OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:You have a lot of love for Tyson Fury, Horse, surely everyone is entitled to love who they want, we live in a democratic country. Everyone is entitled to an opinion whether one agrees or not.
He's the one who seems to struggle with the idea of people not thinking Joshua is the most incredible fighter on earth.

Tyson Fury is the undisputed champion. He's proven how amazing he is. Joshua has not beaten one world class opponent.
Boxing is not boxing in the 90's no more Horse. AJ is boxing whos out there that are available to fight. Boxers will not face each other anymore just for the glory of the fight. They all want big paydays and titles, its not possible to accomdate every boxer with a huge sum of money and a title. times have changed from he days of one to three belts. There are no opponents that want to face each other for nothing. Its getting beyond the joke all this politics crap. But its here to stay.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:Boxing is not boxing in the 90's no more Horse. AJ is boxing whos out there that are available to fight. Boxers will not face each other anymore just for the glory of the fight. They all want big paydays and titles, its not possible to accomdate every boxer with a huge sum of money and a title. times have changed from he days of one to three belts. There are no opponents that want to face each other for nothing. Its getting beyond the joke all this politics crap. But its here to stay.
Joshua is not avoided at all.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:The division is shallow. It won't be soon though.
Why not?
Parker, wilder, Joshua, haye will be in the mix. Ortiz can definitely beat Joshua. That's his only threat.

Anyway my equine friend, answer me this if you will. What startling win on fury's record made you think he was going to beat wlad? Just curious .
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Boxing is not boxing in the 90's no more Horse. AJ is boxing whos out there that are available to fight. Boxers will not face each other anymore just for the glory of the fight. They all want big paydays and titles, its not possible to accomdate every boxer with a huge sum of money and a title. times have changed from he days of one to three belts. There are no opponents that want to face each other for nothing. Its getting beyond the joke all this politics crap. But its here to stay.
Joshua is not avoided at all.
But he isnt avoiding anyone though is he?
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Stuarty »

mimmy123 wrote:
Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Boxing is not boxing in the 90's no more Horse. AJ is boxing whos out there that are available to fight. Boxers will not face each other anymore just for the glory of the fight. They all want big paydays and titles, its not possible to accomdate every boxer with a huge sum of money and a title. times have changed from he days of one to three belts. There are no opponents that want to face each other for nothing. Its getting beyond the joke all this politics crap. But its here to stay.
Joshua is not avoided at all.
But he isnt avoiding anyone though is he?
Both true. Think he knows his limits as things stand. I doubt he'd (want to or be allowed to) jump in with Fury next but it's not far away. He's not avoided either. Martin hawked his title to AJ because of the money involved.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:But he isnt avoiding anyone though is he?
That doesn't matter, his record is still very weak by world level standards.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:But he isnt avoiding anyone though is he?
That doesn't matter, his record is still very weak by world level standards.
Do you think Joshua would struggle with any of fury's foes pre wlad?
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:But he isnt avoiding anyone though is he?
That doesn't matter, his record is still very weak by world level standards.
The world level standards are very weak though.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

Riddick Blowe wrote:Do you think Joshua would struggle with any of fury's foes pre wlad?
Yes.

Cunningham and Chisora could well have beaten him.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:The world level standards are very weak though.
Which makes Joshua's record all the more weak.
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

Horse wrote:
Riddick Blowe wrote:Do you think Joshua would struggle with any of fury's foes pre wlad?
Yes.

Cunningham and Chisora could well have beaten him.
Come on horse. You may sleep in your own faeces but you're not stupid.

Actually, I have no idea about that. Maybe you are stupid. I can't decide.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:The world level standards are very weak though.
Which makes Joshua's record all the more weak.
Not really,not in todays standards, but yes in 90's standards but that would also count for Tyson Fury too.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:Not really,not in todays standards, but yes in 90's standards but that would also count for Tyson Fury too.
No.

Joshua's record is terrible for a world champion, absolutely horrendous.

Even in this very weak heavyweight division he has still not fought a genuine top 15 ranked fighter.

