Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Canelo vs. Khan Winner and How?

Poll ended at 03 Feb 2016, 13:14

Canelo Stoppage
154
69%
Canelo Decision
13
6%
Draw
4
2%
Amir Khan Decision
45
20%
Amir Khan Stoppage
6
3%
 
Total votes: 222

magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by magwitch »

gilgamesh wrote:
Sisyphus wrote:
magwitch wrote:
Marco Barrera*

* :OhYes:
(Sorry but I was just answering your question).
True (must say I forgot him) but he didn't 'win the 1st 4 rounds, then blow it in a second' against him as skanksta asserts.
Yeah, but Barrera was well past his best both age wise and weight wise. He never belonged at Lightweight and it showed.
I agree with you about not being prime. Hence the :OhYes:
Prime Barrera probably a different weight to Khan - and probably still beats him.
But I must say I was there that night and Barrera was comfortably looking after himself until he got cut. He did not resemble a man that was stressed, or had bitten off too much......like we saw tonight.

I make a case for Amir hanging them up. Thurman and Brook can both knock him out. Not saying would do but certainly within their capability. I’d walk away now if I was Khan. He has served with distinction imo.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by crusader »

mickey1975 wrote:Khan was behind at the finish. He only won one round on one card.
Dreadful scoring....he deserved a minimum of 3 rounds.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47079
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by gilgamesh »

Yeah, and he'll never see a bigger payday than he saw tonight.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47079
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by gilgamesh »

crusader wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Khan was behind at the finish. He only won one round on one card.
Dreadful scoring....he deserved a minimum of 3 rounds.
Looks like the Judges were gonna make damn sure the cash cow didn't lose. I had Khan up 4 rounds to 1 after 5. Can't say I'm surprised to hear this though.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by crusader »

Makes me wonder if Canelo simply needs to last the distance with GGG to get a win. There have been several fights now where judges were cleary on Canelo's side and turned in scores that gave it a 'scored before the fight started' feeling.
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by lillywhite14 »

The Mayweather fight showed the fix is always in when it comes to Canelo. Had he genuinely won 2 or 3 rounds that night he would have "won" a comfortable decision!
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47079
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by gilgamesh »

lillywhite14 wrote:The Mayweather fight showed the fix is always in when it comes to Canelo. Had he genuinely won 2 or 3 rounds that night he would have "won" a comfortable decision!
Bad judging can't save you from getting stopped. GGG has had a habit of almost hitting guys when they're down in fights though. He damn sure better watch that against Canelo cuz he'd get DQ'd for sure even if he barely tapped him on the ground.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by crusader »

Murray almost made it 12 though and Canelo is very sturdy. I can see him getting dominated in the ring but just making it to the finish, putting it in the judges' hands.
mullenman
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1124
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 11:10

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by mullenman »

Great fight

If khan only won one round wbc are curupt

We all know they are before then stupid cards
rossco3343
Super Middleweight
Posts: 19
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 08:26

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by rossco3343 »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:That was a heavy landing. Khan sure had some balls to take that fight hope he retires now he has had his payday.
He'll fight Brook. He wanted his massive us payday against mayweather / pacman but took alvarez where a loss still means he gets big UK payday, never worked the other way if Brook chinned him first
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by magwitch »

ThereByTheGrace wrote:That was a heavy landing. Khan sure had some balls to take that fight hope he retires now he has had his payday.
Yes x2

I would say this was a “money fight”.....but I’ve got no doubt that Amir did everything in his power to win and believed that he could :bow: :bow: :bow:
Bard of Boxrec
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13114
Joined: 22 Feb 2002, 20:00

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Bard of Boxrec »

crusader wrote:Murray almost made it 12 though and Canelo is very sturdy. I can see him getting dominated in the ring but just making it to the finish, putting it in the judges' hands.
Murray was negative though. Canelo will get busted up and stopped. He's too slow and ponderous for GGG.
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by BigDoofus »

rossco3343 wrote:
ThereByTheGrace wrote:That was a heavy landing. Khan sure had some balls to take that fight hope he retires now he has had his payday.
He'll fight Brook. He wanted his massive us payday against mayweather / pacman but took alvarez where a loss still means he gets big UK payday, never worked the other way if Brook chinned him first
I can't see him fighting Brook. He can take a loss to Alvarez, but losing to Brook would destroy him.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by keithmoonhangover »

gilgamesh wrote:Yeah, and he'll never see a bigger payday than he saw tonight.
He was offered more money on fight Brook. Fighting Canelo wasn't about the money, it was about getting a big fight in the States.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Counter-puncher »

Riddick Blowe wrote:
crusader wrote:Murray almost made it 12 though and Canelo is very sturdy. I can see him getting dominated in the ring but just making it to the finish, putting it in the judges' hands.
Murray was negative though.

Canelo will get busted up and stopped. He's too slow and ponderous for GGG.
:TU: Murray not letting his hands go was the only reason he made it past 8
Rexob
Middleweight
Posts: 6025
Joined: 20 Mar 2014, 15:17

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Rexob »

He will fight Brook, Khan's massive ego won't let him not fight Brook and it's another fantastic money fight.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Counter-puncher »

crusader wrote:
mickey1975 wrote:Khan was behind at the finish. He only won one round on one card.
:witzend:
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

Khan needs to take that Brook money then retire, nothing left for him to do.
M.E.N end of the year or early next. Cash out.

Question. Does Khan Brook realistically sell out Wembley or Millenium Stadium or is it an M.E.N fight max?
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by keithmoonhangover »

wesshaw1985 wrote:Khan needs to take that Brook money then retire, nothing left for him to do.
M.E.N end of the year or early next. Cash out...
Mate, it's got nothing to do with money for Khan. He doesn't need the money.
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by keithmoonhangover »

Khan will be fighting Danny Garcia next. Not because he's avoiding Brook, it's because he wants to avenge the loss.
davie
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 6763
Joined: 21 Aug 2010, 00:45

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by davie »

mickey1975 wrote:Khan was behind at the finish. He only won one round on one card.
Thank fornicate it never went to cards then.
If Khan could have kept that up for most of the fight he'd have been on the end of an outrageous decision.
Canelo will never loseba point decision there if they only gave khan one round on one card.
Unbelievable.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by freddydoesdallas »

keithmoonhangover wrote:Khan will be fighting Danny Garcia next. Not because he's avoiding Brook, it's because he wants to avenge the loss.
:lol: :lol:

First time for everything I guess!
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Only just seen the stoppage, haven't seen the rest of the fight yet. Pretty straight forward shot that landed. Was he going back in a straight line for all the fight or had he just tired at that point?
Terminator666
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1665
Joined: 06 Nov 2007, 10:18

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Terminator666 »

If Canelo and GGG meet before Candlo waits for him to get old, then it will be interesting to see at which weight. GGG stating he won't co e down from 160.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by crusader »

freddydoesdallas wrote:Only just seen the stoppage, haven't seen the rest of the fight yet. Pretty straight forward shot that landed. Was he going back in a straight line for all the fight or had he just tired at that point?
He was moving well laterally until the fifth, then he started to go back in straight lines more.
Post Reply