Take it off him and give it to Povetkin? There's no way that stupidity would eventuate despite that stupidity already shown in the handling of this drug testing scenario.asdfjkl wrote: I don't understand why the WBC doesn't take the belt away from him.
Even Ryabinskiy is not as categorical as you. If a concentration of a banned substance is above a margin of error, then the result is positive. In Povetkin's case, it is 15 times below 1 microgram which is an amount causing automatic sanctions, but there is no "allowed amount" after March 1st. Amounts under 1 microgram cause additional investigation which is exactly what has been done.asdfjkl wrote:boxing_rocks wrote:I am not an American, and I may know more about science than you, so I will ask again:asdfjkl wrote:Up to what point can you blame someone for being stupit? If you take a look at youtube, my god those Americans are dumb. They understand absolutely nothing about science, they are too retarded to understand that Povetkin was clean all the time, no matter how clear the evidence is. Even if you translate it to dumb people language instead of numbers. Anyone with a brain can understand them but they still don't. I can fully understand some type of race that's now considered as people were seen as monkeys back in the days. They act like they only understand what they want to hear and continue to deny reality and science. How can you keep on sticking your head in Wilders but after all this bullshit? Well they prove they can.
May I ask how the negative test in May clears the positive (even though at very low level) result in April ? Yes, a level of meldonium in Povetkin's body now is below a detectable level, but it only proves that he didn't take it after the previous test and his body has been cleared of it. Isn't a point of random testing to not let cheaters (I am NOT saying that Povetkin is one) to clear their body by an expected test date ?
What would benefit Povetkin much more is some expert confirming that his previous level was in fact 70 nanogram, and that is a very close to a detectable level, so negative tests at the beginning of April could easily be false negatives, and the positive test could be a result of lower hydration. That would be in a line with a theory that Povetkin didn't take meldonium after the ban.
All test were negative, including the tests in the end of april. There is just found evidence of things we already knew, that's all. I'm not sure why American testers think that it's now proven Povetkin was clean all the time, by checking his old samples they would have known all numbers added up all the time. Wilder got what he wants, even more delay, that's the worst thing of all. I don't understand why the WBC doesn't take the belt away from him.
When they spell stupid wrong, for starters......asdfjkl wrote:Up to what point can you blame someone for being stupit? If you take a look at youtube, my god those Americans are dumb. They understand absolutely nothing about science, they are too retarded to understand that Povetkin was clean all the time, no matter how clear the evidence is. Even if you translate it to dumb people language instead of numbers. Anyone with a brain can understand them but they still don't. I can fully understand some type of race that's now considered as people were seen as monkeys back in the days. They act like they only understand what they want to hear and continue to deny reality and science. How can you keep on sticking your head in Wilders but after all this bullshit? Well they prove they can.
armageto wrote:When they spell stupid wrong, for starters......asdfjkl wrote:Up to what point can you blame someone for being stupit? If you take a look at youtube, my god those Americans are dumb. They understand absolutely nothing about science, they are too retarded to understand that Povetkin was clean all the time, no matter how clear the evidence is. Even if you translate it to dumb people language instead of numbers. Anyone with a brain can understand them but they still don't. I can fully understand some type of race that's now considered as people were seen as monkeys back in the days. They act like they only understand what they want to hear and continue to deny reality and science. How can you keep on sticking your head in Wilders but after all this bullshit? Well they prove they can.
so good.If Fury had that it would have been taken away ages ago. And yup, as explained, it's translated to dumb people language.foxdog1923 wrote:Take it off him and give it to Povetkin? There's no way that stupidity would eventuate despite that stupidity already shown in the handling of this drug testing scenario.asdfjkl wrote: I don't understand why the WBC doesn't take the belt away from him.
We want to see the fight. Povetkin should receive the belt the right way when he beats Wilder in their upcoming bout. Question is, how longer must we wait? Also will Wilder take up another fighter to fight next or will he set up for Povetkin?
Post it in your native tongue instead. Google is pretty good at translating goat-herding language to the Queen's English.asdfjkl wrote:If Fury had that it would have been taken away ages ago. And yup, as explained, it's translated to dumb people language.foxdog1923 wrote:Take it off him and give it to Povetkin? There's no way that stupidity would eventuate despite that stupidity already shown in the handling of this drug testing scenario.asdfjkl wrote: I don't understand why the WBC doesn't take the belt away from him.
We want to see the fight. Povetkin should receive the belt the right way when he beats Wilder in their upcoming bout. Question is, how longer must we wait? Also will Wilder take up another fighter to fight next or will he set up for Povetkin?
Lol yeah asdfjkl sets himself up to look stupid a lot.MarkMcBurney wrote:Post it in your native tongue instead. Google is pretty good at translating goat-herding language to the Queen's English.asdfjkl wrote:If Fury had that it would have been taken away ages ago. And yup, as explained, it's translated to dumb people language.foxdog1923 wrote: Take it off him and give it to Povetkin? There's no way that stupidity would eventuate despite that stupidity already shown in the handling of this drug testing scenario.
We want to see the fight. Povetkin should receive the belt the right way when he beats Wilder in their upcoming bout. Question is, how longer must we wait? Also will Wilder take up another fighter to fight next or will he set up for Povetkin?
Not when it comes to Dutch lol.MarkMcBurney wrote:Post it in your native tongue instead. Google is pretty good at translating goat-herding language to the Queen's English.asdfjkl wrote:If Fury had that it would have been taken away ages ago. And yup, as explained, it's translated to dumb people language.foxdog1923 wrote: Take it off him and give it to Povetkin? There's no way that stupidity would eventuate despite that stupidity already shown in the handling of this drug testing scenario.
