Parker vs Takam UK time?

[asdfjkl]

Asdfjkl is a little kid. Some other poster that was debating an issue with him, mentioned that there should be age restrictions on our forum insinuating asdfjkl was a minor. Doesn't get the most simplest of things sometimes.

Anyway go Parker!!

Some people don't like it when they realise they are wrong and they they change the subject in bullshit like calling me a little kid. Most of the time, the avarage dog is already more intelligent as such creatures are. No matter how much incest the dog has in his blood.

Oh your posts are that of a 10yr old so that's not changing for me.

You were going for Takam. I was going for Parker, that's the truth. Who won?

I'll give you your credit about it going the distance so well called. That I'm gutted about.

How many fights has Whyte had compared to Takam? Who's the highest ranked EXPERIENCED fighter Whyte has BEATEN? Asking these questions of Whyte cos these ARE the questions that were asked of Parker.

I was perfectly right actually, I said Parker had the odds by about 55/45, but I heard that you would receive 4 times your money back if Takam won. Now Takam didn't win, but it became a close fight, so 4 times your money back for such a close fight is actually a very fair bet to me. Parker KOing Takam sounded like a joke to me, but appearantly not to everybody.
It's like Haye vs Briggs, I'm quite confident Haye will win, to me it's about a 80/20 fight, but I still support Briggs and if I get over 20 times my money back I might even put money on it.

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought, that's why I spotted Tyrone Spong and AJ so fast for example. Whyte has a very good chin, Takam has quite a good chin, they are actually quite similar, but Whyte simply seems bigger, more reach, more determined. I think Whyte has the odds if he fights Takam.

[foxdog1923]

Some people don't like it when they realise they are wrong and they they change the subject in bullshit like calling me a little kid. Most of the time, the avarage dog is already more intelligent as such creatures are. No matter how much incest the dog has in his blood.

Oh your posts are that of a 10yr old so that's not changing for me.

You were going for Takam. I was going for Parker, that's the truth. Who won?

I'll give you your credit about it going the distance so well called. That I'm gutted about.

How many fights has Whyte had compared to Takam? Who's the highest ranked EXPERIENCED fighter Whyte has BEATEN? Asking these questions of Whyte cos these ARE the questions that were asked of Parker.

I was perfectly right actually, I said Parker had the odds by about 55/45, but I heard that you would receive 4 times your money back if Takam won. Now Takam didn't win, but it became a close fight, so 4 times your money back for such a close fight is actually a very fair bet to me. Parker KOing Takam sounded like a joke to me, but appearantly not to everybody.
It's like Haye vs Briggs, I'm quite confident Haye will win, to me it's about a 80/20 fight, but I still support Briggs and if I get over 20 times my money back I might even put money on it.

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought, that's why I spotted Tyrone Spong and AJ so fast for example. Whyte has a very good chin, Takam has quite a good chin, they are actually quite similar, but Whyte simply seems bigger, more reach, more determined. I think Whyte has the odds if he fights Takam.

You were defintely leaning towards Takam. I was saying Parker would win and I WAS RIGHT. My guy won, I won. Like I said before I was wrong about the KO. You were only right about it going the distance.

You say you don't look at names? HAHA LOL what a BIG lie. There's a lot of your old posts asking who has Parker fought? that's clearly asking for the names. What a stupid lie lol. You use to compare the name of Joshua's opponents to Parkers opponents quite a lot. Childish lie.

Takam is quite durable but his chin is not great and neither is Whytes. They both have been knocked out. I'd like to see Takam vs Whyte, it'll be a good fight.

[asdfjkl]

Oh your posts are that of a 10yr old so that's not changing for me.

You were going for Takam. I was going for Parker, that's the truth. Who won?

I'll give you your credit about it going the distance so well called. That I'm gutted about.

How many fights has Whyte had compared to Takam? Who's the highest ranked EXPERIENCED fighter Whyte has BEATEN? Asking these questions of Whyte cos these ARE the questions that were asked of Parker.

I was perfectly right actually, I said Parker had the odds by about 55/45, but I heard that you would receive 4 times your money back if Takam won. Now Takam didn't win, but it became a close fight, so 4 times your money back for such a close fight is actually a very fair bet to me. Parker KOing Takam sounded like a joke to me, but appearantly not to everybody.
It's like Haye vs Briggs, I'm quite confident Haye will win, to me it's about a 80/20 fight, but I still support Briggs and if I get over 20 times my money back I might even put money on it.

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought, that's why I spotted Tyrone Spong and AJ so fast for example. Whyte has a very good chin, Takam has quite a good chin, they are actually quite similar, but Whyte simply seems bigger, more reach, more determined. I think Whyte has the odds if he fights Takam.

