UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by ElJefe »

Horse wrote:
ElJefe wrote:Light Middleweight:
1. Lara
2. Charlo
3. Smith
No way is Smith No. 3.

He's a complete joke of a champion.

He doesn't even deserve a top 10 spot.
Admittedly biased towards him as I like him as a fighter, on second thought I would have had Andrade ahead of him and possibly Trout, but I can't think of 5 on top of that. Jermell, Martirosyan, Bundradge? Hardly a stacked division.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Horse »

ElJefe wrote:Admittedly biased towards him as I like him as a fighter, on second thought I would have had Andrade ahead of him and possibly Trout, but I can't think of 5 on top of that. Jermell, Martirosyan, Bundradge? Hardly a stacked division.
It's a weak division, but Smith still doesn't deserve to be anywhere near the top.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by ElJefe »

Horse wrote:
ElJefe wrote:Admittedly biased towards him as I like him as a fighter, on second thought I would have had Andrade ahead of him and possibly Trout, but I can't think of 5 on top of that. Jermell, Martirosyan, Bundradge? Hardly a stacked division.
It's a weak division, but Smith still doesn't deserve to be anywhere near the top.
I don't think anyone in the division has a very good resume though, so I end up leaning towards ranking it on who I think is better. I think Smith beats Jermell, Martirosyan etc and I can't even think of any more 154lbers to be honest, it's a shallow division.
forcefraser
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 5462
Joined: 17 Jun 2008, 06:15

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by forcefraser »

Come on boys, Fast Car told us that Crolla was "Nammmma wan lightweight in de wooowd" Surely he´s not telling us porkies?
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by crusader »

I have Smith 9th at 154

Head to head I'd take Lara, both Charlos, Trout, Andrade, Vanes, and probably Williams over him. Soro would be 50/50 ish.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by ElJefe »

I thought Soro was at middleweight these days? I'll admit I haven't seen anything of Williams.
crusader
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16875
Joined: 19 Jan 2009, 20:14

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by crusader »

Wasn't he going to fight Smith for the vacant title before promotional issues got in the way? He would've been Liam's best opponent by far, so it's a shame it ended up being Smith-Thompson.
ElJefe
Middleweight
Posts: 2545
Joined: 22 Apr 2014, 13:13

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by ElJefe »

I remember it being mentioned but I thought he chose to stay at 160 when it didn't happen. Just checked and his last fight was for the EBU at middleweight but that was over a year ago, not sure what he's up to now. Soro vs Smith for the vacant title would have been a much better fight than Thompson.
Autobarn
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 16093
Joined: 05 Jul 2005, 13:01

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Autobarn »

Tarkus wrote:Fury is the only number one, but his status is very shaky. He has not yet won the rematch. He has not yet have a defense. He has not yet defeated other top men in the division. Apart from Klitschko win Furys CV is pretty weak.

DeGale is close but I cant call him number one. He could have lead the division by now but where are the unification fights? Now young guns are coming up and his status is getting even less assured.

I think having 13 belt holders and 1 (weak) champion means that UK has mediocre talent but fighters have been able to maximize their potential in recent years. Lot of credit must be given to promoters for been able to get title shots for their less then stellar clients. Especially forum favorite Eddie, 8 out of 13 are his men.
Less than stellar clients and mediocre talent?

Like Olympic gold medalists Joshua and Degale?

Or pros who learned the trade in the hard 12 round fights like McDonnell and Crolla to win fierce fights vs international opposition?

Some fighters like Burns and Bellew have benefited fighting for titles when the champion is unable to defend. Their promoter is pretty sharp and able to sneak them in. But others like Fury, McDonnell (in two consecutive fights) and Brook beat champions - away from home to boot.

A number of big fights are in the making, such as Brook v Vargas, Fury v Klitschko 2, Crolla v Linares, Degale v Jack...Fights such as these can take us closer to the answers.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by BitPlayer »

Wales wrote:If you beat the man you are the man. In that sense he's #1.

However, Wlad had become the man by unifying and beating all comers over a 10 year period. Wlad had hit 40 and He'd only fought once in 23 months, an uninspiring points win over Bryant Jennings who'd got the fight after a SD win over Mike Perez ffs.

Like I said, on paper Fury is #1, but I'm not sure he's the best.

