Jamie Cox wins appeal

Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Stuarty »

bripez wrote:
Talkischeap wrote:Jamie Cox won appeal and has been aquitted of assault
This has been established as being incorrect.

Still guilty but jail sentence suspended for 18 months - does this mean that he cannot box for 18 months (t will be interesting to see how the board apply their rules on this one - they seem to be applied quite strictly when the boxer isn't a "name" with a powerful promoter).

Either way, reading the actual facts (number of calls made and evidence from the operator who took the emergency call etc.) he is clearly not a full shilling.


Moral question of the week : if you went to meet your daughters boyfriend for the first time and saw Cox and Joshua both sat there, who would you be hoping for ? :maybe:
Joshua because he is humble.
CharlesListon
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 888
Joined: 24 May 2010, 16:17

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by CharlesListon »

I'd prefer Fury. I'd know she'd get a nice sandwich.
bripez
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4877
Joined: 11 Feb 2010, 18:07

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by bripez »

CharlesListon wrote:I'd prefer Fury. I'd know she'd get a nice sandwich.
True - Kevin Mitchell would also be happy to feed her (although I don't think it would be a sandwich)
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Counter-puncher »

bripez wrote:

Moral question of the week : if you went to meet your daughters boyfriend for the first time and saw Cox and Joshua both sat there, who would you be hoping for ? :maybe:


Joshua, hes too busy posting pictures of his chicken salad lunches and sixpack on instagram to text anyone 800 times a day
magwitch
Middleweight
Posts: 4753
Joined: 30 Jun 2014, 20:04

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by magwitch »

Counter-puncher wrote:
bripez wrote:

Moral question of the week : if you went to meet your daughters boyfriend for the first time and saw Cox and Joshua both sat there, who would you be hoping for ? :maybe:


Joshua, hes too busy posting pictures of his chicken salad lunches and sixpack on instagram to text anyone 800 times a day
600. Who has time to send 800 texts in a day?! :D
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Surely it can't be that hard for someone to find the official ruling and set the record straight for once and for all?
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Everything I've seen says it's just the sentence that is suspended and that he regrets what he did
watsupdoc87
Super Welterweight
Posts: 2841
Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:16

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by watsupdoc87 »

bripez wrote:
Talkischeap wrote:Jamie Cox won appeal and has been aquitted of assault
This has been established as being incorrect.

Still guilty but jail sentence suspended for 18 months - does this mean that he cannot box for 18 months (t will be interesting to see how the board apply their rules on this one - they seem to be applied quite strictly when the boxer isn't a "name" with a powerful promoter).

Either way, reading the actual facts (number of calls made and evidence from the operator who took the emergency call etc.) he is clearly not a full shilling.


Moral question of the week : if you went to meet your daughters boyfriend for the first time and saw Cox and Joshua both sat there, who would you be hoping for ? :maybe:
so want to answer but dnt wanna get banned again :bag:
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by crusader »

"Cox, who won gold for England at the 2006 Melbourne Olympics"

Okay.......
ShadrachSimmo
Cruiserweight
Posts: 4738
Joined: 20 Oct 2010, 05:42

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ShadrachSimmo »

crusader wrote:"Cox, who won gold for England at the 2006 Melbourne Olympics"

Okay.......
:lol: some in depth journalism there from the western daily press and their finest.
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Still says that his prison sentence is just suspended
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

He did not appeal his convictions for entering with violence, for breaking down the front door, criminal damage, for breaking down her bedroom door, and harassment
.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by crusader »

How was the steak?
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

So as he has still been convicted of the other offences and has had the 26 week jail sentence suspended, after serving a month, does that mean he will be allowed back in the ring in another 22 weeks?
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ste1983 »

freddydoesdallas wrote:So as he has still been convicted of the other offences and has had the 26 week jail sentence suspended, after serving a month, does that mean he will be allowed back in the ring in another 22 weeks?
Board are allowing Frankie Gavin to box whilst on a suspended sentence aren't they?
Nightmare Roy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16938
Joined: 18 May 2003, 17:29

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Nightmare Roy »

Talkischeap wrote:
maverick23 wrote:He won his appeal against his prison sentence. The guilty verdict still stands - he just won't serve any (additional) prison time.

