BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 18 Apr 2016, 12:15

...on Fury/Wlad card according to the BN24 forum.

Would be a great addition to the card if true.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 18 Apr 2016, 12:22

That would be a right result if so, be great for the card, and great exposure for both fighters.

I reckon the rematch will be a much better affair than the 1st, I think Eubank will probably struggle early a little, but he looks to me like he's learnt his lesson about starting faster now. If Saunders slows down significantly, as he did last time around, he's going to be in trouble, and could wind up losing the decision. I don't think he's going to be able to just box at a leisurely pace against Jr this time.

Boxerbeetle · Post by **Boxerbeetle** » 18 Apr 2016, 12:26

That would be superb, believe it when it happens though

CiganoBoxer · Post by **CiganoBoxer** » 18 Apr 2016, 13:01

If BJS was fitter the first time around he would of won every round ...i think you will see the same thing again ,BJS outboxes him in my opinion once again

expe · Post by **expe** » 18 Apr 2016, 13:09

Can't really take ESB seriously as a source, especially when the poster is claiming it will be part of BN's first PPV when it's already been confirmed that it will be part of the subscription and by Hearn that Sky won't be picking Fury-Klitschko 2 up as a PPV, whether through Sky Sports or not.

I do think it will happen and Warren alluded to it being announced this week, but it won't be on the Fury-Klitschko card.

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 18 Apr 2016, 13:57

expe wrote:Can't really take ESB seriously as a source, especially when the poster is claiming it will be part of BN's first PPV when it's already been confirmed that it will be part of the subscription and by Hearn that Sky won't be picking Fury-Klitschko 2 up as a PPV, whether through Sky Sports or not.

I do think it will happen and Warren alluded to it being announced this week, but it won't be on the Fury-Klitschko card.

Could still be 'allegedly's first PPV' in fairness, as it could be available via Sky PPV but 'free' to subscribers as they were alluding to in the interview with George. As for Hearn....he has nothing to do with non-Sports PPV, as previously mentioned by Bunny.

jamiem26 · Post by **jamiem26** » 19 Apr 2016, 09:32

Frank said he had Wembley held for if BJS/Eubank could be made for the Fury/Klitscho card. I can't see any way that it ends up on there now.

MarkMcBurney wrote:
expe wrote:Can't really take ESB seriously as a source, especially when the poster is claiming it will be part of BN's first PPV when it's already been confirmed that it will be part of the subscription and by Hearn that Sky won't be picking Fury-Klitschko 2 up as a PPV, whether through Sky Sports or not.

I do think it will happen and Warren alluded to it being announced this week, but it won't be on the Fury-Klitschko card.
Could still be 'allegedly's first PPV' in fairness, as it could be available via Sky PPV but 'free' to subscribers as they were alluding to in the interview with George. As for Hearn....he has nothing to do with non-Sports PPV, as previously mentioned by Bunny.

Correct.

How are people getting confused by this? Any allegedly PPV would obviously not be at any extra cost to subscribers ffs, it would be commercial suicide.

MarkMcBurney · Post by **MarkMcBurney** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:23

jamiem26 wrote:Frank said he had Wembley held for if BJS/Eubank could be made for the Fury/Klitscho card. I can't see any way that it ends up on there now.

MarkMcBurney wrote:
expe wrote:Can't really take ESB seriously as a source, especially when the poster is claiming it will be part of BN's first PPV when it's already been confirmed that it will be part of the subscription and by Hearn that Sky won't be picking Fury-Klitschko 2 up as a PPV, whether through Sky Sports or not.

I do think it will happen and Warren alluded to it being announced this week, but it won't be on the Fury-Klitschko card.
Could still be 'allegedly's first PPV' in fairness, as it could be available via Sky PPV but 'free' to subscribers as they were alluding to in the interview with George. As for Hearn....he has nothing to do with non-Sports PPV, as previously mentioned by Bunny.
Correct.

How are people getting confused by this? Any allegedly PPV would obviously not be at any extra cost to subscribers ffs, it would be commercial suicide.

From memory Frank said something about an issue with the actual logistics, so it might be that subscribers would need to pay for it and then be refunded, but it would be no additional charge.

expe · Post by **expe** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:27

MarkMcBurney wrote:
jamiem26 wrote:Frank said he had Wembley held for if BJS/Eubank could be made for the Fury/Klitscho card. I can't see any way that it ends up on there now.

MarkMcBurney wrote: Could still be 'allegedly's first PPV' in fairness, as it could be available via Sky PPV but 'free' to subscribers as they were alluding to in the interview with George. As for Hearn....he has nothing to do with non-Sports PPV, as previously mentioned by Bunny.
Correct.

How are people getting confused by this? Any allegedly PPV would obviously not be at any extra cost to subscribers ffs, it would be commercial suicide.
From memory Frank said something about an issue with the actual logistics, so it might be that subscribers would need to pay for it and then be refunded, but it would be no additional charge.

