Latest IBF Rankings
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Worst Rankings ever the best 2 heavyweights in the World Wlad and Tyson arent even ranked... Wlad undisputed king and wrongly stripped Tyson.. Joke off a organisation the Matchroom sponsored IBF
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
In fairness not ranking belt holders is fairly standard. I think they are more supposed to be about working your way up to a shot rather than actually the best, though these clowncar rankings shouldn't be used even for that.daviddee wrote:Worst Rankings ever the best 2 heavyweights in the World Wlad and Tyson arent even ranked... Wlad undisputed king and wrongly stripped Tyson.. Joke off a organisation the Matchroom sponsored IBF
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
With places 1 and 2 empty and the next 4 in eliminators to fill the top 2 spots spots, that effectively means that Glazkov will be No 3 next month and Martin No 5. They will be in eliminators before 2016 ends and one could be mandatory for Joshua by early next year.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings
If you ignore Povetkin, Wilder, Tyson, Klitschko, Ortiz, and have a bit of drawish guys between 15 and 25, then yes 13 could become what you get. Also who knows there are way lower ranked fighters that will simply need more time to prove themself, like Whyte, Spong, that Chinese Ortiz, can't remember his name and so on.mimmy123 wrote:Horse wrote:He's better than Breazeale.mimmy123 wrote:Im trying to get my head around the fact that hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the worldThat means there are only 13 other men on this planet that currently better than him. Ive actually asked my wife to kick me in the bollox to see if im actually dreaming, unfortunately not however shes licking them now so thats a bonus.
Thats not the point, well it is if he is rated higher, but listen, 'Hughie Fury is the 14th best heavyweight boxer in the world'. That means only another 13 men on this planet are better than him, 13 men. Thats this many. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. thats 13, thats 13 men, only 13 men in the world are better than Hughie Fury, 13, 1 and 3 make 13, its 13.
Last edited by asdfjkl on 06 May 2016, 03:59, edited 1 time in total.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I was referring to a defence for Joshua, not Fury.Londonirish wrote:MarkMcBurney wrote:Agree with this. Particularly if it's Pulev and he deals with him better than Wlad did. (Or Chisora and deals with him better than Haye did).Horse wrote:It would be very good.
He would become a credible title holder if he beats the winner of that fight.
Only if its Pulev, he's already Beat Derek twice.............
-
PredatorHayds
- Super Welterweight
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Am I the only one that thinks that Top 15 isn't too bad as governing body rankings go. Especially by IBF standards.
-
MarkMcBurney
- Super Middleweight
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I've certainly seen worse. I mean, at least everyone in this top 15 (well, 13) is actually alive.PredatorHayds wrote:Am I the only one that thinks that Top 15 isn't too bad as governing body rankings go. Especially by IBF standards.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings
That's because there are way too many weightclasses out there, somehow the heavyweight division is too much interesting for such big mistakesMarkMcBurney wrote:I've certainly seen worse. I mean, at least everyone in this top 15 (well, 13) is actually alive.PredatorHayds wrote:Am I the only one that thinks that Top 15 isn't too bad as governing body rankings go. Especially by IBF standards.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17120
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Not if Pulev wins..... which he will.crusader wrote:The Chisora-Pulev winner would be a good second defense.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Why not?
Don't think AJ would be ready?
Don't think AJ would be ready?
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I believe fighters involved in a matchup for another world title are removed from the rankings -- hence no Wlad or Pov.
That Said if EH and Joshua want to fight gimmes for a while the IBF rankings are full of them. And who has Parker fought to be ranked 3? I'm certain that with the right promoter any HW with a 15-0 record can get a top 15 abc ranking... even if he'd fought my nan all 15 times.
That Said if EH and Joshua want to fight gimmes for a while the IBF rankings are full of them. And who has Parker fought to be ranked 3? I'm certain that with the right promoter any HW with a 15-0 record can get a top 15 abc ranking... even if he'd fought my nan all 15 times.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17120
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I just think it's an unnecessary risk to take at this point. If I was AJ's promoter, I wouldn't take that fight unless it was a mandatory.crusader wrote:Why not?
Don't think AJ would be ready?
Is AJ ready? It's hard to tell as there are still so many questions yet to be answered.
It's the same when Sascha Povetkin lamps Wilder. No way I would put AJ in with Povetkin.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I'll see how Pulev looks against Chisora, but I think he's a bit overrated; he's a solid boxer with snappy punches, but he isn't a big hitter, particularly tough to hit, or especially durable. It wouldn't be a Martin/Breazeale gimme defense, but I don't think Joshua needs to be wrapped in wool and he has shown me enough that I'd favour him over Pulev. With a convincing win in that bout he'd gain significantly more credibility, and I think that's worth the amount of risk that accompanies taking the fight.
Also, I didn't mean 'good' simply in terms of what minimizes risk for team AJ. If that was my mindset I'd applaud bouts against people like Martin and Breazeale, but I'm not.