You were defintely leaning towards Takam. I was saying Parker would win and I WAS RIGHT. My guy won, I won. Like I said before I was wrong about the KO. You were only right about it going the distance.

You say you don't look at names? HAHA LOL what a BIG lie. There's a lot of your old posts asking who has Parker fought? that's clearly asking for the names. What a stupid lie lol. You use to compare the name of Joshua's opponents to Parkers opponents quite a lot. Childish lie.

Takam is quite durable but his chin is not great and neither is Whytes. They both have been knocked out. I'd like to see Takam vs Whyte, it'll be a good fight.

Go ahead, scroll back in my posts around Parker, or even in my predictions around Parker/Takam, you'll see that what happened was exactly what I predicted and yes, I still think Whyte would beat Parker actually.




Ah, there we go, I didn't even realise it was you:

I expect Parker to win, but not by KO, also, the bookies offer 4 times your money back if Takam wins. Now since it's a 45/55 fight to me, I'd probably still put my money on Takam.

ANTHONY JOSHUA backing Parker to win by KO. So are you down with Joshua? Lol

If Joshua expects Parker to win by KO against Takam, then I disagree with Joshua. Against any opposition with a name it took Parker quite long already, and I see Takam as serious competition, especially compared to Parkers latest few fights before.

If Joshua expects Parker to win by KO against Takam, then I disagree with Joshua. Against any opposition with a name it took Parker quite long already, and I see Takam as serious competition, especially compared to Parkers latest few fights before.

Takam sure is serious competition. He's better than Whyte and Martin so it should be a good knockout for Parker.

I'd love to see Takam Whyte, I think that would be a close match as well indeed, even though I expect Whyte to win it.

I can't make much else of it as saying I was perfectly, perfectly, perfectly right.

[foxdog1923]

I was perfectly right actually, I said Parker had the odds by about 55/45, but I heard that you would receive 4 times your money back if Takam won. Now Takam didn't win, but it became a close fight, so 4 times your money back for such a close fight is actually a very fair bet to me. Parker KOing Takam sounded like a joke to me, but appearantly not to everybody.
It's like Haye vs Briggs, I'm quite confident Haye will win, to me it's about a 80/20 fight, but I still support Briggs and if I get over 20 times my money back I might even put money on it.

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought, that's why I spotted Tyrone Spong and AJ so fast for example. Whyte has a very good chin, Takam has quite a good chin, they are actually quite similar, but Whyte simply seems bigger, more reach, more determined. I think Whyte has the odds if he fights Takam.

You were defintely leaning towards Takam. I was saying Parker would win and I WAS RIGHT. My guy won, I won. Like I said before I was wrong about the KO. You were only right about it going the distance.

You say you don't look at names? HAHA LOL what a BIG lie. There's a lot of your old posts asking who has Parker fought? that's clearly asking for the names. What a stupid lie lol. You use to compare the name of Joshua's opponents to Parkers opponents quite a lot. Childish lie.

Takam is quite durable but his chin is not great and neither is Whytes. They both have been knocked out. I'd like to see Takam vs Whyte, it'll be a good fight.

Go ahead, scroll back in my posts around Parker, or even in my predictions around Parker/Takam, you'll see that what happened was exactly what I predicted and yes, I still think Whyte would beat Parker actually.




Ah, there we go, I didn't even realise it was you:

ANTHONY JOSHUA backing Parker to win by KO. So are you down with Joshua? Lol

If Joshua expects Parker to win by KO against Takam, then I disagree with Joshua. Against any opposition with a name it took Parker quite long already, and I see Takam as serious competition, especially compared to Parkers latest few fights before.

Takam sure is serious competition. He's better than Whyte and Martin so it should be a good knockout for Parker.

I'd love to see Takam Whyte, I think that would be a close match as well indeed, even though I expect Whyte to win it.

I can't make much else of it as saying I was perfectly, perfectly, perfectly right.

Theres nothing there of you saying Parker would win by decision. You said it'll go to the score cards but you never said who'd win. So it's not perfectly right lol. Your probably going to re edit a previous post of yours now with you saying Parker would beat Takam by decision and we both know you'd never say anything like that.

I like how I got you on the names and you don't reply to that HAHA. What nothing to say about your lying? Lol you've been proven to be a liar on here. I have not :)

[asdfjkl]

Theres nothing there of you saying Parker would win by decision. You said it'll go to the score cards but you never said who'd win. So it's not perfectly right lol. Your probably going to re edit a previous post of yours now with you saying Parker would beat Takam by decision and we both know you'd never say anything like that.

I like how I got you on the names and you don't reply to that HAHA. What nothing to say about your lying? Lol you've been proven to be a liar on here. I have not :)

I expect Parker to win, but not by KO, also, the bookies offer 4 times your money back if Takam wins. Now since it's a 45/55 fight to me, I'd probably still put my money on Takam.