I'd be surprised if the BBBOC let him fight in the next 6 months.
No Jamie was aquitted of assault & the compensation order was quashed also. The other three offences were suspended. The Daily mail got that wrong I've spoken them.The 600 texts a day is what the Russian girl said in the dock just an exaggeration the press decided to print it daft really.
So he's not got a super duper phone contract?
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

ste1983 wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:So as he has still been convicted of the other offences and has had the 26 week jail sentence suspended, after serving a month, does that mean he will be allowed back in the ring in another 22 weeks?
Board are allowing Frankie Gavin to box whilst on a suspended sentence aren't they?
Are they? I thought he was banned until the suspended sentence was up? He's not fought in a long time
Boxerbeetle
Light Heavyweight
Posts: 32968
Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 10:59

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by Boxerbeetle »

Ok, so as I understand it from the article linked to earlier, Cox has been acquitted of common assault and has had his prison sentence suspended, but the convictions for "entering with violence, for breaking down the front door, criminal damage, for breaking down her bedroom door, and harassment" still stand - is that correct?
fighting_irish
Super Welterweight
Posts: 31
Joined: 14 Nov 2014, 18:59

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by fighting_irish »

Just spoke to someone about this close to Cox camp. Original conviction stands just not facing any further charges or prison time related to incident. It is what it is. Original poster that was silly to put up he was aquitted or cleared of all charges when he wasn't.
fighting_irish
Super Welterweight
Posts: 31
Joined: 14 Nov 2014, 18:59

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by fighting_irish »

The assault is the only charge he was cleared on all the rest are suspened and pending
freddydoesdallas
Cruiserweight
Posts: 9436
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 13:48

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by freddydoesdallas »

Talkischeap wrote:
Boxerbeetle wrote:Ok, so as I understand it from the article linked to earlier, Cox has been acquitted of common assault and has had his prison sentence suspended, but the convictions for "entering with violence, for breaking down the front door, criminal damage, for breaking down her bedroom door, and harassment" still stand - is that correct?
Yes they suspended the other charges Jamie only appealed against the assault charge.
They haven't suspended the other charges. They remain as they were as he didn't appeal them.

His sentence is suspended only. He still remains guilty of the other charges hence the suspended sentence
MarkMcBurney
Super Middleweight
Posts: 1670
Joined: 18 Nov 2012, 07:47

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by MarkMcBurney »

Talkischeap wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:
Talkischeap wrote: Yes they suspended the other charges Jamie only appealed against the assault charge.
They haven't suspended the other charges. They remain as they were as he didn't appeal them.

His sentence is suspended only. He still remains guilty of the other
Incorrect I was in court everyday & for the appeal also PA press for Daily mail are doing a rectified updated report Wiltshire news and BBC Wiltshire also. I'll say it again Jamie was aquitted of assault the concurrent sentences of 20 weeks on the unlawful entry & harassment have been suspended for 18 months
I think you two are sort of on the same page.

What Freddy is trying to say is that, you say the concurrent sentences for unlawful entry and harassment have been suspended; this means by default he remains 'guilty' of those charges.

Good news about the assault though, will be interesting to see what the board say about when Jamie can box again.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ste1983 »

fighting_irish wrote:The assault is the only charge he was cleared on all the rest are suspened and pending
charges can't be suspended...sentences can be suspended.

Its pretty obvious that he appealed against the assault charge only and has won that appeal. He remains guilty of the other lesser charges but obviously when the judge originally passed sentence it was taing into account the assault charge as well. Therefore now he's not guilty of assault the sentence has to reflect that and has been readjusted to a suspended sentence for the other offences he is guilty of.
ste1983
Middleweight
Posts: 1762
Joined: 01 Oct 2013, 10:30

Re: Jamie Cox wins appeal

Post by ste1983 »

MarkMcBurney wrote:
Talkischeap wrote:
freddydoesdallas wrote:
They haven't suspended the other charges. They remain as they were as he didn't appeal them.

His sentence is suspended only. He still remains guilty of the other
Incorrect I was in court everyday & for the appeal also PA press for Daily mail are doing a rectified updated report Wiltshire news and BBC Wiltshire also. I'll say it again Jamie was aquitted of assault the concurrent sentences of 20 weeks on the unlawful entry & harassment have been suspended for 18 months
I think you two are sort of on the same page.

What Freddy is trying to say is that, you say the concurrent sentences for unlawful entry and harassment have been suspended; this means by default he remains 'guilty' of those charges.

Good news about the assault though, will be interesting to see what the board say about when Jamie can box again.
Very, I know they are strict when it comes to if a boxer was imprisoned but as per the Gavin case less so if its just a suspended sentence from the out set. In the interests of fairness they should be treating this as a suspended sentence from the off set due to the succesful appeal.
Post Reply