He is very much unproven and I'm not sure why anyone would try to suggest otherwise.
ttornado
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by ttornado »

Horse wrote: Joshua's record is terrible for a world champion, absolutely horrendous.
But for someone with only 16 fights it's an OK record.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

ttornado wrote:But for someone with only 16 fights it's an OK record.
Yes.

If people stopped trying to suggest that Joshua is in anyway a proven world class fighter then I wouldn't have to mention just how weak his record is.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Was the 90s heavyweight scene considered strong then? Other than the obvious 2 or 3 big names, I distinctly remember it being disparaged in a similar way as we disparage the current crop.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

Boxerbeetle wrote:Was the 90s heavyweight scene considered strong then? Other than the obvious 2 or 3 big names, I distinctly remember it being disparaged in a similar way as we disparage the current crop.
I think there were a lot of tough fighters back in the 90's not saying they became world champions but many a decent fighter.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
ttornado wrote:But for someone with only 16 fights it's an OK record.
Yes.

If people stopped trying to suggest that Joshua is in anyway a proven world class fighter then I wouldn't have to mention just how weak his record is.
Who would he need to beat to become a world class boxer?
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Mimmy »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:
ttornado wrote:But for someone with only 16 fights it's an OK record.
Yes.

If people stopped trying to suggest that Joshua is in anyway a proven world class fighter then I wouldn't have to mention just how weak his record is.
Who would he need to beat to become a world class boxer?
Thats a good point, Chisora???
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

mimmy123 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:Yes.

If people stopped trying to suggest that Joshua is in anyway a proven world class fighter then I wouldn't have to mention just how weak his record is.
Who would he need to beat to become a world class boxer?
Thats a good point, Chisora???
I think Chisora is done at world level. It's slim pickings. I mean, Martin was top ten.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by Horse »

keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Chisora is done at world level. It's slim pickings. I mean, Martin was top ten.
He wasn't.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:I think Chisora is done at world level. It's slim pickings. I mean, Martin was top ten.
He wasn't.
Boxrec and The Ring say he was.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by crusader »

What did Martin accomplish to become a legitimate top ten HW?

He beat no one of note prior to Glazkov, and his title victory was due to his opponent's leg giving out after 2 slow opening rounds in which neither man built a lead across the cards. Glazkov arguably deserved to have three losses on his record going into that fight and wasn't a strong contender anyway.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17110
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by keithmoonhangover »

crusader wrote:What did Martin accomplish to become a legitimate top ten HW?

He beat no one of note prior to Glazkov, and his title victory was due to his opponent's leg giving out after 2 slow opening rounds in which neither man built a lead across the cards. Glazkov arguably deserved to have three losses on his record going into that fight and wasn't a strong contender anyway.
He beat Glazkov, who was a legit top ten fighter. Martin looked good before the stoppage. The ratings don't lie. He won. It ain't his fault the other guy got injured.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: OK I confess. I'm on the AJ train.

Post by crusader »

There was nothing in the Glazkov fight and Martin didn't even have the lead despite being the house fighter. He beat weak opposition prior to that fight and won the title not because he overwhelmed his opponent with ability, but because his opponent's leg gave out when throwing a punch. I didn't have Glazkov in my top ten anyway due to him arguably losing to Scott, Rossey, and Cunningham, and I don't for one second believe that Martin beating him in the manner he did makes CM a proven world class operator or among the best 10 heavyweights in the world. As for the various sets of rankings, the BoxRec forum HW rankings didn't feature Martin in the top 15, which I think is reasonable given his overall mediocre resume and the nature of his win over Glazkov. Even if someone had Martin in the top 10 simply because he scored a (very unconvincing) win over Glazkov it doesn't mean they think he was top 10 ability-wise, and isn't ability the main issue when debating whether someone is good enough to be considered world class?

It wouldn't surprise me if AJ could already beat people like Fury, Povetkin, and Wilder, but I get Horse's point about him being relatively unproven due to the quality of his opposition.
Post Reply