who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post Reply
dickbelden
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 767
Joined: 07 Aug 2004, 20:45

who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by dickbelden »

*
dberry
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3350
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 02:15

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by dberry »

Sturm will be getting a minimum of two years, I should imagine, using a form of testosterone.
Browne may be able to defend himself successfully on the premise that he tested negative in a pre-fight test, clenbuteral is not a performance enhancing drug for a twelve round heavyweight fight, in fact, it's performance inhibiting and off the back of the Fres Oquendo debacle it is most likely was set up.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Lancenix »

Sturm. Tyson Fury has come out and said that he thinks Browne was poisoned. Many others have said the same. I wonder if this could be true??
Ilya Muromets
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4243
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 15:02

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Ilya Muromets »

Lancenix wrote:Sturm. Tyson Fury has come out and said that he thinks Browne was poisoned. Many others have said the same. I wonder if this could be true??

Did Fury say that? I am inclined to believe that Browne is innocent as well.
hurricanemitch14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 828
Joined: 13 Apr 2004, 02:35

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by hurricanemitch14 »

I truly believe Browne , sturm not so much.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Lancenix »

x2x wrote:
Lancenix wrote:Sturm. Tyson Fury has come out and said that he thinks Browne was poisoned. Many others have said the same. I wonder if this could be true??

Did Fury say that? I am inclined to believe that Browne is innocent as well.
Yes he did. The video is up on youtube. Check it out and see what you think. He goes on in great detail about his thoughts on his positive test and being poisoned in general.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Badhusker »

Browne went as far to pass a lie detector test too, so I am inclined to believe he is innocent.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by ikorolev »

Badhusker wrote:Browne went as far to pass a lie detector test too, so I am inclined to believe he is innocent.
He may be innocent, but if people are not punished based on some allegations with no proof, where will it lead the sport ? Corrupt officials will be able to decide who to punish and who not to punish ?
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Badhusker »

ikorolev wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Browne went as far to pass a lie detector test too, so I am inclined to believe he is innocent.
He may be innocent, but if people are not punished based on some allegations with no proof, where will it lead the sport ? Corrupt officials will be able to decide who to punish and who not to punish ?
There may be a punishment, but they should give careful consideration to the fact that he was the one that wanted the random testing, and was tested by both blood and urine a week from the fight. He was "caught" by a urine only test after the fight with a drug that makes absolutely no sense as an advantage on his behalf. Just sounds awful fishy. He is the first one that wanted to take a lie detector test that I know of to prove his innocence.

The punishments are already all over the board it seems depending on who catches you, what you are caught with, and what sanctioning body you are fighting under. This was an illegal drug, but not a performance enhancing drug.
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Lancenix »

Badhusker wrote:
ikorolev wrote:
Badhusker wrote:Browne went as far to pass a lie detector test too, so I am inclined to believe he is innocent.
He may be innocent, but if people are not punished based on some allegations with no proof, where will it lead the sport ? Corrupt officials will be able to decide who to punish and who not to punish ?
There may be a punishment, but they should give careful consideration to the fact that he was the one that wanted the random testing, and was tested by both blood and urine a week from the fight. He was "caught" by a urine only test after the fight with a drug that makes absolutely no sense as an advantage on his behalf. Just sounds awful fishy. He is the first one that wanted to take a lie detector test that I know of to prove his innocence.

The punishments are already all over the board it seems depending on who catches you, what you are caught with, and what sanctioning body you are fighting under. This was an illegal drug, but not a performance enhancing drug.
This is why Fury claims that Browne's water was poisoned with a drug that had nothing to do with him winning. Fury said that in the fight against Klitschko all water offered by any German entity was turned away and they brought all of their own water and kept it in bottles, closely safeguarded by his own trainer and staff.
KingJune
Welterweight
Posts: 26
Joined: 04 Feb 2016, 19:44

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by KingJune »

A heavyweight taking a diuretic? Going to be ridiculous if he gets banned, obviously there is something strange going on there. If Browne gets banned boxing will be doing this :brick:

Fuck Felix Sturm.
Lackeos
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3598
Joined: 26 Jan 2008, 03:05

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Lackeos »

KingJune wrote:A heavyweight taking a diuretic?
Yes, they do that sometimes when they're trying to fool a drug test. Do you not understand how that works?
ClivePatrickLyons
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

hurricanemitch14 wrote:I truly believe Browne , sturm not so much.

:TU:
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1795
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by tigermoth87 »

Sturm needs his career ending.

Browne I think is innocent so I don't think he will get a ban. I believe the guy anyway.
bigman1968
Super Welterweight
Posts: 672
Joined: 24 Jul 2014, 03:45

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by bigman1968 »

Nothing legit happened in Chechnia in last 25 years :stop:
Lancenix
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1656
Joined: 14 Apr 2013, 01:27

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Lancenix »

Lackeos wrote:
KingJune wrote:A heavyweight taking a diuretic?
Yes, they do that sometimes when they're trying to fool a drug test. Do you not understand how that works?
That is true. Diuretics are often a positive in the olympics as well.
Badhusker
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4902
Joined: 19 Jun 2010, 23:57

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by Badhusker »

Correct me if I am wrong, but Clenbuterol is not a diuretic. There are 3 types of diuretics, and it is not listed under any of them.
ikorolev
Middleweight
Posts: 4895
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 19:08

Re: who will get a longer ban browne or sturm ? *

Post by ikorolev »

Clenbuterol is a sympathomimetic amine used by sufferers of breathing disorders as a decongestant and bronchodilator. People with chronic breathing disorders such as asthma use this as a bronchodilator to make breathing easier.

Weight-loss drug
Although often used by bodybuilders during their "cutting" cycles, the drug has been more recently known to the mainstream, particularly through publicized stories of use by celebrities such as Victoria Beckham, Britney Spears, and Lindsay Lohan, for its off-label use as a weight-loss drug similar to usage of other sympathomimetic amines such as ephedrine, despite the lack of sufficient clinical testing either supporting or negating such use.
Post Reply