I don't understand Joshua deal

magnus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1175
Joined: 13 Dec 2004, 08:59

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by magnus »

jamesmcdonnell wrote:
Sklar wrote:I fon't know. That's what I was getting at. I don't know what he got convicted for but I assume it was just a bit of small time dealing? He doesn't strike me as having the gumption to be any more than a low level street pusher.
From what I understand with a good legal team minor convictions can be overcome.

For the average Joe, any declaration of prior convictions means being sent straight home, never to return.

I have to lie every time I go to the states on the boarding card, because of a fine and caution I got 23 years ago!
I think if you have priors or any police record should apply for a visa waiver before travelling. It involves a bit of paperwork and a trip to the US embassy in London for an appointment (or used to a few years ago). They then check your record and decide whether or not to let you go over there. I think most people are allowed in, but you just need to plan ahead. If you turn up at the airport and they run checks and find you out, that's when you will get turned away.

Joshua should be fine to travel/box to the USA, as long as they don't leave it till the last minute to apply. I think that happened to a Brit boxer fairlyt recently, although can't recall who it was!
ashedward
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 420
Joined: 19 Apr 2009, 16:17

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by ashedward »

PredatorHayds wrote:Does Mr Haymon now own a percentage of AJ.

I can see a UK staged PBC event on the cards in the next year.
Nope, in regards a pbc event in the UK it's likely, there was rumours of an itv deal but it has gone quiet on that front.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Stuarty30 wrote:
SNG wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I can't remember any events starting between midnight and 2am.
Calzaghe-Lacy and Hatton-Tszyu were very late, although I'm not sure exactly how late.
I'm sure Hatton was around 2am. I remember having to watch it again the following day because I was pie eyed by the time it came on!
I don't remember Calzaghe-Lacy being quite as late as the Hatton fight, but it was certainly later than usual. The Froch-Dirrell fight felt the latest to me, probably because the undercard finished about 3 fvcking hours earlier.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by Stuarty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
SNG wrote:
Calzaghe-Lacy and Hatton-Tszyu were very late, although I'm not sure exactly how late.
I'm sure Hatton was around 2am. I remember having to watch it again the following day because I was pie eyed by the time it came on!
I don't remember Calzaghe-Lacy being quite as late as the Hatton fight, but it was certainly later than usual. The Froch-Dirrell fight felt the latest to me, probably because the undercard finished about 3 fvcking hours earlier.
Yeah and because the fight itself was a complete stinker! I remember just wanting it to end!
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
I'm sure Hatton was around 2am. I remember having to watch it again the following day because I was pie eyed by the time it came on!
I don't remember Calzaghe-Lacy being quite as late as the Hatton fight, but it was certainly later than usual. The Froch-Dirrell fight felt the latest to me, probably because the undercard finished about 3 fvcking hours earlier.
Yeah and because the fight itself was a complete stinker! I remember just wanting it to end!
Same, I was completely tanked on JD that night as well, could hardly stay awake for the main event, should have just gone to sleep really!
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by Stuarty »

Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
I don't remember Calzaghe-Lacy being quite as late as the Hatton fight, but it was certainly later than usual. The Froch-Dirrell fight felt the latest to me, probably because the undercard finished about 3 fvcking hours earlier.
Yeah and because the fight itself was a complete stinker! I remember just wanting it to end!
Same, I was completely tanked on JD that night as well, could hardly stay awake for the main event, should have just gone to sleep really!
Hopefully this weekend ain't the same! Loooong night to stay up!
rd350lc
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4942
Joined: 22 Nov 2014, 11:49

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by rd350lc »

mickey1975 wrote:
SNG wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:I can't remember any events starting between midnight and 2am.
Calzaghe-Lacy and Hatton-Tszyu were very late, although I'm not sure exactly how late.
Both after 2. I was at both.
my worn out old memory told me Calzaghe-lacy was on ITV tennish , must be losing the plot bigstyle .
Cyclops
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5744
Joined: 13 Jun 2009, 04:14

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by Cyclops »

09Lulu wrote:I think Haye v Macaranelli was late
I think so too
jamesmcdonnell
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 45238
Joined: 12 Nov 2003, 06:11

Re: I don't understand Joshua deal

Post by jamesmcdonnell »

Stuarty30 wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
I'm sure Hatton was around 2am. I remember having to watch it again the following day because I was pie eyed by the time it came on!
I don't remember Calzaghe-Lacy being quite as late as the Hatton fight, but it was certainly later than usual. The Froch-Dirrell fight felt the latest to me, probably because the undercard finished about 3 fvcking hours earlier.
Yeah and because the fight itself was a complete stinker! I remember just wanting it to end!
Yeah I remember bitterly regretting wasting my time sitting up watching that.
Post Reply