Brook vs Spence

Switch hitter
Super Welterweight
Posts: 590
Joined: 09 Aug 2014, 07:43

Brook vs Spence

Post by Switch hitter »

If the fight happened next who do you think would win ???
SFW
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1246
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 11:04

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by SFW »

Spence would win clearly
Baby Face Finster
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 17416
Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Baby Face Finster »

This would be a good gauge to see how good Spence is. I doubt he will go after Brook the way he has done with his previous opponents.
Deadendgeneration
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1906
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Deadendgeneration »

Can't see past Spence. Though I admittedly don't rate Brook as highly as some.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by digzee »

Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Horse »

digzee wrote:Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Cotto ducked Brook?
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by digzee »

Horse wrote:
digzee wrote:Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Cotto ducked Brook?
Yep, Cotto wanted to fight in June but HBO rejected the 3 fighters he wanted to fight as they were not PPV worthy, HBO called Hearn and asked if Brook will take the fight and when HBO contacted Cotto they didn't get a reply then Hearn contacted ROC and again no reply. So now Cotto isn't going to fight in June he's going to wait and see whose available at the end of the year. http://www.BS.com/miguel-cotto ... ll--103504
Listen to Hearn from 4:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5mCzrn0Egc
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

Spence beats all of them.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by ikorolev »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Spence beats all of them.
So, what do you think caused such significant improvement ? He wasn't so impressive in amateurs.
SaadOffTheDeck
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 19602
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 07:38

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by SaadOffTheDeck »

ikorolev wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Spence beats all of them.
So, what do you think caused such significant improvement ? He wasn't so impressive in amateurs.
I don't watch amateur boxing. Can't say, I've been impressed every step of his pro career. He definitely has a pro style. Breaking down guys to the body won't win decisions in the amateurs.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Badhusker »

SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:Spence beats all of them.
So, what do you think caused such significant improvement ? He wasn't so impressive in amateurs.
I don't watch amateur boxing. Can't say, I've been impressed every step of his pro career. He definitely has a pro style. Breaking down guys to the body won't win decisions in the amateurs.
His talent had always been recognized in the amateurs too, with an outstanding record that includes 2 wins over Amir Iman, and beating Sammy Vasquez. Who recently took out Aron Martinez.
$$Money$$
Welterweight
Posts: 31
Joined: 15 Apr 2016, 10:45

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by $$Money$$ »

Spence is the best and beats any WW that is active in the sport right now.

He easily dominated Algieri, Pac struggled with CA and though he knocked him down several times he was unable to finish him.

Spence made that fight look easy.

Khan was running from CA and couldn't get him out of there, this only shows how good Spence really is.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by crusader »

Pac didn't struggle with Algieri at all.
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Impractical Poster »

crusader wrote:Pac didn't struggle with Algieri at all.
This is true. However, Spence made it look easier.
Impractical Poster
Middleweight
Posts: 7636
Joined: 18 Jun 2014, 07:28

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Impractical Poster »

Brook/Spence would be a sensational match-up. I'm leaning towards Spence. But I have to admit that bias has a lot to do with it. I am not ruling out Brook for a second. He is a top talent.
Noxy
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6824
Joined: 02 Jun 2013, 10:57

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Noxy »

Who knows who would win, just make the match. COME ON EDDIE!!
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Lancenix »

Horse wrote:
digzee wrote:Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Cotto ducked Brook?
Why would that surprise you? Cotto is overrated by the media because he is an HBO money maker who never comes up big in the big fight. He ran to the top of the hills in Puerto Rico when GGG and Brook challenged him.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by Lancenix »

crusader wrote:Pac didn't struggle with Algieri at all.
Spence would crush that little Filipino smurf. HBO will never let the fight happen. They have to protect all of their overrated stars.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by ikorolev »

Badhusker wrote:
SaadOffTheDeck wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
So, what do you think caused such significant improvement ? He wasn't so impressive in amateurs.
I don't watch amateur boxing. Can't say, I've been impressed every step of his pro career. He definitely has a pro style. Breaking down guys to the body won't win decisions in the amateurs.
His talent had always been recognized in the amateurs too, with an outstanding record that includes 2 wins over Amir Iman, and beating Sammy Vasquez. Who recently took out Aron Martinez.
I meant international arena, not beating other Americans. He lost an Olympic quarter-final to a Russian who lost in a semi-final. I also watched his 2011 fight with Kazakh Sapiyev (future Olympic champ) who literally beat Spence hands down.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by crusader »

Spence was the arguably the best amateur P4P in the US for a while and was only a win away from medals at the Olympics and World Championships. That's pretty solid (Porter, Thurman, and Garcia didn't even make the Olympic team) and there are many top pros who didn't have better amateur careers than Spence.

He also seems to have a style that is better suited to the pros.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by ikorolev »

crusader wrote:Spence was the arguably the best amateur P4P in the US for a while and was only a win away from medals at the Olympics and World Championships. That's pretty solid (Porter, Thurman, and Garcia didn't even make the Olympic team) and there are many top pros who didn't have better amateur careers than Spence.

He also seems to have a style that is better suited to the pros.
I agree with your last statement.

Speaking about being "the best amateur P4P in the US", it doesn't say much, because the level for US amateur boxing is not so high lately.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by lefty »

crusader wrote:Spence was the arguably the best amateur P4P in the US for a while and was only a win away from medals at the Olympics and World Championships. That's pretty solid (Porter, Thurman, and Garcia didn't even make the Olympic team) and there are many top pros who didn't have better amateur careers than Spence.

He also seems to have a style that is better suited to the pros.
To be fair though and I could be wrong so do correct me if so- didn't Thurman lose out to Demetrius Andrade in regards to his place? Theres no real shame in that if so.
lefty
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 19821
Joined: 04 Feb 2012, 11:33

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by lefty »

digzee wrote:Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Why would Cotto wanna fight Brook? What would he gain from it? He's not getting back down to 147 to challenge for the belt so it seems a pretty pointless fight for him in regards to risk to reward.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by ikorolev »

lefty wrote:
digzee wrote:Cotto ducked Brook for a reason and people on this forum will see why if this fight happens next.
Why would Cotto wanna fight Brook? What would he gain from it? He's not getting back down to 147 to challenge for the belt so it seems a pretty pointless fight for him in regards to risk to reward.
Brook would fight Cotto at any weight. He is even barking at Golovkin.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Brook vs Spence

Post by crusader »

lefty wrote:
crusader wrote:Spence was the arguably the best amateur P4P in the US for a while and was only a win away from medals at the Olympics and World Championships. That's pretty solid (Porter, Thurman, and Garcia didn't even make the Olympic team) and there are many top pros who didn't have better amateur careers than Spence.

He also seems to have a style that is better suited to the pros.
To be fair though and I could be wrong so do correct me if so- didn't Thurman lose out to Demetrius Andrade in regards to his place? Theres no real shame in that if so.
Thurman lost twice to Andrade in the Olympic trials, but even so he never really did anything to suggest that he was a standout amateur on the international stage.
Post Reply