Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Canelo vs. Khan Winner and How?

Poll ended at 03 Feb 2016, 13:14

Canelo Stoppage
154
69%
Canelo Decision
13
6%
Draw
4
2%
Amir Khan Decision
45
20%
Amir Khan Stoppage
6
3%
 
Total votes: 222

tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by tobyh5 »

I felt Khan was boxing well in the first three rounds although the second could arguably been an even round. Canelo began to catch him in the fourth, really closed the gap in the fifth and from then on the end was obvious. Not only did Canelo bring more intensity to the table from the 4th round, but Khan then slowed down in the 5th and began making mistakes. Add those two things together and the KO was coming.

But that boy has my respect and has balls of steel. I think Brook is an embarrassment and his whole career has been full of promise but ended up one of wasted chances, easy options, and for some reason, just missing out on any significant fights. One good win versus someone like Porter does not make a great career. Porter was good, but he was not considered a P4P'er but at the time, arguably the 3rd best in the division, also arguably the 4th.

Khan has always given it a go, done what it takes to have the big fights, challenged himself and I hope he gets a comeback fight, clears his head, puts this behind him, then spanks Brook (and for years, I was not a Khan hater but certainly not a fan)
samwbr
Middleweight
Posts: 10164
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 15:34

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by samwbr »

Khan was fucked at the end of the 4th round, he looked like he knew what was coming when he was back on his stool.
jimcook
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 842
Joined: 28 Jun 2005, 14:05

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by jimcook »

khan ran for 5 rounds and got iced in 6. he landed no punches of any consequence at any time. few flurries that barely landed. usain bolt would have had trouble catching up to khan tonight. yous idiots that had khan up 4 rounds amaze me......nearly as much as the idiots that think khan has been relevant even at welter. only thing left for khan is to go to the olympics and try and get gold against some young boys. hes got zero shame and i wouldnt put it past him..
now you can get on board with brook, our real welterweight champ. ithink kell would have done him quicker tonight.
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32967
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Just watched the fight as didn't fancy an all nighter after all. Went exactly how most of us predicted it would - Khan looked good early until he slowed, then Canelo timed him & stopped him with a single shot. Enjoyable fight while it lasted, Khan is just far too fragile unfortunately.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by freddydoesdallas »

tobyh5 wrote:I felt Khan was boxing well in the first three rounds although the second could arguably been an even round. Canelo began to catch him in the fourth, really closed the gap in the fifth and from then on the end was obvious. Not only did Canelo bring more intensity to the table from the 4th round, but Khan then slowed down in the 5th and began making mistakes. Add those two things together and the KO was coming.

But that boy has my respect and has balls of steel. I think Brook is an embarrassment and his whole career has been full of promise but ended up one of wasted chances, easy options, and for some reason, just missing out on any significant fights. One good win versus someone like Porter does not make a great career. Porter was good, but he was not considered a P4P'er but at the time, arguably the 3rd best in the division, also arguably the 4th.

Khan has always given it a go, done what it takes to have the big fights, challenged himself and I hope he gets a comeback fight, clears his head, puts this behind him, then spanks Brook (and for years, I was not a Khan hater but certainly not a fan)
I think you might be going a bit ott on Khan. For the last 3 years or so he has done sweet fa except sit on his hands and hope for a big fight. Before that, he was very careful about who he fought and every time he's stepped up in class he has been beaten.

He took a risk last night stepping up a weight to fight for a title 2 weights up and deserves credit for that but let's not pretend he's been taking on all comers. He's never rematched and opponent who has beaten him.

I'm not going to stick up for brook though.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

keithmoonhangover wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:Khan needs to take that Brook money then retire, nothing left for him to do.
M.E.N end of the year or early next. Cash out...
Mate, it's got nothing to do with money for Khan. He doesn't need the money.
No, i dont think he needs it but i want him to take it.
Beating Garcia doesnt mean anything significant, he will just hold 1/4 of the world titles.
Brook is a huge "remember when" fight and he also gets to bank a ton of cash.
The time is now...
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:Khan needs to take that Brook money then retire, nothing left for him to do.
M.E.N end of the year or early next. Cash out...
Mate, it's got nothing to do with money for Khan. He doesn't need the money.
No, i dont think he needs it but i want him to take it.
Beating Garcia doesnt mean anything significant, he will just hold 1/4 of the world titles.
Brook is a huge "remember when" fight and he also gets to bank a ton of cash.
The time is now...
If Brook has another name fight lined up I'd tell Khan to bolt but I think it will happen now. Makes sense financially for both guys and Hearn seems to be struggling to get Brook a decent name. I don't know what's going on there.
stocky balboa
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 56
Joined: 25 Jun 2012, 13:24