ANTHONY JOSHUA backing Parker to win by KO. So are you down with Joshua? Lol

What part do you not understand? And those posts have never been edited at all...
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... m#p4401655


And you probably ment I compared Whyte with Parker, since Whyte KOed all the opponends both Whyte, as well as Parker had, but then loads more fast.

[foxdog1923]

Theres nothing there of you saying Parker would win by decision. You said it'll go to the score cards but you never said who'd win. So it's not perfectly right lol. Your probably going to re edit a previous post of yours now with you saying Parker would beat Takam by decision and we both know you'd never say anything like that.

I like how I got you on the names and you don't reply to that HAHA. What nothing to say about your lying? Lol you've been proven to be a liar on here. I have not :)

I expect Parker to win, but not by KO, also, the bookies offer 4 times your money back if Takam wins. Now since it's a 45/55 fight to me, I'd probably still put my money on Takam.

ANTHONY JOSHUA backing Parker to win by KO. So are you down with Joshua? Lol

What part do you not understand? And those posts have never been edited at all...
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... m#p4401655


And you probably ment I compared Whyte with Parker, since Whyte KOed all the opponends both Whyte, as well as Parker had, but then loads more fast.

I think they've been edited but I'm willing to grant you the benefit of the doubt my son :)

In regards to you saying you don't look at the names you lied. Just admit you lied. You mention names of fighters that Parker fought and you made comparisons. You ALWAYS use Whyte KO'D Minto faster than Parker. Also you use to say Joshua had fought the better names but now you realise that's not the case. That's using names so stop lying lol.

[asdfjkl]

Theres nothing there of you saying Parker would win by decision. You said it'll go to the score cards but you never said who'd win. So it's not perfectly right lol. Your probably going to re edit a previous post of yours now with you saying Parker would beat Takam by decision and we both know you'd never say anything like that.

I like how I got you on the names and you don't reply to that HAHA. What nothing to say about your lying? Lol you've been proven to be a liar on here. I have not :)

ANTHONY JOSHUA backing Parker to win by KO. So are you down with Joshua? Lol

What part do you not understand? And those posts have never been edited at all...
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... m#p4401655


And you probably ment I compared Whyte with Parker, since Whyte KOed all the opponends both Whyte, as well as Parker had, but then loads more fast.

I think they've been edited but I'm willing to grant you the benefit of the doubt my son :)

In regards to you saying you don't look at the names you lied. Just admit you lied. You mention names of fighters that Parker fought and you made comparisons. You ALWAYS use Whyte KO'D Minto faster than Parker. Also you use to say Joshua had fought the better names but now you realise that's not the case. That's using names so stop lying lol.

I don't lie and I admit that I think Whyte would beat Parker.
Look at both of them in the 6th/7th round.
It's not just Minto, it's also Irineu Beato Costa Junior and Marcelo Luiz Nascimento. It took Whyte 6 rounds in totall to KO all of them, it took Parker 6 rounds each on avarage, despite Whyte wasn't looking that good. For me that proves Parker is featherfisted for a heavyweight top contender, he does win all rounds somehow, so it's logic that he can't KO, but can win most rounds against Takam as well. Parker vs Hughie Fury for example would be a lot closer fight as many might expect, if Hughie doesn't have skinproblems I think he got a good chance of winning actually.

[foxdog1923]

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought.

Look at your comment above, the one in bold. You claim here that you don't care about the names a fighter has fought, there is NO denying this with the proof I have provided.

In the past you often make comparisons with Parker and Joshua's past opponents. You would use the NAMES of the BIG NAME fighters to make a point. With Joshua you would say that you felt Joshua had fought the better names and with Whyte you'd say 'Whyte has KO'd so and so (name) in faster time'. You would LOOK AT THE NAMES THEY FOUGHT. That is the truth.

Now look back at your comment above you just got knocked!

[asdfjkl]

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought.

Look at your comment above, the one in bold. You claim here that you don't care about the names a fighter has fought, there is NO denying this with the proof I have provided.

In the past you often make comparisons with Parker and Joshua's past opponents. You would use the NAMES of the BIG NAME fighters to make a point. With Joshua you would say that you felt Joshua had fought the better names and with Whyte you'd say 'Whyte has KO'd so and so (name) in faster time'. You would LOOK AT THE NAMES THEY FOUGHT. That is the truth.

Now look back at your comment above you just got knocked!

But it's the skills both showed against those opponends, where you're looking at right?
Look at Glazkov vs Martin, Martin didn't show a thing, but he did win against a big name, so I consider Martin to be quite an avarage boxer, because I looked at the skills. If I look at the name, KOing Glazkov in 3 rounds, that's quite a hard task, so then I would consider Martin to be a top contender, which I don't.