Also using the "to be the man beat the man" theory, what happens if Fury beats Wlad then 3 low level guys for argument sake Chisora Whyte and Adamek but Joshua goes on a 5 fight KO winning streak beating Brazeale Parker Wilder Povetkin Ortiz ? Is fury still #1?
If that happened maybe you'd have an argument, but it hasn't and won't so you don't. Also Fury has shown he can win at a level none of his rivals have, Wilder and Povetkin have a good number of wins, but against tier 2 opposition, (Povetkin also has a loss) Pulev has one win of note since losing to Wlad, and generally not as strong wins, Ortiz has two wins worth talking about, Parker has one, Joshua has none, and Breazeale is terrible.
Last edited by BitPlayer on 01 Jun 2016, 18:00, edited 1 time in total.
BitPlayer
Welterweight
Posts: 3527
Joined: 29 Feb 2016, 05:14

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by BitPlayer »

Tarkus wrote:Fury is the only number one, but his status is very shaky. He has not yet won the rematch. He has not yet have a defense. He has not yet defeated other top men in the division. Apart from Klitschko win Furys CV is pretty weak.

DeGale is close but I cant call him number one. He could have lead the division by now but where are the unification fights? Now young guns are coming up and his status is getting even less assured.

I think having 13 belt holders and 1 (weak) champion means that UK has mediocre talent but fighters have been able to maximize their potential in recent years. Lot of credit must be given to promoters for been able to get title shots for their less then stellar clients. Especially forum favorite Eddie, 8 out of 13 are his men.
Weak as in third best in the division? Because h was No.3 on Boxrec whose rankings are literally a measure of how strong your CV is.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Tarkus »

BitPlayer wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Fury is the only number one, but his status is very shaky. He has not yet won the rematch. He has not yet have a defense. He has not yet defeated other top men in the division. Apart from Klitschko win Furys CV is pretty weak.

DeGale is close but I cant call him number one. He could have lead the division by now but where are the unification fights? Now young guns are coming up and his status is getting even less assured.

I think having 13 belt holders and 1 (weak) champion means that UK has mediocre talent but fighters have been able to maximize their potential in recent years. Lot of credit must be given to promoters for been able to get title shots for their less then stellar clients. Especially forum favorite Eddie, 8 out of 13 are his men.
Weak as in third best in the division? Because h was No.3 on Boxrec whose rankings are literally a measure of how strong your CV is.
So? All top heavy weights avoid each other not just Fury, they all have weak CVs, well except of Povetkin perhaps. However they all are either contenders or paper champs. Wheres Fury is the real champ. And for the real champ his resume is very weak.
Tarkus
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2859
Joined: 04 Jul 2010, 08:50

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Tarkus »

Autobarn wrote:
Tarkus wrote:Fury is the only number one, but his status is very shaky. He has not yet won the rematch. He has not yet have a defense. He has not yet defeated other top men in the division. Apart from Klitschko win Furys CV is pretty weak.

DeGale is close but I cant call him number one. He could have lead the division by now but where are the unification fights? Now young guns are coming up and his status is getting even less assured.

I think having 13 belt holders and 1 (weak) champion means that UK has mediocre talent but fighters have been able to maximize their potential in recent years. Lot of credit must be given to promoters for been able to get title shots for their less then stellar clients. Especially forum favorite Eddie, 8 out of 13 are his men.
Less than stellar clients and mediocre talent?

Like Olympic gold medalists Joshua and Degale?

Or pros who learned the trade in the hard 12 round fights like McDonnell and Crolla to win fierce fights vs international opposition?

Some fighters like Burns and Bellew have benefited fighting for titles when the champion is unable to defend. Their promoter is pretty sharp and able to sneak them in. But others like Fury, McDonnell (in two consecutive fights) and Brook beat champions - away from home to boot.

A number of big fights are in the making, such as Brook v Vargas, Fury v Klitschko 2, Crolla v Linares, Degale v Jack...Fights such as these can take us closer to the answers.
Brook, Frampton, DeGale, Fury, Joshua, Selby are all talented. Plus few fighters which dont have titles. They all have chance to become number one. The most of the rest are just belt holders that have already maxed out. Overall I think this is a strong generation of UK boxers.
PredatorHayds
Super Welterweight
Posts: 4891
Joined: 08 Jul 2015, 08:23

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by PredatorHayds »

Soro had promoter problems which have finally been resolved.
He was due to fight at light-middle but got injured. He'd be one id say is top 10 light middle if he chooses to stay in the division.
SamWise72
Cruiserweight
Posts: 1346
Joined: 02 Jul 2011, 16:41