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by stocky balboa »

brook doesnt deserve a fight with Khan purely cos of his attitude. he fights stiffs and knows Khan is an easier fight for him that the top names as Khan doesnt hit hard and has no chin. he also knows that he will earn retirement money from it. hes had three chances to fight someone with a pulse since winning a debateable decision against porter,his last so called defence was an insult to boxing. no doubt it now makes sense for Khan to do this but I hope he doesnt.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by forcefraser »

I'm not a big khan fan but I really felt for him last night. Stretched out like he was, it was not nice to see.

Brave lad and I hope he recovers from it.
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by magwitch »

Stuarty30 wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Mate, it's got nothing to do with money for Khan. He doesn't need the money.
No, i dont think he needs it but i want him to take it.
Beating Garcia doesnt mean anything significant, he will just hold 1/4 of the world titles.
Brook is a huge "remember when" fight and he also gets to bank a ton of cash.
The time is now...
If Brook has another name fight lined up I'd tell Khan to bolt but I think it will happen now. Makes sense financially for both guys and Hearn seems to be struggling to get Brook a decent name. I don't know what's going on there.
If Khan didn’t get badly knocked out last night, then maybe fight Brook.
I think he’d beat Brook but not sure how that stoppage might affect him.
The thing is, that fight was made on $$$, it was a bad match up boxing wise and it went tits-up.
He got his return....if you can call it worth it....a big bag of cash, so I think he should walk away now after a very creditable career. Forget Brook, he doesn’t need him at all, it’s Brook who needed Khan.
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

how does a Canelo vs. BJS fight end?
lillywhite14
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by lillywhite14 »

wesshaw1985 wrote:how does a Canelo vs. BJS fight end?
Similar to last night. I'd actually be tempted to stick a few quid on Khan to beat BJS at middle.
afcmarshall
Super Welterweight
Posts: 390
Joined: 16 Jul 2015, 14:03

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by afcmarshall »

wesshaw1985 wrote:how does a Canelo vs. BJS fight end?
Was thinking about this especially if Canelo ducks GGG and gets the belt stripped would he go after BJS. I think he could take him the distance
tony1234
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2177
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:02

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by tony1234 »

Only man happy last night was Eddie Hearn, nowhere really to go now for Khan
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

tony1234 wrote:Only man happy last night was Eddie Hearn, nowhere really to go now for Khan
Khan still has plenty of options.
Golovkin or BJS at MW.
Cotto or Liam Smith at LMW.
Garcia, Vargas, Broner, Bradley or Thurman/Porter at WW.
He still holds the power in negotiations with Brook...
keithmoonhangover
Cruiserweight
Posts: 17105
Joined: 16 Sep 2010, 10:42

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by keithmoonhangover »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:Khan needs to take that Brook money then retire, nothing left for him to do.
M.E.N end of the year or early next. Cash out...
Mate, it's got nothing to do with money for Khan. He doesn't need the money.
No, i dont think he needs it but i want him to take it.
Beating Garcia doesnt mean anything significant, he will just hold 1/4 of the world titles.
Brook is a huge "remember when" fight and he also gets to bank a ton of cash.
The time is now...
It means avenging a loss. :OhYes:
TheCobra
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3450
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:11

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by TheCobra »

You could see the doubts creep in during the 5th and 6th. Canelo upped his workrate and Khan slowed slightly and it was game over.

Could hear Virgil in the corner shouting 'you can do it' etc cos you could visibly see Khan losing his way as Canelo was starting to land. As a 'speedster' from 2 weights below Khan should have been miles faster than Canelo for 6 rounds, but it just didn't really pan out like that, it wasn't even one random unlucky punch, Canelo just was fast enough and smart enough to land his punches from 5th round onwards - overall disappointing by Khan to fall so early, I was expecting he'd last until 9-10 when his legs went.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