If you proof your skills to be far superior against the same opponend that says a lot yes, doesn't mean I'm looking at the names, I still look at the skills. If you still think that proves that I'm looking at the name they fought, then go ahead buy yourself a cake and celebrate it.

IMO, I think you got knocked a hell of a lot harder with quoting both of us just a few posts back, but then you allways got those weak excuses, like saying you got the benefit of the doubt and bullshit like that.

To me you sound like David Haye saying his toe hurts.

[foxdog1923]

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought.

Look at your comment above, the one in bold. You claim here that you don't care about the names a fighter has fought, there is NO denying this with the proof I have provided.

In the past you often make comparisons with Parker and Joshua's past opponents. You would use the NAMES of the BIG NAME fighters to make a point. With Joshua you would say that you felt Joshua had fought the better names and with Whyte you'd say 'Whyte has KO'd so and so (name) in faster time'. You would LOOK AT THE NAMES THEY FOUGHT. That is the truth.

Now look back at your comment above you just got knocked!

But it's the skills both showed against those opponends, where you're looking at right?
Look at Glazkov vs Martin, Martin didn't show a thing, but he did win against a big name, so I consider Martin to be quite an avarage boxer, because I looked at the skills. If I look at the name, KOing Glazkov in 3 rounds, that's quite a hard task, so then I would consider Martin to be a top contender, which I don't.

If you proof your skills to be far superior against the same opponend that says a lot yes, doesn't mean I'm looking at the names, I still look at the skills. If you still think that proves that I'm looking at the name they fought, then go ahead buy yourself a cake and celebrate it.

IMO, I think you got knocked a hell of a lot harder with quoting both of us just a few posts back, but then you allways got those weak excuses, like saying you got the benefit of the doubt and bullshit like that.

To me you sound like David Haye saying his toe hurts.

See I knew you'd duck the subject. I'm so happy though cos that makes you look defeated which you are as I exposed you as a liar.

Haha "you don't use names" haha. Maybe I should mention that every time you make comparisons cos I know you ALWAYS use names, it's the only way you make comparisons. I'll get you every time :)

You should just admit you lied. Even though everyone can see it lol.

[foxdog1923]

If I look at a fight I look at the skills, not at the names they fought.

Look at your comment above, the one in bold. You claim here that you don't care about the names a fighter has fought, there is NO denying this with the proof I have provided.

In the past you often make comparisons with Parker and Joshua's past opponents. You would use the NAMES of the BIG NAME fighters to make a point. With Joshua you would say that you felt Joshua had fought the better names and with Whyte you'd say 'Whyte has KO'd so and so (name) in faster time'. You would LOOK AT THE NAMES THEY FOUGHT. That is the truth.

Now look back at your comment above you just got knocked!

asdfjkl is a PROVEN liar. Go me, I'm the winner, go me!

[ClivePatrickLyons]

Great heavyweight action that round - whys this not a PPV ? !!

Here in Australia it cost me over 30 buck's it was a good fight and it was worth it I love watching something when I don't know what is going to happen Parker showed he can handle a legit World rated fighter he is now number 1 contender by the WBO and BY the IBF

[johnswan1]

TBH I'm impressed by Parker, I expected and predicted just about this to happen.
I knew 4 times your money back if Takam wins was a very nice risk/reward.
I already said it was a 55/45 fight with Parker having the odds, I secretly hoped Takam to win, not because I have anything against Parker, but because I would have loved it to see the bookies losing.

A win for Takam would be a good result for the bookies you nitwit. Bookies make their money from favourites losing.

[foxdog1923]

TBH I'm impressed by Parker, I expected and predicted just about this to happen.
I knew 4 times your money back if Takam wins was a very nice risk/reward.
I already said it was a 55/45 fight with Parker having the odds, I secretly hoped Takam to win, not because I have anything against Parker, but because I would have loved it to see the bookies losing.

A win for Takam would be a good result for the bookies you nitwit. Bookies make their money from favourites losing.

He doesn't seem to understand that. Asdfjkl is a little kid.

[asdfjkl]

TBH I'm impressed by Parker, I expected and predicted just about this to happen.
I knew 4 times your money back if Takam wins was a very nice risk/reward.
I already said it was a 55/45 fight with Parker having the odds, I secretly hoped Takam to win, not because I have anything against Parker, but because I would have loved it to see the bookies losing.

A win for Takam would be a good result for the bookies you nitwit. Bookies make their money from favourites losing.

He doesn't seem to understand that. Asdfjkl is a little kid.

Both of you are the nitwits, you just have to understand you can also put money on Takam if you think the odds are fair.