Lets be clear about it
Lets be clear about it
rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
-
Deadendgeneration
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1906
- Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 19:01
Re: Lets be clear about it
Rigo may perhaps be the most skills, but his resume, particularly recently, doesn't hold up. His skills may have vastly deteriorated, he just hasn't fought anyone in years to show us either way. His chin makes him suspect in any p4p argument as well.Chepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
Re: Lets be clear about it
#1 p4p is either Kovalev or Golovkin. After Kovalev vs Ward if it ever happens, Ward may become #1.
Re: Lets be clear about it
Roman Gonzalez is HBO's number one. Considering he fights for HBO. That's their opinion. As far as I can see there is no legitimate number one since Mayweather left the sport. Or someone who everyone agrees upon...same name mentioned etc..
Re: Lets be clear about it
Ring has Gonzalez as p4p #1 followed by Kovalev, Golovkin and Ward.MachoTime wrote:Roman Gonzalez is HBO's number one. Considering he fights for HBO. That's their opinion. As far as I can see there is no legitimate number one since Mayweather left the sport. Or someone who everyone agrees upon...same name mentioned etc..
ESPN also has him #1 followed by Golovkin, Pac and Rigo.
What does it have to do with HBO ?
Re: Lets be clear about it
It means Ring and ESPN and HBO have Gonzalez number one..On BoxRec Canelo is number one. Gonzalez isn't in the running.ikorolev wrote:Ring has Gonzalez as p4p #1 followed by Kovalev, Golovkin and Ward.MachoTime wrote:Roman Gonzalez is HBO's number one. Considering he fights for HBO. That's their opinion. As far as I can see there is no legitimate number one since Mayweather left the sport. Or someone who everyone agrees upon...same name mentioned etc..
ESPN also has him #1 followed by Golovkin, Pac and Rigo.
What does it have to do with HBO ?
I don't agree with Gonzalez being number one. somewhere 6-12
You think Gonzalez is number one?
-
Baby Face Finster
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 17406
- Joined: 29 Dec 2004, 23:34
Re: Lets be clear about it
I don't care what anyone says Gonzalez is not #1. He gets hit way too much to be #1. As soon as he faces Inoue his undefeated record is gone.
Re: Lets be clear about it
Inoue is in a higher weight class and has a 3.5" reach advantage. Roman may not be #1, but he is definitely in top 5.Baby Face Finster wrote:I don't care what anyone says Gonzalez is not #1. He gets hit way too much to be #1. As soon as he faces Inoue his undefeated record is gone.
Re: Lets be clear about it
Baby Face Finster wrote:I don't care what anyone says Gonzalez is not #1. He gets hit way too much to be #1. As soon as he faces Inoue his undefeated record is gone.
roman isnt #1. rigo is much more athletic, would beat him a p4p sense. also inoue is more athletic, regarless of weight the better boxer.
but a lot of media sites have gonzale #1 not because he is the best boxer, but because he achieved the most. staying undefeated in 45 fights, beating very good opponents like estrada or viloria is impressiv.
but p4p isnt about who you beat, but who would beat who would say have close to the same height and weight. in these terms rigondeaux is the best. the most athletic, amongs the best footork, good power, great speed and technicly on an elite level that only a handful of boxer possess. gonzales is not on this level.
p4p
rigondeaux
lomachenko
inoue
in no particulor order are the best. if we talk who achieved the most, than guys like
gonzales
kovalev
canelo
Re: Lets be clear about it
Rigo is not the best P4P boxer on the planet. He has 1 significant win over a fighter who hasn't really looked good since. If anything his reputation is far overblownChepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
Re: Lets be clear about it
gilgamesh wrote:Rigo is not the best P4P boxer on the planet. He has 1 significant win over a fighter who hasn't really looked good since. If anything his reputation is far overblownChepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
tell me 2 boxers who would beat him p4p?
i bet you cant....and dont come with that ggg bullcrap, he would put a footwork and potshot clinic on that slow dude. tell me 2 guys with the combination of footwork, technic, speed and power that rigo possess......come on!?
Re: Lets be clear about it
One would be Loma. Smaller version of GGG would also beat him, and don't give us the "slow dude" bullcrap. Boxing is about timing, not an ability to hit mitts 100 times per second.Chepppaaa wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Rigo is not the best P4P boxer on the planet. He has 1 significant win over a fighter who hasn't really looked good since. If anything his reputation is far overblownChepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
tell me 2 boxers who would beat him p4p?
i bet you cant....and dont come with that ggg bullcrap, he would put a footwork and potshot clinic on that slow dude. tell me 2 guys with the combination of footwork, technic, speed and power that rigo possess......come on!?
Re: Lets be clear about it
ikorolev wrote:One would be Loma. Smaller version of GGG would also beat him, and don't give us the "slow dude" bullcrap. Boxing is about timing, not an ability to hit mitts 100 times per second.Chepppaaa wrote:gilgamesh wrote:
Rigo is not the best P4P boxer on the planet. He has 1 significant win over a fighter who hasn't really looked good since. If anything his reputation is far overblown
tell me 2 boxers who would beat him p4p?
i bet you cant....and dont come with that ggg bullcrap, he would put a footwork and potshot clinic on that slow dude. tell me 2 guys with the combination of footwork, technic, speed and power that rigo possess......come on!?
boxing is 70 % all speed. a reasonable top 5 p4p list ever, every single one is super fast, no matter feet and hand.
wanna try....