Also, I didn't mean 'good' simply in terms of what minimizes risk for team AJ. If that was my mindset I'd applaud bouts against people like Martin and Breazeale, but I'm not.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17120
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Chisora is finished at top level and I would be stunned if Pulev didn't stop him in this fight.crusader wrote:I'll see how Pulev looks against Chisora, but I think he's a bit overrated; he's a solid boxer with snappy punches, but he isn't a big hitter, particularly tough to hit, or especially durable. It wouldn't be a Martin/Breazeale gimme defense, but I don't think Joshua needs to be wrapped in wool and he has shown me enough that I'd favour him over Pulev. With a convincing win in that bout he'd gain significantly more credibility, and I think that's worth the amount of risk that accompanies taking the fight.
Also, I didn't mean 'good' simply in terms of what minimizes risk for team AJ. If that was my mindset I'd applaud bouts against people like Martin and Breazeale, but I'm not.
As I just said in another thread. Out of the boxers in the IBF rankings, only four are available on that date and two of them have already been stopped by Wilder. Breazeale is as good as anyone else available.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Okay....I never suggested that Breazeale was any worse than the other available options.
-
keithmoonhangover
- Cruiserweight
- Posts: 17120
- Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
I didn't say you did mate, I apologize if it came across in the wrong way.crusader wrote:Okay....I never suggested that Breazeale was any worse than the other available options.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Actually, I think he's probably a worse fighter than Duhaupas and he has no performance as impressive as the latter's destruction of Helenius, but given that he's a big, unbeaten Olympian with a high KO ratio I imagine that he's an easier sell to the casuals.
Either way it seemed like pretty slim picking given who was available.
Either way it seemed like pretty slim picking given who was available.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings
There are many 15 0 boxers out there that aren't ranked by any ranking and are out of the top 100 boxrecTaki... wrote:I believe fighters involved in a matchup for another world title are removed from the rankings -- hence no Wlad or Pov.
That Said if EH and Joshua want to fight gimmes for a while the IBF rankings are full of them. And who has Parker fought to be ranked 3? I'm certain that with the right promoter any HW with a 15-0 record can get a top 15 abc ranking... even if he'd fought my nan all 15 times.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
He's clearly inferior to Duhaupas.crusader wrote:Actually, I think he's probably a worse fighter than Duhaupas and he has no performance as impressive as the latter's destruction of Helenius, but given that he's a big, unbeaten Olympian with a high KO ratio I imagine that he's an easier sell to the casuals.
Either way it seemed like pretty slim picking given who was available.
Is there any real debate about that?
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Clearly they don't have the right promoter.asdfjkl wrote:There are many 15 0 boxers out there that aren't ranked by any ranking and are out of the top 100 boxrecTaki... wrote:I believe fighters involved in a matchup for another world title are removed from the rankings -- hence no Wlad or Pov.
That Said if EH and Joshua want to fight gimmes for a while the IBF rankings are full of them. And who has Parker fought to be ranked 3? I'm certain that with the right promoter any HW with a 15-0 record can get a top 15 abc ranking... even if he'd fought my nan all 15 times.
-
asdfjkl
- Heavyweight

Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Perhaps, or they are young, or they simply don't have the skills to achieve much higher ranks, either way, it's just a different route, Wilder never boxed someone in his first 25 matches either.Taki... wrote:Clearly they don't have the right promoter.asdfjkl wrote:There are many 15 0 boxers out there that aren't ranked by any ranking and are out of the top 100 boxrecTaki... wrote:I believe fighters involved in a matchup for another world title are removed from the rankings -- hence no Wlad or Pov.
That Said if EH and Joshua want to fight gimmes for a while the IBF rankings are full of them. And who has Parker fought to be ranked 3? I'm certain that with the right promoter any HW with a 15-0 record can get a top 15 abc ranking... even if he'd fought my nan all 15 times.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
As Takam and Parker are rated after Joshua. The winner of that fight should be mandatory. It's a final eliminator apparently. However it wouldn't really surprise me if Derek beats Pulev the IBF will make him mandatory instead (unless Takam wins). Giving Joshua more time before fighting anyone who could trouble him. I just hope some bum doesn't jump into their none ranked 1 and 2 positions out of nowhere and we see Joshua defending his title against no-hopers.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
If Chisora can beat Pulev then why can't he also beat the relatively untested Joshua?Exoddus wrote:As Takam and Parker are rated after Joshua. The winner of that fight should be mandatory. It's a final eliminator apparently. However it wouldn't really surprise me if Derek beats Pulev the IBF will make him mandatory instead (unless Takam wins). Giving Joshua more time before fighting anyone who could trouble him. I just hope some bum doesn't jump into their none ranked 1 and 2 positions out of nowhere and we see Joshua defending his title against no-hopers.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
Chisora wouldn't beat Joshua.Horse wrote:If Chisora can beat Pulev then why can't he also beat the relatively untested Joshua?Exoddus wrote:As Takam and Parker are rated after Joshua. The winner of that fight should be mandatory. It's a final eliminator apparently. However it wouldn't really surprise me if Derek beats Pulev the IBF will make him mandatory instead (unless Takam wins). Giving Joshua more time before fighting anyone who could trouble him. I just hope some bum doesn't jump into their none ranked 1 and 2 positions out of nowhere and we see Joshua defending his title against no-hopers.
Re: Latest IBF Rankings
If he can beat Pulev then he can beat Joshua.Stuarty30 wrote:Chisora wouldn't beat Joshua.