Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
At the O2 in London. For a world title. An opponent still fighting 10-rounders.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Very poor.
Does Joshua's team know something that we don't?
Does Joshua's team know something that we don't?
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
I've got a big bag of told-you-so here lads
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
There's an older thread on this subject already open, I suggest it's best to keep it to one thread...
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
That it'll still make money and impress his fans?Horse wrote:Very poor.
Does Joshua's team know something that we don't?
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
That Joshua is an accident waiting to happen when he actually starts fighting genuine top 20 level heavyweights?BitPlayer wrote:That it'll still make money and impress his fans?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
yes, everything points to him being clowned by the likes of Malik Scott, Pulev and Teper.Horse wrote:That Joshua is an accident waiting to happen when he actually starts fighting genuine top 20 level heavyweights?BitPlayer wrote:That it'll still make money and impress his fans?
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Him never having fought anyone close to as good as any of them suggests that he might get clowned.Riddick Blowe wrote:yes, everything points to him being clowned by the likes of Malik Scott, Pulev and Teper.
David Price 2.0?
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Anyone might get clowned. He's shown enough to suggest those guys aren't good enough to live with him. Then what will you say?Horse wrote:Him never having fought anyone close to as good as any of them suggests that he might get clowned.Riddick Blowe wrote:yes, everything points to him being clowned by the likes of Malik Scott, Pulev and Teper.
David Price 2.0?
Last edited by Bard of Boxrec on 25 Apr 2016, 07:51, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
No, he hasn't.Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone might get clowned. He's showed enough to suggest those guys aren't good enough to live with him.
Joshua has shown very little except power.
Well done.Riddick Blowe wrote:Then what will you say?
-
tigermoth87
- Welterweight
- Posts: 1795
- Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
What a shock. The fraud finds a bum opponent. Breazeale isn't even top 20.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
I'd say that he is top 30, but only because he technically got the win against Mansour. A fight in which Breazeale was getting dominated.tigermoth87 wrote:What a shock. The fraud finds a bum opponent. Breazeale isn't even top 20.
Breazeale might not even be top 50 abilitywise.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
You have a very odd opinion of the strength of today's heavyweight division.Horse wrote:No, he hasn't.Riddick Blowe wrote:Anyone might get clowned. He's showed enough to suggest those guys aren't good enough to live with him.
Joshua has shown very little except power.
Well done.Riddick Blowe wrote:Then what will you say?
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
You don't seem to have a clue.Riddick Blowe wrote:You have a very odd opinion of the strength of today's heavyweight division.
Every possible Joshua opponent seems to be about equal to you.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Malik Scott is top 10 according to Boxrec. You probably think he's a stern test vs Joshua, solely because of that stat.Horse wrote:You don't seem to have a clue.Riddick Blowe wrote:You have a very odd opinion of the strength of today's heavyweight division.
Every possible Joshua opponent seems to be about equal to you.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
ppv headliner aswell, comical
joke fight, bermaine stiverne would of been much better.
eddie is frightened to put aj in there with somebody decent and barry hearn on IFL TV saying to fury if he ever ever has the guts to step into the ring with joshua he'd be losing his belts is just ridicolous
aj's team must know what alot of us already know but the passengers on the hype train and the casuals seem to be blind to at the minute.
joke fight, bermaine stiverne would of been much better.
eddie is frightened to put aj in there with somebody decent and barry hearn on IFL TV saying to fury if he ever ever has the guts to step into the ring with joshua he'd be losing his belts is just ridicolous
aj's team must know what alot of us already know but the passengers on the hype train and the casuals seem to be blind to at the minute.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
He would be Joshua's best opponent to date by far.Riddick Blowe wrote:Malik Scott is top 10 according to Boxrec. You probably think he's a stern test vs Joshua, solely because of that stat.
You look at Joshua smashing bums to pieces and assume that he'll be able to do the same when he steps up. He won't.
-
Bard of Boxrec
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 13113
- Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
You are pathetic. If Joshua vs Scott were to be signed, you would be incapable of predicting. Wilder destroying him in one would mean nothing to you. You are blinded by statistics and records. You seem to have no eyes. Or perception.Horse wrote:He would be Joshua's best opponent to date by far.Riddick Blowe wrote:Malik Scott is top 10 according to Boxrec. You probably think he's a stern test vs Joshua, solely because of that stat.
You look at Joshua smashing bums to pieces and assume that he'll be able to do the same when he steps up. He won't.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
The eye test is overrated, records tell a far more accurate story.Riddick Blowe wrote:You are pathetic. If Joshua vs Scott were to be signed, you would be incapable of predicting. Wilder destroying him in one would mean nothing to you. You are blinded by statistics and records. You seem to have no eyes. Or perception.
Scott would be a big step up for Joshua.
Joshua's record is very weak.
-
IRLangmaid25
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 3316
- Joined: 01 Feb 2010, 19:08
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
It's a keep busy fight that's all it is while introducing Anthony Joshua to an American audience at the same time is how I am envisaging until he has to take his mandatory which will be the winner of Joseph Parker v Carlos Takem.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Horse wrote:The eye test is overrated, records tell a far more accurate story.Riddick Blowe wrote:You are pathetic. If Joshua vs Scott were to be signed, you would be incapable of predicting. Wilder destroying him in one would mean nothing to you. You are blinded by statistics and records. You seem to have no eyes. Or perception.
Scott would be a big step up for Joshua.
Joshua's record is very weak.
Scott is absolute garbage, he doesn't even have a punchers chance. Maybe Breazeale has one, but the truth is neither of those mentioned should be within a hundred miles of a so-called world title. Shannon Briggs would probably be a better opponent than both of them.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Scott would beat Breazeale and Briggs easily.Ricky_ wrote:Scott is absolute garbage, he doesn't even have a punchers chance. Maybe Breazeale has one, but the truth is neither of those mentioned should be within a hundred miles of a so-called world title. Shannon Briggs would probably be a better opponent than both of them.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Horse wrote:Scott would beat Breazeale and Briggs easily.Ricky_ wrote:Scott is absolute garbage, he doesn't even have a punchers chance. Maybe Breazeale has one, but the truth is neither of those mentioned should be within a hundred miles of a so-called world title. Shannon Briggs would probably be a better opponent than both of them.
Tony Thompson is in probably worse shape than Briggs now and he put Scott on his ass in their last fight with a nothing punch that clipped his ear. Scott is woeful.
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
He might be woeful, but he'd still be Joshua's best opponent by far.Ricky_ wrote:Tony Thompson is in probably worse shape than Briggs now and he put Scott on his ass in their last fight with a nothing punch that clipped his ear. Scott is woeful.
-
Mighty Atom
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 262
- Joined: 11 Oct 2008, 19:00
Re: Joshua first defence vs Dominic Breazeale
Only possible fight for Joshua if he wants to fight in June.
Every other marketable fighter in the IBF rankings is either committed to another fight, injured, banned for doping or Andy Ruiz.
DB's unbeaten record is the only thing going for him but it's just enough to sell the fight.
His fluke win against Mansour means he lucks into a title fight though he's arguably not even as good as Charles Martin
Every other marketable fighter in the IBF rankings is either committed to another fight, injured, banned for doping or Andy Ruiz.
DB's unbeaten record is the only thing going for him but it's just enough to sell the fight.
His fluke win against Mansour means he lucks into a title fight though he's arguably not even as good as Charles Martin