Haskins v Morales RBR

gb · Post by gb » 14 May 2016, 17:51

I've got this 6-2. Too generous to Morales?

rpms · Post by **rpms** » 14 May 2016, 17:52

jameswilson wrote:Haskins's has a dodgy barnet doesn't he.

Council estate haircut

Rexob · Post by **Rexob** » 14 May 2016, 17:52

Looking forward to the Stuart hall blockbuster.

jamesmcdonnell · Post by **jamesmcdonnell** » 14 May 2016, 17:52

Ive lost interest

Neil Gee · Post by **Neil Gee** » 14 May 2016, 17:52

It's going to be Haskins by decision.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 17:53

Morales is terrible.

chad · Post by **chad** » 14 May 2016, 17:53

rd350lc wrote:Morales is a poor shadow of his brother .

So is Haskins

rpms · Post by **rpms** » 14 May 2016, 17:54

Counter-puncher wrote:
rpms wrote:Selby fans probably not sticking around for the main event

They're from Barry, they're probably in a rush to get home and abuse prescription drugs.

I've been to Barry,can't really blame them TBH....

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 14 May 2016, 17:54

Horse wrote:Morales is terrible.

He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.

Rexob · Post by **Rexob** » 14 May 2016, 17:54

Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 17:54

keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.

No, they don't.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 17:55

Rexob wrote:Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.

No, it's not.

Neil Gee · Post by **Neil Gee** » 14 May 2016, 17:55

Yawn.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 14 May 2016, 17:56

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.
No, they don't.

When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 17:57

keithmoonhangover wrote:When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.

Yawn.

Rexob · Post by **Rexob** » 14 May 2016, 17:58

Horse wrote:
Rexob wrote:Well that's not a biased card by Woodhall.
No, it's not.

Eh up who rattled your cage.

rpms · Post by **rpms** » 14 May 2016, 17:58

Its only the fight that Naz v Erik Morales could've been.
Maybe Haskins should have entered the ring on a magic-carpet

gb · Post by gb » 14 May 2016, 17:59

Is Haskins world top 10?

chad · Post by **chad** » 14 May 2016, 18:00

keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:He's in there trying. Anyone that gets in the ring deserves respect.
No, they don't.
When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.

What if they've previously been convicted of rape or kiddy fiddling? Surely there is some exceptions to the rule?

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 14 May 2016, 18:00

Horse wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
Yawn.

Get in the ring Horse. Go and spar with someone. Feel the punches. You'll understand what it's like to be overmatched. You'll understand what it's like to be in the ring with someone that you can't hit cleanly. You'll find out what it's like to be in the ring with someone who punishes you round after round.

In short, come back when you know what the fvck you're talking about.

keithmoonhangover · Post by **keithmoonhangover** » 14 May 2016, 18:01

chad wrote:
keithmoonhangover wrote:
Horse wrote:No, they don't.
When you step through the ropes, you literally put your life on the line. You could die in the ring. Respect to all boxers. If you don't think that, then you should be banned off this forum. You're a disgrace.
What if they've previously been convicted of rape or kiddy fiddling? Surely there is some exceptions to the rule?

No exceptions. They all deserve respect. They are putting their life on the line,

milpool · Post by **milpool** » 14 May 2016, 18:02

This fight is a good example of why having too many world titles is a bad thing. Average world champion against poor challenger in an arena that isn't even half full.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 18:02

keithmoonhangover wrote:Get in the ring Horse. Go and spar with someone. Feel the punches. You'll understand what it's like to be overmatched. You'll understand what it's like to be in the ring with someone that you can't hit cleanly. You'll find out what it's like to be in the ring with someone who punishes you round after round.

In short, come back when you know what the fvck you're talking about.

No.

Rexob · Post by **Rexob** » 14 May 2016, 18:03

Morales has got the Morales nose.

Horse · Post by **Horse** » 14 May 2016, 18:03

milpool wrote:This fight is a good example of why having too many world titles is a bad thing. Average world champion against poor challenger in an arena that isn't even half full.

This should be a non-title fight.

His opponent is a complete chump.

Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR

Re: Haskins v Morales RBR