Re: Lets be clear about it
So, where are those fast opponents who can beat "slow" Golovkin ?
Re: Lets be clear about it
ikorolev wrote:So, where are those fast opponents who can beat "slow" Golovkin ?
i am not taking anything away from ggg, he is very good. but he is not fast and would lose in a p4p sense against the best boxer in the world and that is rigo.
at super middleweight direll is very fast
at middleweight nobody is very fast right now
at 154 lara is very fast
Re: Lets be clear about it
So, you are saying that GGG would not beat Lara and Dirrell ??? LOL !Chepppaaa wrote:ikorolev wrote:So, where are those fast opponents who can beat "slow" Golovkin ?
i am not taking anything away from ggg, he is very good. but he is not fast and would lose in a p4p sense against the best boxer in the world and that is rigo.
at super middleweight direll is very fast
at middleweight nobody is very fast right now
at 154 lara is very fast
Re: Lets be clear about it
ikorolev wrote:So, you are saying that GGG would not beat Lara and Dirrell ??? LOL !Chepppaaa wrote:ikorolev wrote:So, where are those fast opponents who can beat "slow" Golovkin ?
i am not taking anything away from ggg, he is very good. but he is not fast and would lose in a p4p sense against the best boxer in the world and that is rigo.
at super middleweight direll is very fast
at middleweight nobody is very fast right now
at 154 lara is very fast
direll would win
lara not
Re: Lets be clear about it
Dirrell lost in amateurs. There is no way he beats GGG now.Chepppaaa wrote:ikorolev wrote:So, you are saying that GGG would not beat Lara and Dirrell ??? LOL !Chepppaaa wrote:
i am not taking anything away from ggg, he is very good. but he is not fast and would lose in a p4p sense against the best boxer in the world and that is rigo.
at super middleweight direll is very fast
at middleweight nobody is very fast right now
at 154 lara is very fast
direll would win
lara not
Re: Lets be clear about it
I don't think we gotta argue P4P who could beat him. I think other Featherweights could beat him. Like Vasyl Lomachenko for instance, and yes I hate to break it to ya, but if they were the same size GGG would kick his ass and knock him out.Chepppaaa wrote:gilgamesh wrote:Rigo is not the best P4P boxer on the planet. He has 1 significant win over a fighter who hasn't really looked good since. If anything his reputation is far overblownChepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
tell me 2 boxers who would beat him p4p?
i bet you cant....and dont come with that ggg bullcrap, he would put a footwork and potshot clinic on that slow dude. tell me 2 guys with the combination of footwork, technic, speed and power that rigo possess......come on!?
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Lets be clear about it
P4p fighters who beat Rigo?
Inoue and Lomachenko
Inoue and Lomachenko
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: Lets be clear about it
Gonzales is another HBO hype job.Chepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
He's really like #10 p4p.
Most of career is against total bums.
He's still in the emerging part of his career in terms of resume.
There's no way his resume compares to Kovalev.
HBO wants another Manny.
Re: Lets be clear about it
Yep, another bum beater/hype job like MannyBAD INTENTIONS wrote: Gonzales is another HBO hype job.
He's really like #10 p4p.
Most of career is against total bums.
He's still in the emerging part of his career in terms of resume.
There's no way his resume compares to Kovalev.
HBO wants another Manny.
-
BAD INTENTIONS
- Heavyweight

- Posts: 1885
- Joined: 22 Oct 2005, 17:45
Re: Lets be clear about it
I didn't say Manny is a bum beater.ikorolev wrote:Yep, another bum beater/hype job like MannyBAD INTENTIONS wrote: Gonzales is another HBO hype job.
He's really like #10 p4p.
Most of career is against total bums.
He's still in the emerging part of his career in terms of resume.
There's no way his resume compares to Kovalev.
HBO wants another Manny.
Save that garbage response for some of the other guys here.
HBO is trying to star build around power and fighting style.
And yes, if you are really #10 p4p, and you are being sold as #1 p4p, you are overrated/overhyped.
Just like if you aren't even top 7 at welterweight, but you are fighting for the middleweight title.
While HBO, kings of integrity and matchmaking, are selling it as 100% legitimate.
I hope NETFLIX gets into boxing.
Re: Lets be clear about it
HBO just want to keep working with Canelo/GBP, so they have to support (up to a certain limit) what they want.
-
Boxing Prospect
- Light Heavyweight
- Posts: 6592
- Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 14:35
Re: Lets be clear about it
Wins over Niida, Takayama, Hirales-Garcia,Rodriguez, Yaegashi, Fuentes, Estrada,Yaegashi, Sosa, Viloria and Arroyo doesn't compare?BAD INTENTIONS wrote:Gonzales is another HBO hype job.Chepppaaa wrote:rigondeaux is the best boxer p4p on the planet.
gonzales is the boxer p4p who achieved the most.
He's really like #10 p4p.
Most of career is against total bums.
He's still in the emerging part of his career in terms of resume.
There's no way his resume compares to Kovalev.
HBO wants another Manny.
A 3 weight champion who won his first title almost 8 years ago is just "emerging"?
Truth is he's just emerging.in the US market, reality is he's a fighter who has emerged as a world class talent before Kovalev had even made his pro debut.
Can't wait for Inoue to make his US debut and see fans say he's never fought in front of an audience like the HBO one whilst his fights on Fuji T.v. draw draw circa 8million viewers...