I think there will be an additional charge, they're not going to give anyone a £15 PPV for £12, but you won't have to pay £12 then £15 on top. The way they were talking about it, it seems like subscribers will have to order the PPV on top of the subscription, then be given the following month free.

jamiem26 · Post by **jamiem26** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:30

Re. above two posts, can see that if that's the only way to wok it but fundamentally the point stands that subscribers wouldn't be paying any extra - and as long as that's the case, which it would be, as a subscriber I couldn't give a f*ck about the logistics of it.

Terry Dooley · Post by **Terry Dooley** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:34

I've heard it's a no-go for the time being.

JimJim2009 · Post by **JimJim2009** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:43

expe wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote:
jamiem26 wrote:Frank said he had Wembley held for if BJS/Eubank could be made for the Fury/Klitscho card. I can't see any way that it ends up on there now.

Correct.

How are people getting confused by this? Any allegedly PPV would obviously not be at any extra cost to subscribers ffs, it would be commercial suicide.
From memory Frank said something about an issue with the actual logistics, so it might be that subscribers would need to pay for it and then be refunded, but it would be no additional charge.
I think there will be an additional charge, they're not going to give anyone a £15 PPV for £12, but you won't have to pay £12 then £15 on top. The way they were talking about it, it seems like subscribers will have to order the PPV on top of the subscription, then be given the following month free.

Not being funny or anything but given the promoter I would rather the cash stayed in my bank than goes into his, for him to send back to me later, if it's all the same.

expe · Post by **expe** » 19 Apr 2016, 10:44

JimJim2009 wrote:
expe wrote:
MarkMcBurney wrote: From memory Frank said something about an issue with the actual logistics, so it might be that subscribers would need to pay for it and then be refunded, but it would be no additional charge.
I think there will be an additional charge, they're not going to give anyone a £15 PPV for £12, but you won't have to pay £12 then £15 on top. The way they were talking about it, it seems like subscribers will have to order the PPV on top of the subscription, then be given the following month free.
Not being funny or anything but given the promoter I would rather the cash stayed in my bank than goes into his, for him to send back to me later, if it's all the same.

Rob3_142 · Post by **Rob3_142** » 19 Apr 2016, 11:04

It sounds extremely complicated. If BN make a pigs ear of this, they run the risk of putting people off subscribing to BN in the future.

tigermoth87 · Post by **tigermoth87** » 19 Apr 2016, 11:21

If this is true, I can't see anything other than BJS win. I actually think he'll do it more comfortably this time around.

magwitch · Post by **magwitch** » 19 Apr 2016, 11:22

CiganoBoxer wrote:If BJS was fitter the first time around he would of won every round ...i think you will see the same thing again ,BJS outboxes him in my opinion once again

The Traveller does seem to be somewhat of an expert at the boxing. I would tip his knowledge over Eubank’s strength and fitness.
Eubank will benefit from his Dad’s knowledge a lot also but I give Saunders the edge, on boxing skills. Agree...if he was in mint shape he could probably make it lop-sided.

Oiky · Post by **Oiky** » 19 Apr 2016, 12:16

billy joe will out box jnr again

Stuarty · Post by **Stuarty** » 19 Apr 2016, 12:26

Would like to see this again. Eubank Jnr on points this time. I think BJS will be in slightly better shape this time and I can't see Eubank starting so slow. Both will pick up rounds then it could come down to the championship rounds and Eubanks better fitness will see him edge it.

reggaereggae · Post by **reggaereggae** » 19 Apr 2016, 13:24

If it happens, it's 50/50.... I would even lean towards Jnr points. He's improved a lot.

smiling assassin · Post by **smiling assassin** » 19 Apr 2016, 14:29

Won a nice little lump on the last fight and I will be lumping it all back on Billy's joe again if this fight goes ahead. He's just to good for Eubank plain and simple.

lillywhite14 · Post by **lillywhite14** » 19 Apr 2016, 14:35

I wouldn't be surprised to see Eubank win a rematch.

afcmarshall · Post by **afcmarshall** » 19 Apr 2016, 14:45

Would really help sell tickets dont know how well fury/wlad would do on its own after the first fight

Londonirish · Post by **Londonirish** » 19 Apr 2016, 16:46

Billy all the way

much easier then last time...

wesshaw1985 · Post by **wesshaw1985** » 19 Apr 2016, 16:52

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-VEiNXOj94

PredatorHayds · Post by **PredatorHayds** » 20 Apr 2016, 06:45

Good fight. Hope the rumours are true but won't believe Junior has signed the dotted line til a press conference is announced.

As for the fight I'd favour Jr on points. He's improved enough to outwork BJS who still switches off late.

BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2

Re: BJS v Eubank Jnr 2