The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post Reply
chad
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1806
Joined: 22 Sep 2011, 13:52

The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by chad »

SKY get bashed week in week out but Smith, Nelson and McCrory are handling this pretty well. Fairly impartial, zerp cheerleading and easy on the ear IMO
Andrew
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by Andrew »

Standard isn't high with Halling but agreed as much stick as Smith gets on here I've always thought he was a good commentator.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by Horse »

Sky made sure the judges were terrible instead.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by keirw »

Apart from Mcrorys 'swooooping hooooks' of course
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

Turgid repetitive horse pish.
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by TheCobra »

I prefer Smith to Halling.

Halling is dreadful and I'm very tired of Watt.
reggaereggae
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4723
Joined: 21 Dec 2009, 17:01

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by reggaereggae »

I've always liked McCrory. I even like Jim Watt's voice, it's just the words are not so great. I kind of zone out over the commentary anyway, if you know your boxing you don't really need the commentary but turning the sound off takes the atmosphere away.

Don't they say that commentary is really for the casual fan / laymen not the hardcore.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by ElJefe »

The annoying thing about Halling's commentary is that he is probably knowledgeable enough to do a decent job if he just stuck to calling the action in a play-by-play, punch-by-punch sort of way. The problem comes when he starts trying to tell the story of the fight. You're not Jim Ross, it's not WWE. It works there because the outcome is pre-determined, but it doesn't work with boxing. Not when the fight can be constantly changing and nobody knows what will happen next. There doesn't need to be a narrative. Just call what you see. :doh:
Dixonian
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1051
Joined: 08 Aug 2011, 06:37

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by Dixonian »

ElJefe wrote:The annoying thing about Halling's commentary is that he is probably knowledgeable enough to do a decent job if he just stuck to calling the action in a play-by-play, punch-by-punch sort of way. The problem comes when he starts trying to tell the story of the fight. You're not Jim Ross, it's not WWE. It works there because the outcome is pre-determined, but it doesn't work with boxing. Not when the fight can be constantly changing and nobody knows what will happen next. There doesn't need to be a narrative. Just call what you see. :doh:
Across all sports commentators get way too obsessive about narratives. It's like watching a film with somebody constantly trying to tell you what's going on. We're watching, we can see...
ScottDetonator
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1079
Joined: 15 Mar 2011, 04:33

Re: The SKY commentary tonight ain't bad

Post by ScottDetonator »

Should be a commentary mute button for all sports.

Halling can spoil and does spoil a fair few fights for me. Especially hate the talking over the corner work and over the ring walk.
Post Reply