Joshua v Martin RBR

For RBR threads only
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by crusader »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
This.
Reckless? You're giving Martin far too much credit.
How? He was a legit top ten boxer, yet still a relatively unknown quantity.
Top ten based on what? The nothing fight against a guy who squeaked by Rossy?

There was footage of him available and I don't see any good basis for thinking it was reckless to put someone as promising as AJ against him.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by gilgamesh »

Rexob wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Horse wrote:Joshua is a big stiff idiot and Fury would play with him.
Steve Cunningham had enough pop to put Fury on his back. Joshua will keep him there.

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Syntax Error
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 9007
Joined: 22 Apr 2005, 08:00

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Syntax Error »

Neil Gee wrote:
crusader wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
This.
Reckless? You're giving Martin far too much credit.
How can you say that? Martin was the ibf heavyweight champion of the world!
My neighbour's cat could be IBF heavyweight champion of the world!

It's totally meaningless; it's the quality of the fighter what is important.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4904
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by rd350lc »

digzee wrote:
Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Joshua will walk through Fury.
Joshua isn't in the same league.

Martin is a no mark.
Besides Wlad who on Fury's record do you think could beat AJ?
that's a great point , maybe the John Mcdermott that gave Fury his worst night to date would school Joshua .
stocky balboa
Super Middleweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 13:24

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by stocky balboa »

milpool wrote:AJ's now up there with other British sporting greats like Martin 'Wolfie' Adams. We should all be proud to be Great Britain tonight!
post of the night pal!
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by lefty »

I'd back Joshua against Fury I have to say. I've felt that for awhile though. My reasoning being that whilst Fury is definietly better in some areas ie Speed of foot and maybe hand speed, I feel that Fury lacks the power to really keep Joshua at bay and AJ would be willing to take more risks than Klitschko was to land his power shots. Just my personal take on it though.
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

Rexob wrote:


Martin is good at growing hair that's it.
Haha :OhYes:
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by digzee »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Horse wrote:
digzee wrote:Besides Wlad who on Fury's record do you think could beat AJ?
Chisora and Cunningham.

Martin is nothing.
:lol:

Chisora and Cunningham would beat AJ? Ridiculous comment.
Haha crazy talk.
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4904
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by rd350lc »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rexob wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Steve Cunningham had enough pop to put Fury on his back. Joshua will keep him there.

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
This ^
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13112
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rexob wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Steve Cunningham had enough pop to put Fury on his back. Joshua will keep him there.

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Troubling how many people don't understand it.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23006
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by handsofstone »

Just another day at the office for Joshua really,even Cornish landed a punch,2 identical knockdowns,both textbook,Martin delibritely mistimed the count which we've seen loads of times,he actually didnt look badly hurt but he wanted no more

Not much else to add really except congratulations :salut:
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Andrew »

People actually paid for that rubbish on top of an already expensive sky subscription

What a farce of a card.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Horse »

cmdenny wrote:Happy for AJ. Real shame the IBF was stripped off Fury as makes it a bit empty. I was bouncing round room when Fury won it. This was a little of an anti climax compared to Fury's win, but still great to see.

Worth pointing out that a few fights ago people were saying AJ was only fighting can's (yeah I know Martin was no World Beater) but now he's just won a share of the WChampionship (albeit in unsatisfactory circumstances with IBF).

I have Heavies as:
1) Fury
2) AJ
3) Povetkin (could take out AJ, but the reach difference is significant).
4) Wilder
5) WK (retire at top after Fury fight either way)
NB - am not sure how to rate Ortiz as 37 now and fringe of being in WC mix.

Eddie Hearn's speech just now made me want to be sick in my mouth.
No way Joshua deserves to be above Klitschko, Wilder or Povetkin.

Joshua can just about sneak into the top 10, but that is about it.

Martin is not a proven fighter. Beating him does not show that Joshua is world class.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by reggaereggae »

:lol: :lol: :lol: according to Ed Robinson, Joshua is the most impressive and quickest heavyweight champ ever.... Forget the fact that he won his title against a novice who won a title off a guy that twisted his knee, and that he won the world's weakest paper title ever which got stripped without good reason from Tyson Fury...
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32676
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Boxerbeetle »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rexob wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Steve Cunningham had enough pop to put Fury on his back. Joshua will keep him there.

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Rexob is clearly on a wind-up tonight, so I don't know what he really believes :lol:
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16764
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Fury on his game beats AJ. If he sticks his chin out he'll get knocked out. The fight could go either way.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Horse »

Boxerbeetle wrote: :lol:

Chisora and Cunningham would beat AJ? Ridiculous comment.
I didn't say that.

Pathetic post from you.
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Rexob »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Rexob wrote:

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Troubling how many people don't understand it.


people know shite about boxing if they think Fury is gonna roll over.
expe
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6871
Joined: 07 Oct 2012, 10:10

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by expe »

gilgamesh wrote:
Rexob wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
Steve Cunningham had enough pop to put Fury on his back. Joshua will keep him there.

Joshua won't get the chance not skillfull enough!
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
He went to Germany and outboxed Klitschko in his own backyard, if he "ain't shit", then either there isn't a heavyweight on the planet that's close to decent and hasn't been for 10 years, or you know fornicate all about boxing.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 46246
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by gilgamesh »

Rexob wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Troubling how many people don't understand it.


people know shite about boxing if they think Fury is gonna roll over.
I don't think he's gonna roll over. I think he's gonna get knocked over because he sucks.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 16764
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Rexob wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:
gilgamesh wrote:
You guys severely overrate Fury. He ain't sh*t and his reign ain't gonna last.
Troubling how many people don't understand it.


people know shite about boxing if they think Fury is gonna roll over.
:clap: :TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22331
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Horse »

lefty wrote:I'd back Joshua against Fury I have to say. I've felt that for awhile though. My reasoning being that whilst Fury is definietly better in some areas ie Speed of foot and maybe hand speed, I feel that Fury lacks the power to really keep Joshua at bay and AJ would be willing to take more risks than Klitschko was to land his power shots. Just my personal take on it though.
Fury could knock Joshua out.

Fury not being able to punch is a nonsense.
Benelio
Cruiserweight
Posts: 601
Joined: 02 May 2011, 05:57

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Benelio »

I can see Fury winning a wide decision, then the casuals whinging that Fury just ran all night.
Neil Gee
Middleweight
Posts: 4257
Joined: 06 Jul 2013, 15:37

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Neil Gee »

A thousand pounds is nothing to Tyson Fury. He's just done that to create hype.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32676
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Joshua v Martin RBR

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Horse wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote: :lol:

Chisora and Cunningham would beat AJ? Ridiculous comment.
I didn't say that.

Pathetic post from you.
Did I misinterpret your post? What did you mean then?
Post Reply