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by SamWise72 »

I think the point with Fury is that he's undoubtedly number 1, but almost certainly not the best. Maybe not even in the top 5. Sooner or later, if he doesn't retire, he'll have to fight Ortiz, or AJ, or Wilder or even Pulev, and at that point, a lot of people think he'll be exposed. None of this stops him being the number 1.
brilo33
Middleweight
Posts: 7865
Joined: 07 Mar 2014, 16:05

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by brilo33 »

fury and degale are real champions of there weight no doubt.good post as some one who moans about titles shut me up
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Horse »

SamWise72 wrote:I think the point with Fury is that he's undoubtedly number 1, but almost certainly not the best. Maybe not even in the top 5. Sooner or later, if he doesn't retire, he'll have to fight Ortiz, or AJ, or Wilder or even Pulev, and at that point, a lot of people think he'll be exposed. None of this stops him being the number 1.
Terrible post.
Manchester Massive
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 371
Joined: 29 May 2008, 18:34

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Manchester Massive »

SamWise72 wrote:I think the point with Fury is that he's undoubtedly number 1, but almost certainly not the best. Maybe not even in the top 5. Sooner or later, if he doesn't retire, he'll have to fight Ortiz, or AJ, or Wilder or even Pulev, and at that point, a lot of people think he'll be exposed. None of this stops him being the number 1.
How do you think Pulev or Wilder would fare if they were fighting Wlad next?
ClivePatrickLyons
Middleweight
Posts: 2811
Joined: 07 Aug 2014, 22:10

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by ClivePatrickLyons »

Wales wrote:UK now has 13 world champions. But how many fighters do we have who are truly #1 in their division though?

Can make a case for De Gale at SMW.
Fury on paper at HW cos he beat the man, but I don't think he's #1, really?

Is that it? 1 maybe 2 from 13

I bet some of them 13 are WBA Champs you know the WBA how they have 3 Champion's in every weight class the REAL Champ IS THE ONE WITH THE WORD SUPER in it The only one of your 13 World :maybe: Champ's that's number 1 is Tyson Fury.
Wales
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 7854
Joined: 23 Mar 2004, 14:05

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Wales »

danamba7 wrote:I swear we are the only nation to be able to somehow turn such a positive into a bit of a negative. Fury may be the only proven number 1 but AJ, Degale, Brook, McDonnell, Frampton Crolla/Flanagan could prove to be. Ideally there wouldn't be this many belts of course but let's enjoy this success.
Didn't mean it to be negative mate. Great thing about having UK fighters holding "world titles" (whether they're #1 or not) is it increases the chances of big fights, even unification fights.simple example Would Lebedev Makabu (had he won) even get UK coverage? Probably not. Lebedev Bellew however...
tigermoth87
Welterweight
Posts: 1799
Joined: 21 Feb 2016, 11:23

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by tigermoth87 »

Fury and Degale

I'd fancy Flanagan, Crolla and McDonnell to be in with a chance against the other champs in their divisions too but can't flat out say they are the best until they face them.
tobyh5
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 2880
Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 07:07

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by tobyh5 »

Wales wrote:
However, Wlad had become the man by unifying and beating all comers over a 10 year period. Wlad had hit 40 and He'd only fought once in 23 months, an uninspiring points win over Bryant Jennings who'd got the fight after a SD win over Mike Perez ffs.
A specialist boxing forum and two pages later no one has noticed or picked up on this totally inaccuracy?
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47082
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by gilgamesh »

Horse wrote:
Wales wrote:Fury on paper at HW cos he beat the man, but I don't think he's #1, really?
:roll:
He's not wrong Horse. There's at least 5 dudes at Heavyweight that could kick his ass.
gilgamesh
Cruiserweight
Posts: 47082
Joined: 02 Sep 2010, 16:21

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by gilgamesh »

For what it's worth. Carl Frampton with his win over Scott Quigg already this year, and the Leo Santa Cruz fight coming up soon. If he beats Santa Cruz I think he'd be the frontrunner for Fighter of the Year this year.
Horse
Heavyweight
Heavyweight
Posts: 22335
Joined: 03 Jul 2005, 17:09

Re: UK has 13 world champions but how many are #1?

Post by Horse »

gilgamesh wrote:He's not wrong Horse. There's at least 5 dudes at Heavyweight that could kick his ass.
I might have to quit this forum.

What a rotten post.
Post Reply