We want to see the fight. Povetkin should receive the belt the right way when he beats Wilder in their upcoming bout. Question is, how longer must we wait? Also will Wilder take up another fighter to fight next or will he set up for Povetkin?
Ahhhh, that explains the Tyrone Spong love.asdfjkl wrote:Not when it comes to Dutch lol.MarkMcBurney wrote:Post it in your native tongue instead. Google is pretty good at translating goat-herding language to the Queen's English.asdfjkl wrote: If Fury had that it would have been taken away ages ago. And yup, as explained, it's translated to dumb people language.
@foxdog, haven't you been proven wrong enough by now?
Pureist wrote:There is no data on how long it takes for meldonium to clear from a persons system, so how can you say for sure he cheated when it was ok to take it up until 2016, sharipova has the same issue in the tennis
Well love... He lived close near indeed, but that's all, but yes I'm a fan of him. I don't think he will make it to the top 10, but it won't be that far of.MarkMcBurney wrote:Ahhhh, that explains the Tyrone Spong love.asdfjkl wrote:Not when it comes to Dutch lol.MarkMcBurney wrote: Post it in your native tongue instead. Google is pretty good at translating goat-herding language to the Queen's English.
@foxdog, haven't you been proven wrong enough by now?
So, he is not. Clean test month after dirty test do not clean the dirty one. All the Riabinsky bulshitting is just what it is - bullshit.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
You are correct.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
Look, I caught you out lying before in the other thread regarding the Wlad vs Povetkin fight a while back. You know, the one where you made some truly bizarre comments that were basically made up, and easily proved to be complete nonsense by me simply posting a youtube video of the fight. Bizarre.bigman1968 wrote:So, he is not. Clean test month after dirty test do not clean the dirty one. All the Riabinsky bulshitting is just what it is - bullshit.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
If not the Riabinsky's 4.5M$ at their account, Povetkin was banned three weeks ago for a year at least. Riabinsky's money is the only reason Povetkin was mandatory at the first place...
Thanks.Freedom2013 wrote:You are correct.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
Chris Arreola atop short list to face Deontay Wilder this summer
Troll troll trollFreedom2013 wrote:You are correct.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
Chris Arreola atop short list to face Deontay Wilder this summer
If you do not want to be quoted - do not write here. Write you comments to yourself on your diary.kaiserbill wrote:Look, I caught you out lying before in the other thread regarding the Wlad vs Povetkin fight a while back. You know, the one where you made some truly bizarre comments that were basically made up, and easily proved to be complete nonsense by me simply posting a youtube video of the fight. Bizarre.bigman1968 wrote:So, he is not. Clean test month after dirty test do not clean the dirty one. All the Riabinsky bulshitting is just what it is - bullshit.kaiserbill wrote:So, Povetkin is clean.
I knew something was amiss with the indecent haste Wilder ran to catch a flight back home. He couldn't have ducked out of there faster if he'd tried.
He would have broken the Olympic 100m record....
I'm going to take a wild ass guess and say that Wilder will be fighting yet another bum next....
If not the Riabinsky's 4.5M$ at their account, Povetkin was banned three weeks ago for a year at least. Riabinsky's money is the only reason Povetkin was mandatory at the first place...
You then ran away with your tail between your legs.
I'm not even Russian, and have no dog in this fight, but it's clear from wading through your anti-Russian bile that flows forth from most of your posts that you have serious issues.
Please don't quote me in future, as I generally don't respond to poster with such serious xenophobic issues such as you clearly have.
http://boxrec.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f ... 6#p4321886kaiserbill wrote:Almost every single one of your sentences is factually incorrect or false.bigman1968 wrote:So please, explain me the stupidkaiserbill wrote:
What a stupid post.
You don't even have to leave Boxrec to do even the most basic of research.
Rubbish.most of his fight took place in Russia
21 of his 31 fights have been outside Russia.
http://boxrec.com/boxer/318081
More rubbish.the vs Perez fight was badly fixed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6kFPCCo5aw
More rubbish.he met the canvas 4-5 times following jabs!!! Wlad had to hold him from falling to KO
2nd round knockdown was from a left hook.
The 3 knockdowns in round 7 were:
1:from a straight overhand right followed by a push.
2; A hook, followed by a series of uppercuts whilst wrestling.
3: Straight right, uppercuts, and more wrestling and shoving.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxF4QzdEDnQ
The "4-5 times" was actually 4 times, so no need to try and hyperbolise. They were not jabs, and a couple at least were dubious.
Povetkin complained about the shoving, and he has a point in at least some of that. Wlad was deducted a point later for persistent infringements.
The other stuff in your post is equally rubbish, and not even worth discussing.
There are actual boxing fans on this site who remember things and have access to the internet.
It is very difficult to figure out why on earth somebody would make a post like you did, with every single sentence basically being wrong.
I'm not surprised many others didn't bother to respond and "explain" as you requested after that drivel, as it is clearly going to be a waste of time.
Using lots of question marks and exclamation marks (!!!!???!!!) does not make something that is false into the truth.
It's Klitschko, by the way. You're misspelling/leaving out 25% of the letters of his surname.
He's like you thenasdfjkl wrote:Bigman1968 is indeed wrong all the time, that's nothing new.
Wrong again...foxdog1923 wrote:He's like you thenasdfjkl wrote:Bigman1968 is indeed wrong all the time, that's nothing new.
