fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by JimJim2009 »

It is beyond a joke now, with 42 year old fana facing terry next month. Nobody in the uk is importing more inept world title challengers than fwank - look at the nobody Liam smith faces this weekend, and the guy lined up for BJS before that fight got scrapped. Somebody close to fwank needs to have a word, as world title challengers these guys aren't just bad they are awful. It's almost like he wants to make his channel more obscure and widen the gap with matchroom even further. He bangs on about making the fights the fans want to see but what he delivers for his world champs is a joke.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Horse »

I agree.
Black Sam Bellamy
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 1476
Joined: 25 Sep 2008, 13:51

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Black Sam Bellamy »

No mainstream cross-over exposure means no ticket sales means no money in the pot for quality opponents.
Stuarty
Middleweight
Posts: 27293
Joined: 20 Aug 2014, 10:28

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Stuarty »

Fana? Seriously? Ffs! I didn't even realise he was still going. Frank has been the same for years. Some of Calzaghes defences years ago were a piss take as well.
Old bones Ian
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 11808
Joined: 13 Jul 2004, 07:33

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Old bones Ian »

Fana is something like 4-4 as a lightweight, no way should he be fighting for a world title again. Why do fans buy tickets to this?
wesshaw1985
Super Middleweight
Posts: 7483
Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 17:57

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by wesshaw1985 »

does W@rren have a match maker or does he do it all himself?

BJS vs. Bursak
Smith vs. Radosevic
Flanagan vs. Fana
pointless, no hype, no eyeballs.

3 things - get English-speaking opponents to build a little hype and/or get fighters coming off competitive fights on sky sports and/or get old named opponents.

alternative opponents for what I'm guessing would be comparative money -
BJS vs. Jorge Heiland (beat Macklin on Sky TV)
Smith vs. Carson Jones (beat Brian Rose on Sky TV)
Flanagan vs. Yvan Mendy (beat Luke Campbell on a Sky PPV)
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13439
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by jameswilson »

He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.
Counter-puncher
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 39141
Joined: 20 May 2008, 11:41

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Counter-puncher »

jameswilson wrote:He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.
You can't buy that kind of experience
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by ElJefe »

jameswilson wrote:He's tough. He's game. He'll come to win.
He's not just tough, mate. He's African remember. That automatically puts him in the "teak tough" group of British commentator/pundit clichés.
CMDY
Super Welterweight
Posts: 332
Joined: 03 Apr 2015, 12:26

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by CMDY »

wesshaw1985 wrote:does W@rren have a match maker or does he do it all himself?

BJS vs. Bursak
Smith vs. Radosevic
Flanagan vs. Fana
pointless, no hype, no eyeballs.

3 things - get English-speaking opponents to build a little hype and/or get fighters coming off competitive fights on sky sports and/or get old named opponents.

alternative opponents for what I'm guessing would be comparative money -
BJS vs. Jorge Heiland (beat Macklin on Sky TV)
Smith vs. Carson Jones (beat Brian Rose on Sky TV)
Flanagan vs. Yvan Mendy (beat Luke Campbell on a Sky PPV)
Good calls.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by JimJim2009 »

Black Sam Bellamy wrote:No mainstream cross-over exposure means no ticket sales means no money in the pot for quality opponents.
Agreed, but it's a dangerous downward spiral of quality and it's a bit sad to see a former top promoter putting on a world title fight involving fana in 2016. No doubt fwank will soon pop up on ifilm slagging off matchroom and putting the boot in on Joshua's opponent.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Autobarn »

I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...
bfchunk
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 884
Joined: 28 Sep 2009, 15:39

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by bfchunk »

Image
Image
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by JimJim2009 »

Not sure how long the current deal lasts but I bet terry is wishing he was a matchroom fighter.
handsofstone
Cruiserweight
Posts: 23228
Joined: 11 Jan 2011, 17:28

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by handsofstone »

Couldnt Fwank have brought over Andreas Evensen? Surely he's a LW these days
Stevieb8006
Heavyweight
Heavyweight

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Stevieb8006 »

bfchunk wrote:Image
Image
Enzo used to have a fair pair of tits on him, but he seems to have lost them as he's got older. In stark contrast to myself.
keirw
Middleweight
Posts: 2681
Joined: 03 Nov 2013, 10:55

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by keirw »

I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.
black panther
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 4097
Joined: 11 Dec 2003, 07:06

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by black panther »

Autobarn wrote:I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...
Good post. To add even more emphasis to your point, it was in 2005 (eleven years ago) that Fana was destroyed by a past it Barrera.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Autobarn »

Is that Calzaghe-Pudwill and Maccarinelli-Lamontagne?
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Autobarn »

black panther wrote:
Autobarn wrote:I thought they reserved "teak tough" for Ghanaians.

Yeah this is very bad. I couldn't watch most of FW's challengers for Calzaghe, Maccarinelli, Hatton (WBU), Gary Lockett (WBU) back when I spent a lot of money on Sky Sports.

Fana was destroyed some 7 years ago by Barrera down at super feather, in only a couple of rounds.

Meanwhile Crolla is coming off destructions of Barroso, Perez and could be heading toward unification with Linares...
Good post. To add even more emphasis to your point, it was in 2005 (eleven years ago) that Fana was destroyed by a past it Barrera.
I think Barrera still had something. But it was the last gasp of his career.

11 years since Fana was brutally exposed, wow.
JimJim2009
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 3131
Joined: 10 Nov 2008, 09:48

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by JimJim2009 »

keirw wrote:I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.
Good point. I would class fana as barely acceptable for an inter continental title fight, given his advanced years. To put him in with Flanaghan is inexcusable. Standards have declined in recent years but Jesus Christ this is a new low. Has there ever been a lightweight title challenger in his 40's ? Fana turns 43 soon after the fight. I would like to see kugan ask a few blunt questions of fwank, next time he is harping on about how old Shannon Briggs is or how crap the opposition is for kell and Joshua.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by Autobarn »

keirw wrote:I'm racking my brains a bit trying to remember the last time a British world title holder had a genuinely dangerous voluntary defence.

The only ones I can think of off the top of my head are Burns vs Beltran and Cleverly vs Kovalev and they were both a couple years ago.

Obviously Fury vs Klitchsko is coming up too, but they seem to be few and far between.
Naz, Lennox and Froch would have several consecutive hard fights vs dangerous fighters.

Froch v Taylor was a good voluntary. Froch demanded the fight of his top contender and was ridiculed for calling out the better known fighter. Froch's last ditch rally was one of my absolute favourite boxing moments.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by crusader »

Wasn't Taylor Froch's mandatory?
jameswilson
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 13439
Joined: 08 Jan 2004, 18:01

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by jameswilson »

crusader wrote:Wasn't Taylor Froch's mandatory?
Yes I'm sure I vividly remember the WBC at the time adding a rule that meant winners of vacant titles had to fight 2 consecutive mandatories.
CaptainSpacerod
Welterweight
Posts: 3381
Joined: 15 Dec 2015, 03:21

Re: fwanks ridiculous world title challengers

Post by CaptainSpacerod »

Autobarn wrote: Froch's last ditch rally was one of my absolute favourite boxing moments.
Fantastic never to be forgotten finish. I was leaping round the living room like a madman.
Post Reply