers of buying 1 fight or 1 months subscription.

[fizzjambo]

Just had the email through that it is on allegedly. No mention of PPV tho.

Even better. If the fight happens and is on regular bn there can be no complaints. I'm going to the fight though, if it happens.

Well the Warren's during their famous interview said that it wouldn't cost us allegedly subscribers anything. Essentially just a better advertised and easier means of non allegedly subsribers of buying 1 fight or 1 months subscription.

That's what I've heard - just part of the package for regular viewers and a PPV fee for non-subcribers.

I've heard nothing to confirm this but I think there is a very good chance that this will be a joint headliner with Saunders v Golovkin at the Etihad. In all fairness that would be a massive show and make a lot of sense with Golovkin being a K2 fighter

[jameswilson]

Even better. If the fight happens and is on regular bn there can be no complaints. I'm going to the fight though, if it happens.

Well the Warren's during their famous interview said that it wouldn't cost us allegedly subscribers anything. Essentially just a better advertised and easier means of non allegedly subsribers of buying 1 fight or 1 months subscription.

That's what I've heard - just part of the package for regular viewers and a PPV fee for non-subcribers.

I've heard nothing to confirm this but I think there is a very good chance that this will be a joint headliner with Saunders v Golovkin at the Etihad. In all fairness that would be a massive show and make a lot of sense with Golovkin being a K2 fighter

I'll tell you what, if that happens I will personally post a picture of my bare arse.

[mullenman]

This fight will not, will not happen on this date


Joshua fighting on sky ppv

[PokerRob]

This fight will not, will not happen on this date


Joshua fighting on sky ppv

You mean Joshua will not, will not be fighting on this date!!! He is small fry compared to the big boys!!!

[BigDoofus]

I've heard nothing to confirm this but I think there is a very good chance that this will be a joint headliner with Saunders v Golovkin at the Etihad.

Saunders chose to fight the world's no.50 Max Bursak instead of GGG. Do you really believe that he wants to fight him?

[fizzjambo]

I've heard nothing to confirm this but I think there is a very good chance that this will be a joint headliner with Saunders v Golovkin at the Etihad.

Saunders chose to fight the world's no.50 Max Bursak instead of GGG. Do you really believe that he wants to fight him?

I think he'd he like serious money and is very confident in his ability. If he'd get the same money for Golovkin as say Eubank or Jacobs I think he'd fight the later two everyday. To me the big issue with this fight is just how well would GGG sell over here?

Fans think about legacys - fighters think about pay cheques. Cannae blame either side for that but if GGG means the most money I'd fully expect Saunders to take it

Bursak is a low pay, low risk fight. I don't see Saunders developing a big following so for good money he needs to face good fighters.

Warren and Saunders would love Eubank as it is probably the same money, possibly better, than GGG at a fraction of the risk.

[BitPlayer]

I think with Saunders he wants it but just wanted some time first, let GGG get a bit older, get his fitness up a bit.

[Boxerbeetle]

I think with Saunders he wants it but just wanted some time first, let GGG get a bit older, get his fitness up a bit.

Yeah, Saunders wants GGG just as much as Quigg & Frampton want Rigo.

[samwbr]

Golovkin shouldn't be second on any bill.

[fizzjambo]

Golovkin shouldn't be second on any bill.

Neither should Roman Gonzalez but it doesnae work like that

[wesshaw1985]

Fury vs. Klitschko 2
BJS vs. GGG/Eubank jr
Flanagan vs. TBA
& local undercard fighters.

Fury brings the travellers and Mancs so add BJS to increase the travellers present and Flanagan to increase the Mancs present.
W@rren could go all in on this PPV card...

[Tarkus]

Warren cried to a regulator and forced Sky to have allegedly shown on Sky box office. They cant have two ppv in close proximity though. So now if both Joshua and Fury fight are in early July how are they going to decide which is going on Sky box office?

[wesshaw1985]

Warren cried to a regulator and forced Sky to have allegedly shown on Sky box office. They cant have two ppv in close proximity though. So now if both Joshua and Fury fight are in early July how are they going to decide which is going on Sky box office?

W@rren has to buy his way onto Sky PPV according to what I heard, so they could have the 2 PPVs on the same night.
Sky Box Office and Sky Sports Box Office are run separately as I understand it...

[expe]

It's part of the subscription, they confirmed it on twitter yesterday.

https://twitter.com/allegedly/status/ ... 4038546432

[BitPlayer]

Fury vs. Klitschko 2
BJS vs. GGG/Eubank jr
Flanagan vs. TBA
& local undercard fighters.

Fury brings the travellers and Mancs so add BJS to increase the travellers present and Flanagan to increase the Mancs present.
W@rren could go all in on this PPV card...

Whyte said he should be healthy by then, could get a nice little heavyweight fight with someone people know. Obviously it would be an easy fight, still be cool to see though, and he's always entertaining to watch. Chisora could also fight a club fighter to keep busy and build hype for his fight with Whyte, though since he split with Warren that could be awkward. The fights them selves won't be great anyway, but I think it'd be a slick move.

Hughie could also fight, it'd be good to get him exposure.

Daniel Jacobs could also fight Saunders, since they've had a back and forth.

[gilgamesh]

Barely worth watching twice for free

[BitPlayer]

Golovkin shouldn't be second on any bill.

It could be a co-main event, it'd make sense as I bet quite a few would watch it for GGG-BJS rather than Wlad Fury if that did happen.

[Tarkus]

Warren cried to a regulator and forced Sky to have allegedly shown on Sky box office. They cant have two ppv in close proximity though. So now if both Joshua and Fury fight are in early July how are they going to decide which is going on Sky box office?

W@rren has to buy his way onto Sky PPV according to what I heard, so they could have the 2 PPVs on the same night.
Sky Box Office and Sky Sports Box Office are run separately as I understand it...

They are run separately and Warren ppv on Sky Box office will be a allegedly show. However in term of how many PPVs they can have on SBO same commercial principles apply. Thats how I understand it anyway. So SBO will have to decide if show is PPV worthy and which one to choose if there are more then one.

[jameswilson]

Fury vs. Klitschko 2
BJS vs. GGG/Eubank jr
Flanagan vs. TBA
& local undercard fighters.

Fury brings the travellers and Mancs so add BJS to increase the travellers present and Flanagan to increase the Mancs present.
W@rren could go all in on this PPV card...

Here's another one that I'd post a picture of my bare arse for.

What's your next suggestion Wes? Saunders v Eubank, Smith v Cotto, Flanagan v Crolla and Elvis Presley vs JFK, maybe Princess Diana vs Camilla Parker Bowles in a mud wrestling contest just to get the casuals and toffs demographic interested?