magwitch wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote: No, i dont think he needs it but i want him to take it.
Beating Garcia doesnt mean anything significant, he will just hold 1/4 of the world titles.
Brook is a huge "remember when" fight and he also gets to bank a ton of cash.
The time is now...
If Brook has another name fight lined up I'd tell Khan to bolt but I think it will happen now. Makes sense financially for both guys and Hearn seems to be struggling to get Brook a decent name. I don't know what's going on there.
If Khan didn’t get badly knocked out last night, then maybe fight Brook.
I think he’d beat Brook but not sure how that stoppage might affect him.
The thing is, that fight was made on $$$, it was a bad match up boxing wise and it went tits-up.
He got his return....if you can call it worth it....a big bag of cash, so I think he should walk away now after a very creditable career. Forget Brook, he doesn’t need him at all, it’s Brook who needed Khan.
I'd agree Brook needs Khan more than the other way around. It's near impossible not to agree. I think Brook would KO Khan though and have done for a long time. I wouldn't be surprised if Khan chose to call it a day. It's hard to see where he goes from here. Greed and pride are both a big driving force so who knows. The way he was talking after the fight last night was he's coming back down to 147 but he might change his mind on reflection.
Sisyphus
Welterweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2016, 09:10

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Sisyphus »

Stuarty30 wrote:The way he was talking after the fight last night was he's coming back down to 147 but he might change his mind on reflection.
Buncey said something about this last night, and he hopes that 'he takes off the extra 25lbs he put on for this fight sensibly'

25lbs :neutral:
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Sisyphus wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:The way he was talking after the fight last night was he's coming back down to 147 but he might change his mind on reflection.
Buncey said something about this last night, and he hopes that 'he takes off the extra 25lbs he put on for this fight sensibly'

25lbs :neutral:
That's a he'll of a lot to lose. I'm struggling to think of a fighter who has successfully dropped that much weight
Sisyphus
Welterweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2016, 09:10

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Sisyphus »

freddydoesdallas wrote:That's a he'll of a lot to lose. I'm struggling to think of a fighter who has successfully dropped that much weight
It also takes Khan down to 130lbs!!
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Stuarty »

freddydoesdallas wrote:
Sisyphus wrote:
Stuarty30 wrote:The way he was talking after the fight last night was he's coming back down to 147 but he might change his mind on reflection.
Buncey said something about this last night, and he hopes that 'he takes off the extra 25lbs he put on for this fight sensibly'

25lbs :neutral:
That's a he'll of a lot to lose. I'm struggling to think of a fighter who has successfully dropped that much weight
That was the beginning of what has been a long ending to RJJ career wasn't it? After he went up to fight Ruiz for the Heavyweight title. Came back down to lightheavy and was a completely different fighter!
BigDoofus
Welterweight
Posts: 2182
Joined: 04 Apr 2016, 14:59

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by BigDoofus »

wesshaw1985 wrote:
tony1234 wrote:Only man happy last night was Eddie Hearn, nowhere really to go now for Khan
Khan still has plenty of options.
Golovkin or BJS at MW.
Cotto or Liam Smith at LMW.
Garcia, Vargas, Broner, Bradley or Thurman/Porter at WW.
He still holds the power in negotiations with Brook...
If Khan keeps getting banged out he will end up brain damaged. Golovkin!! :doh: :doh:
Sisyphus
Welterweight
Posts: 93
Joined: 07 May 2016, 09:10

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by Sisyphus »

Stuarty30 wrote:That was the beginning of what has been a long ending to RJJ career wasn't it? After he went up to fight Ruiz for the Heavyweight title. Came back down to lightheavy and was a completely different fighter!
That has to be the single WORST decision anyone's ever made about their career, after Ruiz he had two (sensible) choices:

1. Retire

2. Cash in on a big money fight defence (I think both Tyson and Holyfield were in negotiated)

But instead :doh:
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: Saul Alvarez (c) vs. Amir Khan - May 7th 2016

Post by wesshaw1985 »

BigDoofus wrote:
wesshaw1985 wrote:
tony1234 wrote:Only man happy last night was Eddie Hearn, nowhere really to go now for Khan
Khan still has plenty of options.
Golovkin or BJS at MW.
Cotto or Liam Smith at LMW.
Garcia, Vargas, Broner, Bradley or Thurman/Porter at WW.
He still holds the power in negotiations with Brook...
If Khan keeps getting banged out he will end up brain damaged. Golovkin!! :doh: :doh:
agreed. But I said it was an "option" I wouldn't recommend it for him...
Post Reply