Latest IBF Rankings

MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Latest IBF Rankings

Post by MarkMcBurney »

Well it looks like Hearn will angle for the winner of Chisora v Pulev, with Dereck up to number 6 (no no.1 or no.2). David Haye up in to 11th bizarrely, and Hughie Fury 14.

Looks like Chisora/Pulev or Haye may be on the agenda this year for AJ...?

EDIT: Rankings: http://www.ibfusbaregistration.com/ibfu ... w=rankings
Champion : Anthony Joshua, Englang
WBA : Tyson Fury, England
WBC : Deontay Wilder, United States
WBO : Tyson Fury, England

1 NOT RATED
2 NOT RATED
3 Carlos Takam, France
4 Joseph Parker, New Zealand
5 Kubrat Pulev, Bulgaria
6 Derek Chisora, Zimbabwe
7 Vyacheslav Glazkov, Ukraine
8 Andy Ruiz, Mexico
9 Charles Martin, United States
10 Johan Duhaupas, France
11 David Haye, United Kingdom
12 Eric Molina, United States
13 Dominic Breazeale, United States
14 Hugie Fury, England
15 Jarrell Miller, United States
Last edited by MarkMcBurney on 05 May 2016, 13:03, edited 1 time in total.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by crusader »

The Chisora-Pulev winner would be a good second defense.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

crusader wrote:The Chisora-Pulev winner would be a good second defense.
It would be very good.

He would become a credible title holder if he beats the winner of that fight.
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by MarkMcBurney »

Horse wrote:
crusader wrote:The Chisora-Pulev winner would be a good second defense.
It would be very good.

He would become a credible title holder if he beats the winner of that fight.
Agree with this. Particularly if it's Pulev and he deals with him better than Wlad did. (Or Chisora and deals with him better than Haye did).
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

Im trying to get my head around the fact that hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world :oo That means there are only 13 other men on this planet that currently better than him. Ive actually asked my wife to kick me in the bollox to see if im actually dreaming, unfortunately not however shes licking them now so thats a bonus.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:Im trying to get my head around the fact that hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world :oo That means there are only 13 other men on this planet that currently better than him. Ive actually asked my wife to kick me in the bollox to see if im actually dreaming, unfortunately not however shes licking them now so thats a bonus.
He's better than Breazeale.
nitro5912
Middleweight
Posts: 733
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 13:02

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by nitro5912 »

How can martin still be in there after his pitiful defence. I don't think he would be beat many of those below hin
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

nitro5912 wrote:How can martin still be in there after his pitiful defence. I don't think he would be beat many of those below hin
I think that it's fair enough that he stays in the rankings considering he was their champion a month ago.

As long as he doesn't manage to sneak back up into a mandatory position without doing anything (it's the IBF, so I wouldn't be surprised) then it doesn't really matter.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by wesshaw1985 »

why are 1 and 2 still vacant?
couldn't they just move the list up 2 places and put 2 fresh names on the list?
Haye has snuck in I see, potential 2016 opponent for AJ I reckon...
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Im trying to get my head around the fact that hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world :oo That means there are only 13 other men on this planet that currently better than him. Ive actually asked my wife to kick me in the bollox to see if im actually dreaming, unfortunately not however shes licking them now so thats a bonus.
He's better than Breazeale.

Thats not the point, well it is if he is rated higher, but listen, 'Hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world'. That means only another 13 men on this planet are better than him, 13 men. Thats this many. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. thats 13, thats 13 men, only 13 men in the world are better than Hughie Fury, 13, 1 and 3 make 13, its 13.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:Thats not the point, well it is if he is rated higher, but listen, 'Hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world'. That means only another 13 men on this planet are better than him, 13 men. Thats this many. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. thats 13, thats 13 men, only 13 men in the world are better than Hughie Fury, 13, 1 and 3 make 13, its 13.
Never seen crap world rankings before?

