asdfjkl wrote:jezzamundo wrote:asdfjkl wrote:
Wow and that while he actually met the ground himself in that match. Against a guy he couldn't get down but met the ground every two rounds his match after?! I think Scott isn't even top 3 of the US
Yep, although I'd probably have Scott as the third best American heavyweight after Wilder and Jennings. The thread where he is voted in is here:
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... n#p4275165
Scott went down, but he won clearly on the scorecards over Thompson (who was ranked #9 at the time and coming off a stoppage win over Solis and a competitive loss to Pulev), which the majority (myself included) saw as being deserving of a rank. Scott needs to fight again soon, though, or he will see himself being pushed out of the rankings through inactivity.
Ah, now I see, most people never wanted him in the list I see, but you got odd methods of calculating I understood.
Let's check the votes:
7 9 9 11 12 13 13 100 100 100 100 100
100 is not in top 15.
That makes 13 in the middle right? Somehow you make a 12 of it for something I don't understand but ok.
Based on the numbers you've posted, most people who voted did want him ranked, by a vote of 7 to 5. I'm not sure where you got the other two 'unraked' votes from as there are only three - so actually the majority wanted Scott ranked by a vote of 7 to 3. The median is 12.5, hence the =12 rank. Based on the new rules, the existing fighter is placed higher, so Scott would go to #13 in this case.
7, 9, 9, 11, 12, 13, 13, U, U, U.
