Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post Reply
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

I want to see this fight.
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1795
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by tigermoth87 »

Loma wins it comfortably. He beat Russell Jr in like his 3rd fight. Now he's got more experience and more comfortable as a pro he'll beat him easily. Russell Jr won't win more than 3 rounds.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by crusader »

Russell hasn't shown me anything that Loma didn't already deal with. It's one thing to overwhelm a stiff, slow guy like Gonzalez with speed, but it's a totally different thing to do it to a boxer like Loma. Russell was also blowing out guys like Hyland prior to the Loma bout, so his big KO of BoxRec's #119 isn't a sign of improvement to me.

It boggles my mind how Russell beating people who are so much different from Loma has some thinking a rematch would go much differently. I also think the win over Gonzo is overrated, as Jhonny's form has been mediocre over the last few years barring him catching Mares cold, and I doubt that he was much better when he fought GR than he was when he lost to Oquendo, who was incidentally supposed to be Loma's debut opponent but pulled out.
Last edited by crusader on 21 Apr 2016, 02:42, edited 1 time in total.
Andrew
Super Middleweight
Posts: 6108
Joined: 17 Jul 2012, 09:31

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by Andrew »

crusader wrote:Russell hasn't shown me anything that Loma didn't already deal with. It's one thing to overwhelmn a stiff, slow guy like Gonzalez with speed, but it's a totally different thing to do it to a boxer like Loma. Russell was also blowing out guys like Hyland prior to the Loma bout, so his big KO of BoxRec's #119 isn't a sign of improvement to me.

It boggles my mind how Russell beating someone who is so much different from Loma has some people thinking a rematch would go much differently. I also think the win over Gonzo is overrated, as Jhonny's form has been mediocre over the last few years barring him catching Mares cold, and I doubt that he was much better when he fought GR than he was when he list to Oquendo, who was incidentally supposed to be Loma's debut opponent but pulled out.
:TU:
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22334
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by Horse »

Old ground.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Loma was a buzzsaw in that fight. Russell didn't have many answers for the volume and body punching. Nothing Russell can do in a rematch.
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by jockpunk »

I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
Artem
Super Middleweight
Posts: 98
Joined: 08 Apr 2013, 09:23

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by Artem »

No chances for Russell, result will be the same
jujigatame
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7469
Joined: 30 Oct 2004, 21:08

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by jujigatame »

Seems unlikely with Loma moving up to 130. Unless Russell follows him.

I hope we get Russell vs. the Cuellar/Mares winner.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by crusader »

jockpunk wrote:I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
What specifically has he improved?

I think he would've beaten a slow guy like Gonzalez even prior to the Loma fight, and he already had several blowouts of lower-tier opposition like Hyland, including some nasty KTFOs. To me it's a clear case of a fighter's attributes being well suited to one type of opponent (slow, stiff, and defensively basic Jhonny) but not to another (fast, fluid, and defensively adroit Loma).
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13113
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

crusader wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
What specifically has he improved?

I think he would've beaten a slow guy like Gonzalez even prior to the Loma fight, and he already had several blowouts of lower-tier opposition like Hyland, including some nasty KTFOs. To me it's a clear case of a fighter's attributes being well suited to one type of opponent (slow, stiff, and defensively basic Jhonny) but not to another (fast, fluid, and defensively adroit Loma).
I don't think anyone's attributes match up well to Loma tbh. Guy is a train.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

crusader wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
What specifically has he improved?
His sense of urgency in the ring.
jockpunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 524
Joined: 28 Oct 2005, 16:20

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by jockpunk »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
crusader wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
What specifically has he improved?
His sense of urgency in the ring.
That for one. I feel like he is sitting down on his punches more. When he was coming up he was ridiculously quick but had a very amateurish style, I feel as if that is changing. Hard to tell if he has improved defensively but I would like to see.

I also think the bright lights kind of got to him in that first fight with loma and I don't think that will be the case the second time around.
digzee
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1582
Joined: 11 Nov 2008, 13:49

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by digzee »

BAD INTENTIONS wrote:
crusader wrote:
jockpunk wrote:I would like to see it as well. I am not a Russell fan but I think he has improved and would do much better this time around.
What specifically has he improved?
His sense of urgency in the ring.
He threw 806 punches against Loma so I don't think being more urgent would help, if anything he would leave himself open for more counters. His accuracy was awful he landed 18 out of 425 jabs so instead of just letting his hands go he could try being more selective, I don't think there is anything he can do to beat Loma though he's just too good.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by crusader »

Ya, I'm not really seeing the urgency thing. He was moving his hands often and fighting hard against Lomachenko, but for once as a pro he came up against a highly skilled boxer who could negate his excellent handspeed and hence left him punching air all night. To me the differences between his fight with Loma and his last two fights are down to the opposition.

I'd like to see them have some more fights with other opponents before they rematch anyway.
BAD INTENTIONS
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1885
Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by BAD INTENTIONS »

crusader wrote:Ya, I'm not really seeing the urgency thing. He was moving his hands often and fighting hard against Lomachenko, but for once as a pro he came up against a highly skilled boxer who could negate his excellent handspeed and hence left him punching air all night. To me the differences between his fight with Loma and his last two fights are down to the opposition.

I'd like to see them have some more fights with other opponents before they rematch anyway.
I guess I can see your point, but I think you guys rate Lomachenko a little too high, but he is great so I guess it's harder to tell where overrating begins.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by crusader »

I don't think I rate him as highly as most do, and in my opinion he's probably a bit overrated on the whole. However, I still think he's very good and possesses the right mix of attributes to negate Russell's strengths, while a slow, stiff fighter like Gonzalez is made for Gary to shine against.

For now I'd like to see them fight different opponents. I think they're both capable of doing big things and perhaps down the line a rematch could be a major fight.
scallum2015
Super Welterweight
Posts: 158
Joined: 11 Mar 2015, 17:30

Re: Lomachenko VS Russell Jr. II

Post by scallum2015 »

Worse result for Russell Jr 2nd time imo. Lomachenko is the real deal n now has twice as many fights as last time
Post Reply