There are far worse fighters than Hughie Fury in the ABC world rankings.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Thats not the point, well it is if he is rated higher, but listen, 'Hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world'. That means only another 13 men on this planet are better than him, 13 men. Thats this many. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. thats 13, thats 13 men, only 13 men in the world are better than Hughie Fury, 13, 1 and 3 make 13, its 13.
Never seen crap world rankings before?

There are far worse fighters than Hughie Fury in the ABC world rankings.
Regardless, I just cannot believe out of the best 14 heavyweight boxers in the world mr H Fury is stood in that line.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:Regardless, I just cannot believe out of the best 14 heavyweight boxers in the world mr H Fury is stood in that line.
How is his ranking any worse than having Jarrell Miller in there?
Sklar
Middleweight
Posts: 5680
Joined: 21 Sep 2013, 09:06

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Sklar »

On the basis Fury beats Wlad, being 'stripped ' of the IBF has really worked in Fury's favour. He's going to have fought all the big names before he gets landed with a mandatory. Wlad, Joshua (unification), Wilder (unification), Haye (voluntary), retire. WBA mandatory, Ortiz?, won't get a look in. Smart move, if it was a move, seeing as Ortiz is the best out there.
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:Regardless, I just cannot believe out of the best 14 heavyweight boxers in the world mr H Fury is stood in that line.
How is his ranking any worse than having Jarrell Miller in there?
cannot comment as ive not seen him fight. But what ive seen of Fury, he aint world class
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

How can H F have a ranking of 16 in Europe but at world level 14? dont make any sense.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

mimmy123 wrote:How can H F have a ranking of 16 in Europe but at world level 14? dont make any sense.
Yes, it does.

The IBF can rank who they want.
rossij8
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 1746
Joined: 16 Jul 2012, 08:06

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by rossij8 »

How can Haye come back in so high

Out for 4 years and beats a tomato can
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by JimJim2009 »

Chisora's ranking is not right, that is well dodgy. It's for nothing as he won't beat pulev but he should not be that high.
Londonirish
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3064
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 13:02

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Londonirish »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
Horse wrote:
crusader wrote:The Chisora-Pulev winner would be a good second defense.
It would be very good.

He would become a credible title holder if he beats the winner of that fight.
Agree with this. Particularly if it's Pulev and he deals with him better than Wlad did. (Or Chisora and deals with him better than Haye did).


Only if its Pulev, he's already Beat Derek twice.............
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Horse »

JimJim2009 wrote:Chisora's ranking is not right, that is well dodgy. It's for nothing as he won't beat pulev but he should not be that high.
How is it well dodgy?

Of all the clowns in the ABC world rankings you complain about that?
Mimmy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Mimmy »

Horse wrote:
mimmy123 wrote:How can H F have a ranking of 16 in Europe but at world level 14? dont make any sense.
Yes, it does.

The IBF can rank who they want.
Exactly so its an unfair comparrison to most of the heavyweight boxers in the world.

I'm glad we came to the outcome I was looking for
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by Autobarn »

mimmy123 wrote:Im trying to get my head around the fact that hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world :oo That means there are only 13 other men on this planet that currently better than him. Ive actually asked my wife to kick me in the bollox to see if im actually dreaming, unfortunately not however shes licking them now so thats a bonus.
Well the maths makes sense when you take into account there's four major organisations.

Unless he's ranked in them as well.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by BitPlayer »

These rankings are terrible.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: Latest IBF Rankings

Post by BitPlayer »

Horse wrote:
JimJim2009 wrote:Chisora's ranking is not right, that is well dodgy. It's for nothing as he won't beat pulev but he should not be that high.
How is it well dodgy?

Of all the clowns in the ABC world rankings you complain about that?
He hasn't really done anything of note since Fury, but then other people in the rankings that haven't done anything of note at all. I think the key is not to read it as "the top fighters in the world" but as "a bunch of names we pulled out of our ass and vaguely ordered them in terms of recent wins."
Post Reply