No no, that's right, thats EXACTLY what I was saying. Fighters like Hagler, Hopkins, Mayweather have the CAPACITY for hard work, and as you say that is a genetic gift as much as speed, power etc.Terence wrote:Terence wrote:I think Hagler was very gifted; graft and dedication is as much a gift as the flashy flurrying the likes of Nunn show. How many styles could Hagler mix-up? Plus look at his contender fights versus the likes of Seales and Briscoe, he could do the lot and IMO became champ beyond his best years. Smart, strong, intelligent and a grafter. That is gifted.
In terms of skills you have to say James Toney and Riddick Bowe. Bowe was particularly gifted but lacked the other attributes required.
On a seperate note how about the least gifted fighters to become Champs? The guys who slogged it out and made the most of what they had. I don't think Hopknis was hugely gifted but credit to him, he made the most of what tools he had for a long time.James I hate to be an arse here but I think you think gift = giving = father christmas.jamesmcdonnell wrote:Surely by definition, a gift is something you DON'T have to work for?Gift means endowement or capacity and Hagler had an amazing CAPACITY for hard work. One of the greatest gifts a boxer can have. Talent is seen as a gift but I think of it as a craft, Hagler being the greatest craftsman of all time. It also stems from dowry and brides don't work for their dowry, unless you count spending the wedding night on her back!
When people say 'Tyson could have been the best, he threw it all away' or 'what a waste of talent George best was.' They miss the point, that is what those men were, they were cursed with the wrong genes/backgrounds, and they were almost fated to fornicate up. Had Tyson had the work ethic of Hagler and the mental toughness to go with it, he'd probably have retired undefeated at the age of 35. Sadly for him, he didn't, and he had an impressive run before he was punctured by Douglas, and by his own admission was never the same fighter.